Aux Armes, Citoyens
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/19/security-guard-arrested-for-removing-man-from-womens-bathroom/
A female security guard working at a Washington, D.C. grocery store was arrested Monday afternoon for physically escorting a man out of the women’s restroom after he refused to leave because he identifies as a woman.
The shopper — a young, African-American male who identified himself as Ebony Belcher to local news outlets — reportedly passed the security guard on his way into the women’s restroom at a Giant grocery store in Northeast D.C.
After seeing Belcher walk into the women’s restroom, the security guard followed him in and ordered the man to leave. When he refused, the security guard had to physically escort him out of the women’s restroom.
Upon leaving the store, Belcher called police to have the security guard arrested. D.C. police confirmed to NBC4 Washington that the woman was arrested and charged with simple assault. D.C. police told TheDC that they are treating the incident as a “suspected hate crime.”
He told WJLA that he believed “the woman had no reason to put her hands on me,” adding that he was emotionally traumatized by the incident. “I’m hurt by this. It’s terrible… I’m distraught,” he said. “People should not be discriminated [sic] based on their gender identity.”
My comment: The social contract is officially broken when those entrusted with protecting the body politic from criminals who would invade their natural rights have sided with the criminals and declared for the invasion, and when discussion on the matter is no longer possible, instead called hate speech.
Anarchy is a condition of lawlessness; tyranny is when the enforcers of the law are lawless.
The courts, police, and administrators are lawless when they enforce laws that have not been passed, or enforce laws so vague that they cannot serve to tell a reasonable man what is or is not prohibited and allowed.
Meanwhile, in other news, Facebook will ban users who dare to claim that there are two sexes:
One user, who asked to remain anonymous, said Tuesday he was given a 30-day ban for a graphic declaring that there are two gender— male and female.
Here’s the picture in question:
According to Facebook, this violates their community standards.
How is that possible? Good question. Apparently, Facebook is so liberal that it now rejects science and banishes anyone who disagrees.
My comment: (Note that the graphic uses the word ‘sex’, which is a real word with a real meaning, whereas the allegedly conservative newswriter uses the Newspeak nonword ‘gender’ which means either a part of speech, or, in some anthropological circles, is a technical term for a sexual role in society, regardless of one’s biological sex. Here is another case of a conservative, unwittingly adopting the enemy’s vocabulary, aiding and abetting the enemy.)
Take the two stories together. What does it mean? One enforcement is formal and legal, the police, and the other is informal and cultural, a business turning away unwanted customers. What is being enforced and why? What is the purpose?
Now, do not be deceived. When dealing with Morlocks (creatures once human, also known, ironically, as Progressives) please keep in mind that the issue is never the issue.
They do not give a Tinker’s damn about transsexuals in locker rooms any more than they give a damn about the rights of homosexuals to mock marriage, or the rights of women. If they gave a damn about any of those things, they would not run interference for Mohammedanism, nor take such pride in defending the Religion of Peace, even while it blows up Jewish schoolgirls.
Ask yourself what any Progressive would do if he saw Mohammedans honor-killing women, stoning teenage rape victims, throwing homosexuals from rooftops, and preaching a new holocaust for the Jews.
To ask the question is to answer it: the Progressive would side with, defend, write apologetics for, deflect attention from, and promote, pet and support the Mohammedan carrying a severed head, and throw the gays, women, and minorities under the bus without an eyeblink of hesitation.
He would then baldly deny that any such apologetics ever takes place, but say (without cracking a smile) that he is only pointing out that not all Muslims are terrorists, and Muslims are people, too. Unlike Straight, White, Male Christians, who not. (Ask yourself when is the last time you heard a Progressive say ‘But not all Catholic priests are pederasts!’ or ‘Not all Whites have White Privilege!’ or ‘Not all Men are potential rapists!’)
The Progressive love affair with violent Jihadist terrorism seems odd if and only if you believe anything a Progressive says. If you look at their actions, and not their words, you see they always select the group to support who will cause the most chaos and upset in the system, regardless of what the group wants or needs.
Now, you may say you know a Progressive who is sincere, and who lacks this ulterior motive. That may be, but he is not a Progressive, not a Morlock: he is a follower, a true believer, a chump, a mark, an Eloi.
The Eloi followers of Progressive thought may or may not aware of where their leaders are leading them: but we need not reach that question. What degree of willful self-deception is involved is a matter for speculation. But once a zombie has been programmed to reject all rational conversation as racist hate speech the possibility of introspection is closed. They are neither deceived nor not deceived because they do not think about the issue at all: it is blanked out.
The Eloi exist only to be consumed by the Morlocks. They don’t make plans. They don’t matter.
No, this is pure Saul Alinsky tactics. The issue is never the issue, the issue is always chaos. The issue is always tearing down the social order, producing instability, breaking apart families, creating destruction.
About John C Wright
John C. Wright is a practicing philosopher, a retired attorney, newspaperman, and newspaper editor, and a published author of science fiction. Once a Houyhnhnm, he was expelled from the august ranks of purely rational beings when he fell in love; but retains an honorary title.
