Nominations Open for 2016 Hugo and 1941 Retro!

Posted February 23, 2016 By John C Wright

Got this in the mail:

MidAmeriCon II is pleased to announce that nominations for the 2016 Hugo Awards and the 1941 Retro Hugo Awards is now open!

As a member of Sasquan, you are eligible to nominate works for both awards. The nomination period is now open, and will close on March 31, 2016 at 11:59 pm PDT. You can find all the details for this process on the MidAmeriCon II website at http://midamericon2.org/the-hugo-awards/hugo-nominations/.

 

Well, I don’t know about you, but the enmity and illwill surrounding the nominations last year have made me want to win seven nominations this year. Let us break the record! Again!

All that is needed to provoke the usual suspects into their usual paroxysms of public phrenzy is to recommend works on their merits, regardless of various politically correct checklists making sure authors are awarded on the basis of skincolor, ethnic origin, sex, sexual perversion, political utility, or connection to the insiders who regard the award as theirs. It is yours, dear reader.

Myself, I have not decided for which works to vote, except that  I hereby encourage my readers to vote for my work, and encourage fans of Jeffro Johnson to put him on the ballot as Best Fan Writer, or for multiple columns on Appendix N on the ballot for Best Related Work.

Does anyone have anything he suggest I read as a worthy of nominating?

For the 1941 Retro-Hugo, this was smack in the richest period of the Golden Age of Science Fiction, and so there is plenty of tales by Manly Wade Wellman, L. Sprague de CampJames Blish, Theodore Sturgeon, Frank Belknap Long, Willy Ley, Henry Kuttner, Frederik PohlC. M. Kornbluth Alfred Bester,  Eric Frank Russell and Clifford D. Simak to chose from.

I list only the ones I have read:

  • Second Stage Lensmen by E.E. ‘Doc’ Smith
  • The Vortex Blasters by E.E. ‘Doc’ Smith
  • Goddess of Fire by Edgar Rice Burroughs
  • The Living Dead by Edgar Rice Burroughs
  • Jorge Luis BorgesThe Garden of Forking Paths (El Jardín de senderos que se bifurcan) for short story
  • Nightfall by Isaac Asimov
  • Seesaw by A.E. van Vogt (Weapon Shops of Isher)
  • Not the First by A.E. van Vogt
  • The Howling Tower by Fritz Leiber (Fafhrd and Gray Mouser story)
  • Jay Score by Erik Frank Russell
  • Reason by Isaac Asimov
  • Liar! by Isaac Asimov
  • Not Final! by Isaac Asimov
  • Half Breed by Isaac Asimov
  • Logic of Empire by Robert Heinlein
  • We Also Walk Dogs by Robert Heinlein (Future History)
  • By His Bootstraps by Robert Heinlein
  • Universe by Robert Heinlein
  • Common Sense by Robert Heinlein
  • Solution Unsatisfactory by Robert Heinlein
  • Elsewhen by Robert Heinlein (aka Assignment in Eternity)
  • Sixth Column by Robert Heinlein
  • –And He Built a Crooked House by Robert Heinlein
  • The Incomplete Enchanter by  L. Sprague de Camp , Fletcher Pratt
  • The Iron God • novelette by Jack Williamson
  • L. Sprague de CampLest Darkness Fall (novel)
  • Robert A. HeinleinMethuselah’s Children
  • C. S. LewisThe Screwtape Letters

Good heavens! Merely seeing the names of the authors writing in 1941, from Edgar Rice Burroughs to Fritz Leiber brings a sense of wonder and loss: Wonder, for these humble pulps produced so much worthy science fiction and seeded so many dreams. Loss, that there are none their equal writing today.

 

24 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Repeal the 19th Amendment

Posted February 23, 2016 By John C Wright

Perhaps you have already seen this video. I heard about it on talk radio as I was driving. It made me revisit a question which, in my mind at least, I would have thought was settled and resolved: the question of female suffrage.

Read the remainder of this entry »

61 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

John C Wright Endorses The Devil

Posted February 22, 2016 By John C Wright

My latest article at EveryJoe is up. Despite how early in the election cycle it is (I usually start thinking about whom to support in late October) my editor asked me to endorse one candidate or another, so I held my nose and picked one. One candidate, I mean, not one nose.

When deciding which candidate for the Presidential nomination to support, one should take a step back, look at the larger picture of where we stand in the tragic debacle called history, and take both the long-term strategic goals into account as well as the short-term tactics.

The big picture is a dark one indeed.

America, as the world’s sole superpower, is effectively beyond the strength of any foreign enemy to defeat, or even to wound severely. We cannot be killed, that is the good news.

But we have committed suicide. That is the bad news. We have already swallowed the cold poison, soaked in the tubs, and slashed our wrists. The question is whether enough time remains – even as the warm, fuzzy, comfortable sensation of numbness comes over us and urges us to close our eyes – to rouse ourselves, vomit out the poison killing us, and bind up our wounds to stop the bleeding.

Even the destruction of the Twin Towers, which killed as many Americans as a Civil War battlefield, was due not to the cunning and might of the enemy, but to political correctness that forbade the government officers who allowed the terrorists into our nation to expel or investigate them, for fear of being called racist.

The shootings in San Bernardino likewise were due not to cleverness or strength, but to the politically correct unwillingness of a suspicious neighbor to report the arsenal she saw being gathered.

The case Ahmed the Clockmaker is even more instructive: a Muslim boy brought a mock bomb to a school as a prank, and, after being warned, displayed it to teachers who were required during wartime to treat all terrorist threats as real. He found himself suddenly invited to the White House, and lavished with praise and adoration for achieving the one supreme felicity political correctness holds up as the goal of all life: to be the victim of racism.

What does one conclude from this firestorm of evil and nonsense?

The proper conclusion is there are two religions, two cultures, and two Americas in America. One is the real America, lived by real people living their real lives. These Americans believe in individual liberty, the free market, the rule of law and the Word of God.

The other is a sick delusion that is created and maintained by the press, by the academics, by the entertainment industry, and by flocks of hysterical liars. In this America, a patriarchy of white, straight Christian males ruthlessly and by numberless invisible and undetectable evil magic spells oppresses, robs, cheats, rapes, and kills all its helpless and saintly victims.

But, by the twisted logic of modern Leftwing lunacy (a doctrine called intersectionism) everyone is also an oppressor in turn, so that a black Christian is an oppressor of heathens and homosexuals merely by virtue of his Christianity; a homosexual male oppresses women merely by virtue of being male; a white woman oppresses blacks merely by virtue of being white; all hale people oppress all cripples merely by virtue of being non-crippled; all sane people oppress all crazies merely by virtue of being neurotypical; all non-perverts oppress all perverts merely by virtue of being cisnormative.

The religion of the real America is anything within the Judeo-Christian tradition. The religion of delusional America is Political Correctness. The real Americans love America, see it as a shining city on a hill, and as the last best hope for human liberty on the planet. The Delusional Americans see America as the only evil in the world, a pathless forest of monsters and boogermen, and the only threat to the planet.

Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2016/02/22/politics/election-2016-real-and-delusional-america/#ixzz40vmpKDGC

60 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Worth Dying For

Posted February 22, 2016 By John C Wright

In deciding one’s political philosophy, one should look first at what makes a man willing to lay down his life for another, because that is the fundamental political bond.

In ancient times, it was tribalism, that is, the bonds of bloodkinship, shared religion, shared lore and myth and legend and worldview.

In the city-states of Greece tribal bonds were less important, and the agora of shared laws, shared gods, and shared history more.

The Roman Imperium shared the Roman Law, literature, culture and the shared sense of being civilized, of being part of the ‘Ecumen’ the civilized inhabited world.

Then came Christianity, and that was a bond that survived when the laws and imperial military failed.

After the fall of the Western Empire, the shared things were princedoms, religion, history. After the Reformation, the nation-state was the shared bond.

In the United States the attempt was made to have the shared bond be the dedication to a proposition that all men are created equal, but the informal bonds of religion, language, culture continued to bind the federal nation.

With the French and Russian revolutions, and the rise of Fascism, the bonds of propositional nations were attempted with different and evil propositions. They failed in a spectacular fashion, as shown in the high cost of blood spilled needed to maintain their regimes.

Since 1960, the Left has been willfully, carefully, and relentlessly obliterating all the shared values of the Americans, erasing our history texts, forbidding public religion, bringing our laws into contempt and disrepute.

For myself, I am willing to die for the Constitution, but not for the opinions of four liberal justices of the Supreme Court who claim the Constitution allows the government to make the Little Sisters of the Poor pay for contraception and Abortion, trample the cross, spit on images of Mary, etc. The Laws of this nation form no bond between me and other patriots, not these laws, not any more.

But neither is whiteness for the sake of whiteness something for which I would die. The bond is too attenuated: why should I pick a white guy like Joe Biden over my daughter, who is Chinese?

On the other hand, I would gladly side with Christians of any sort against Mohammedans of all sorts, and fight and die shoulder to shoulder with them, because that is the core of my worldview, the thing that makes life meaningful.

The Leftists feel the same way about Political Correctness. They will die before they speak or think a true thing: their devotion to falsehood is absolute, beyond reason, and beyond comprehension. It is their God.

The free market, free trade, and the various other Enlightenment concepts seem to have failed in the modern day — but why?

My suggestion is that the Enlightenment was a cease fire in a Protestant-Catholic civil war ripping Christendom in two, and the only way to step back toward the limited government the Feudal system imposed on kings (who neither made laws nor governed religious matters).

My suggestion is that Constitutionally limited government will work with a morally upright people, which is to say, a Christian people, and is utterly unsuited to heathens.

Limiting the power of Caesar means having faith that the problems Caesar would otherwise solve with that power can be solved some other way, such as through the Church, or by prayer, or by the voluntary efforts of the countless smaller associations and institutions men in Christendom form. Unlimited governments, on the other hand, cannot tolerate a Church which is not subordinate to the national leader, a law that is not allowed to solve current problems, or smaller institutions and private gatherings which attract the loyalty of men, and form the core of resistance against Caesar’s ambitions.

Having free trade between two peaceful Christian powers is mutually beneficial in economic terms. A free movement of peoples from crime-riddled tyrannies and deathcult infected tribal areas into Christian civilization is not mutually beneficial: it is a slow motion invasion.

21 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Twitter Suspends Truth

Posted February 22, 2016 By John C Wright

I do not use Twitter, so it is nothing to me that they have decreed themselves to be an arm of the Democrat Party, and vowed to use all their powers in an election year to belittle, harass, silence, and smother any conservative voices in the public arena.

But please keep in mind. The virulent strain of Political Correctness known as Social Justice Warfare, Fifth Wave Feminism, or Intersectionalism, also known as Morlockery, is hatred, pure and simple.

It is directionless, destructive, and omnivorous. They are not in favor of anything, they just hate you.

Why such creatures are tolerated among civilized men for even an instant is beyond understanding.

http://datechguyblog.com/2016/02/20/the-twitter-star-chamber-suspends-stacy-mccain/

Just posting a link. The words below are those of Datechguy from Da Tech Guy Blog.

Before there was Milo Yiannopoulos there was Robert Stacy McCain. A chain smoking, beer drinking, coffee guzzling hard nosed reporter who rather than simply going with the flow and repeating the conventional wisdom dared to go out into the field and actually see and report for himself.

And when he didn’t have a spot in the MSM to do it anymore on a regular basis he began his web site The Other McCain (named to differentiate himself from his distant cousin John in the Senate) and with funding provided by his readers (and sometimes without it going places on a wing and a prayer) he would travel the country from Alaska to New Hampshire from Nevada to New Orleans to cover stories that the MSM would not.

And when Bill Sparkman’s death became a national story and there were cries of “Send the Body to Glenn Beck” it was Stacy McCain who was the boots on the ground who actually went to Kentucky and investigated the story finding no evidence of murder and was vindicated when his death was revealed to be a suicide staged to appear like a murder.

He has managed to do all of this while raising a family of six which now includes two grandchildren who are his joy (although they have considerably slowed down his travels, after all family comes first).

Bottom line though not a rich man Robert Stacy McCain is an American Success story he has built a nationwide, dare I say worldwide following presenting his viewpoint and highlighting the public viewpoints of others who would rather keep their actual words and opinions under the radar because Robert Stacy McCain is loyal to his family, his God, his friends and the Truth.

I know this because I’m proud to say he is my friend.

Read the whole thing. It is appalling and amazing:

http://datechguyblog.com/2016/02/20/the-twitter-star-chamber-suspends-stacy-mccain/

11 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Musical interlude:

За тихой рекою

За тихой рекою, берёзовой рощей
Распустится первый весенний цветок
И я загадаю желание попроще
И перекрестившись взгляну на Восток

Окрасится небо багряной зарёю
И вечное солнце над миром взойдёт
И белая птица взлетит над землёю
И Божие прощение с небес принесёт

И что-то большое откроется сердцу
Такое что жизнью моей не объять
И станет спокойно, и сладко как в детстве
Когда обнимала меня моя мать

Молитва святая слезами прольётся
Христовой любовью исполнится грусть
И в это мгновение душа прикоснётся
К великой вселенной по имени Русь

“Beyond The Quiet River”

Beyond the quiet river and birch grove
The first spring flower is bursting into bloom
And I am simply making a wish
And having crossed myself, I will glance to the East

The sky will be coloured (lit: colour itself) by scarlet dawn
And the eternal sun will rise over the world
And a white bird will fly over the earth
And bring God’s forgiveness from the heavens

And something big will make itself known to my heart
Such that it is not [possible] to take in in my lifetime
And it will become peaceful and sweet like in childhood
When my mother hugged me

A solemn prayer will flow with tears
Sadness will be filled with Christ’s love
And at that moment my soul will touch
The grand entirety with the name of Russia

7 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Mocking the Dead

Posted February 18, 2016 By John C Wright

The persons over at File 770 have decided to mock the memory of the late, great Mr. David Hartwell by intimating that if I compliment the editing skills of Vox Day, and call him the best editor with whom I have had the pleasure to work, this means I am somehow diminishing Mr. Hartwell’s contributions.

These sentiments are expressed with such reckless contumely, and with such disrespect for the dead, that I cannot bring myself to repeat them. It is merely horrible what people will say about a man who is no longer here to defend himself.

Mr. Hartwell, almost singlehandedly, was behind the New Space Opera Renaissance, of which I have the honor to be a minor member. With the discovery and promotion of authors such as Greg Bear and David Brin, he brought Hard SF back from the outfield into the front and center of the genre. Few men aside from John W. Campbell Jr. or Hugo Gernsbeck himself had such a profound and beneficial influence on the field.

Read the remainder of this entry »

20 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Twitter Meets Orwell — an FAQ by Daddy Warpig

Posted February 17, 2016 By John C Wright

Twitter Shadowbans Briefing and FAQ by

@Daddy_Warpig

What Is “Shadowbanning”?

Twitter has introduced a brave new way of screwing with users, which some have taken to calling shadowbanning.

Basically, this acts like a gag: you can send normal tweets normally, but people Following you won’t see them on their timeline. (However, people reading your profile will see them.)

The following restrictions also apply:

  • Your tweets won’t show up in certain hashtags (which and why is unknown).
  • Your tweets won’t show up in Search, either by keyword or by account name.

Tweets still show up normally in Lists.

Taken together, these restrictions have the effect of making you “invisible” to most others on Twitter, but you are never informed about them so you don’t know it. With shadowbans, Twitter censors you silently, for no stated reason, for an indeterminate period of time.

This is BOTH Kafkaesque and Orwellian.

[Indeed, the very existence of shadowbans is what makes people suspect that Twitter will use its new TL algorithm to silently censor “undesirable” users. It’s the next logical step.]

Read the remainder of this entry »

4 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Rabid Puppy Reading List

Posted February 16, 2016 By John C Wright

Is it that time of year already? Nominations for the Hugo Awards are being gathered, and those of you who hold memberships are being asked to submit your nominations to go on the ballot for voters to vote on in the fall.
Rabid Puppies_508
The Puppy-kickers are our ideological foes bent on replacing popular and well crafted sci fi tales with politically correct science-free and entertainment-free moping dreck that reads like something written by a highschool creative writing course dropout.

The Puppy-kickers have repeatedly and vehemently assured us assured us that soliciting votes from likeminded fans for stories you judge worthy was a “slate” and therefore was (for reasons not specified) totally and diabolically evil and wrong and bad, was not something insiders had been doing for decades, and was always totally inexcusable, except when they did it, and voted in a slate to grant ‘No Award’ to categories where they had lost their stranglehold over the nominations.

In that spirit, I hereby officially announce in my capacity as the Grand Inquisitor of the Evil Legion of Evil Authors, that the following list is the recommended reading list of our Darkest Lord only, and not a voting slate.

These are the recommendations of my editor, Theodore Beale, aka Vox Day, the most hated man in Science Fiction, but certainly the best editor I have had the pleasure to work with.

This list is not complete, and I will add to it as the Dark Lord of Evil issues decrees from Skullcrusher Mountain or Yuggoth-on-the-Rim.

The words below are his. (But I second his recommendation of Andy Weir as best new writer, and Jeffro Johnson for Best Related Work.)

 

Read the remainder of this entry »

43 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Musical Interlude

Posted February 15, 2016 By John C Wright

This is Luna Lee from Korea, who developed a modern form of the traditional Korean instrument called a gayageum.

Read the remainder of this entry »

5 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Percent Chance that Existence Exists

Posted February 15, 2016 By John C Wright

It has been said by well accomplished and esteemed physicists that the percent chance of our universe having its current constitution, that is, the physical constants of the cosmos, such as the gravitational constant, Planck’s constant, and so on, being precisely what they are, is infinitesimal.

Bosh and nonsense. This is why argument from authority is illogical: because in cases like this accomplished physicists are making a boneheaded schoolboy error.

Ever since Pascal, people have had a confused notion of what probability is. He was asked by a Chevelier de Mere, a gentleman gambler, about the odds of wining at dice. Instead of telling him that math cannot predict outcomes, only aggregate outcomes, Pascal developed a mathematical way of expressing in how many trials out of a hundred a certain set of results out of a given set of possible results would obtain. The chance of getting a six on the roll of one die (or 1d6 for you D&D players) is one in six. The chance of rolling two sixes in a row is one in thirty-six.

But the chance of rolling a second six after you have rolled a first six is still one in six, because the die does not remember or care what the last roll was.

The chance if a man picked up the die in his finger and thumb and places it on the table so that the six is showing is a meaningless question, because this is not a case where random chance if a factor expressing our ignorance about the magnitudes involved.

Probability is when you express that number of results out of a hundred trials in terms of percent, that is, the number of times out of a hundred.

That is what probability is. That is all it is.

Read the remainder of this entry »

40 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Announcement from Ben Zwycky

Posted February 14, 2016 By John C Wright

BEYOND THE MIST’s first 99-cent Kindle Countdown deal started this morning, along with the same deal on the other two books form the same author, Mr. Ben Zwycky.

Here is the official announcement:

http://benzwycky.com/2016/02/12/kindle-countdown-deal-on-all-three-of-my-books/

I wrote the forward for BEYOND THE MIST, I liked it, and I hope you will buy a copy.

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Empire of Lies

Posted February 13, 2016 By John C Wright

Either there is truth or there is not. If there is, a civilization cannot long survive if it be based on untruth.

It there is not, civilization cannot be based on anything at all, but brute force, lies, and partisan loyalty.

Difference of thought between citizens in a truthful civilization can be reconciled by reference to the objective truth, and fact and evidence, nature and nature’s God will decide the dispute.

But in a world without truth, differences between the subjects of the Empire of Lies are by definition irreconcilable. There is nothing to which to appeal aside from brute power, and any attempt to appeal to the truth is held to be a disguised attempt to appeal to brute power. In the land of untruth, all arguments are settled not by what is said, but on who says it: and the stronger man wins, not the stronger argument.

In a world without truth, there is no law, no order. There is only Caesar, and whoever is the favorite of Caesar. The favorite wins all trials before any jury in impaneled.

Bromides urging partisans of opposite camps to coexistence in mutual toleration founder on the fact that, if no objective truth exists, no objective standard exists by which anyone can decide when to tolerate and when to coexist and when not. Should one welcome in intolerant Jihadists promising openly to behead all infidels into the ever-so tolerant coexistence? Then on what grounds are the Christians excluded?

This question is not merely unanswered, it is impossible to answer, in the Empire of Lies, because without truth  there is no moral imperative and no moral standard.

‘Tolerate Everyone and Everything’ cannot be the rule because it implies toleration those who seek to abolish this rule; and ‘Tolerate Whoso Follows the rule of Mutual Toleration’ cannot be the rule, because judging who follows and who violates the rule is impossible without truth and a standard of truth.

There can be no “I ought” in a world where there is no “It is”.

(A truth-free standard is a paradox, and attempts to follow it merely lead to logically absurd results, as in England, where Michael Savage is barred to travel, because he publicly called for resistance to terrorism, but terrorists are welcomed with open arms.)

For many a year, the West was able to embrace both those who believed in truth and those who believed in nothing in her bosom. A peace, or at least a ceasefire, was able to be maintained between Christendom and the Empire of Lies which opposes her.

As the Nihilists of the Empire of Lies increase in strength, and as the logical ramifications of their stance play out, that ceasefire will be ever harder to maintain.

The whores and nuns cannot live together in the same house for long: it must become either a nunnery and expel the whores, or become a cathouse and expel the nuns. The mere fact that the virgins exist offends the whores, and so no permanent peace is possible between them.

So, likewise, the mere fact that Christians exist offends the loyal Sons of Nothing, and, as time passes, their intolerance increases, and not just Christians who believe in God, but any honest man of any stripe who believes in anything objective falls under their hysterical opprobrium and deep hatred.

A society that does not believe in an objective reality, an objective standard to judge good and evil social orders, an objective moral law, and an objective standard of logic and of fact, of true and false, will always slide back into collectivism and institutional injustice.

Read the remainder of this entry »

75 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Prayer Request

Posted February 11, 2016 By John C Wright

A young mother whose three previous pregnancies ended in miscarriage is asking for help through prayer. Please offer prayers and fasting for her (her name is Courtney) her husband (Matthew) and for the little one (whose name we don’t yet know.)

St. Catherine of Vadstena , pray for us.

 

 

9 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Chasing Freedom

Posted February 10, 2016 By John C Wright

My wife interviews the authoress of CHASING FREEDOM, Marina Fontain.

http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/2016/02/10/superversive-blog-interview-with-author-marina-fontain/

Finally, a dystopia by someone who has actually lived in one!

Today, we have an interview with Marina Fontain of Liberty Island, author of the new book, Chasing Freedom.

How did you come to write this book?

It all began with a flash fiction contest at Liberty Island, an online fiction magazine. A New York Times columnist, Maureen Dowd, had written a fictional piece sometime in late 2013 that had future U.S. over-run by zombies because the politicians defunded CDC (or something like that, anyway). Liberty Island challenged its members to “write better.” I had a good chuckle, wished my writer friends good luck and went to bed.

Overnight, I had a “vision,” if you will, of an American family packing up to move to Canada. Also, they would be transported by a horse-and-buggy arrangement. That was all I knew. Mind you, before this happened, I had never written fiction in my life, but I got curious as to how this setup might happen. Why are they leaving? Why Canada? Why horse and buggy and not a car or bus or plane?

You can probably tell where this is going. I wrote out the full flash fiction piece, and Liberty Island published it along with other entries. But I kept wanting to know more about the world. I started getting more characters, more stories, and it just kept growing until at some point I realized this could be a full novel. And so here I am, much to my surprise, being told I can no longer call myself an “aspiring” author because my book is actually out there.

How did you pick the genre?

Dystopia is a natural fit for me as it happens to be a combination of writing “what you know” and “what you read.” Having grown up in the former Soviet Union, I know first hand how an oppressive society operates—what it does to people, how the system sustains itself, but also the potential weaknesses and cracks that are invisible to the outsiders. I have brought a lot of this understanding into my writing, and it helped make it more grounded and realistic.

I have also read many dystopian novels, both classics and the more recent offerings. There were themes that I have loved, but also points of disagreement with some of the visions out there. I have tried to address some of what I thought were the pitfalls of the genre and create something that was fresh and—hopefully—exciting, even to the readers who might have been over-saturated with the dystopian literature as a whole.

Can you tell us (without too many spoilers) a little about the characters and their journey?

Read the whole thing here: http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/2016/02/10/superversive-blog-interview-with-author-marina-fontain/ 

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation