HERMETIC MILLENNIA Excerpt: Just Because It Made Me Laugh

I realize it is wrong on many levels for a writer to be amused by his own words, but keep in mind I don’t consider myself to have invented Mickey the Witch of Williamsburg, but rather to have discovered him from the Muse who whispered him to me.

This is a scene from HERMETIC MILLENNIA (on sale now!). The setup is this: archeologists of the race of the Blue Men in the year 10515 AD have looted a ultralongeterm hibernation facility, and woken the slumberers from several different eras and previous civilizations.

One of the men they woke is Menelaus Montrose, the inventor of suspended animation. Over the centuries and millennia, a myth has grown up around him, and the more superstitious centuries regard him as a godling, like Anubis, the guardian of tombs and sacred crypts where the ancestors rest.

He is said to condemn any age of history which does not maintain a technology level sufficient for space flight, and to sentence the civilizations of that age to apocalypse and destruction: and therefore this fearsome figure is called the Judge of Ages.

He actually does possess the art, learned from supremely advanced and mysterious aliens, of statistical prediction of the future, something like the ‘psychohistory’ of Isaac Asimov’s FOUNDATION stories, and so can predict the downfall of civilizations, or set in motion events calculated to cause a downfall. So the myth of a Judge of ages is not baseless, even though it is not accurate.

One of his loyal allies is a warlock from one of the more superstitious of the many Dark Ages cratering the landscape of history, a man named Melechemoshemyazanagual Onmyoji de Concepcion, Padre Bruja-Stregone of Donna Verdant Coven at the Holy Fortress at Williamsburg. Since that is impossible for poor Meany Montrose to pronounce, he calls him Mickey.

The archeological dig is also a prison camp, where the disinterred and thawed out slumberers are kept, and forced to work digging up other hibernating relics from ages long lost. Outside the wire, the world is suffering an Ice Age, and whether or not Menelaus Montrose’s ancient enemy, Ximen del Azarchel, is still alive, or whether anyone is still alive, is a matter of debate.

We join the conversation as Mickey and Meany are discussing the aircraft they can glimpse in a small airfield beyond the prison camp wire.

Continue reading

Posted in Fancies, Free Fic | 11 Comments

The secrets of THE SORCERER’S HOUSE by Gene Wolfe

Here follows a review and a discussion. The review contains no spoilers, or only minor ones, and the discussion contains nothing but.

Layout 1

Review:

THE SORCERER’S HOUSE concerns one Baxter Dunn, an ambidextrous a scholar with double degrees and a con-man and an ex-con, living after his release from jail in perfect poverty the small town of Medicine Man. He writes to his rich brother and identical twin George begging politely for money.

At least so it seems on the first reading of the book. On the second reading, once we know Baxter’s true and sinister intentions, one can see the accusatory tone hidden beneath the courtesy and self-deprecation, and, yes, the attempt to provoke the brother to anger. The letters are written by a con-man, after all, and one who knows how to manipulate people.

On the first reading, we find that Bax (as he insists on being called) by pure happenstance finds an empty house with the broken back door, and he lets himself in to find a place he can stay rent free.

Upon second reading, it seems clear he broke the lock to let himself in, but it is unclear how and why he selected that house. A third reading is called for.

Then strange things, mysterious trespassers by candlelight, gruesome murders, strange noises in the night, begin to haunt the Black House, and it begins to seem bigger that it at first appeared, and some of the windows open up on a forest that never grew on this earth we know.

Continue reading

Posted in Fancies | 9 Comments

Stand with Rand

The inimitable Mark Shea, the only other member of the Shea-Wright mutual admiration society, writes what I would have written were my server not malfunctioning.  Let me just quote him in toto:

A politician has done something I actually find inspiring. Yesterday we actually heard the St. Crispin’s Day speech on the floor of the Senate. And people are flocking to Rand Paul’s support. Heck, you’ve got John Cusack, of all people, coming to Paul’s support and asking where the hell the Democrats are, while Salon is shamefacedly reporting that (surprise!) lefties are more likely to take the Nixonian line that murdering people with drones is okay when the President does it. If you don’t believe it, just read the Obama suckups and buttkissers over at HuffPo. Quelle courage!

Meanwhile, the Nixon Obama Justice Department doubles down and declares that Obama “has authority to use drone strikes to kill Americans on US soil”.

We could actually be looking at a historic moment here if Obama backs down and Paul’s challenge to the Police State stands. Go Rand Paul! The guy will, I hope, be a real force for good if he keeps on in this vein.

Jordan Bloom is liveblogging the whole glorious spectacle.

Posted in Musings | 42 Comments

Slowly the One Ring Brings them All to Mordor; or Cratocracy

A video from last year by Bill Whittle. It touches on my two favorite topics, politics and LORD OF THE RINGS.

Continue reading

Posted in Musings | 27 Comments

Gaiman on Wolfe

Neil Gaiman’s review of Gene Wolfe’s THE SORCERER’S HOUSE

Discovered at GOODREADS

Caveat: This book is dedicated to me, so I may well be immediately biased in its favour.

It’s an epistolary novel. Very dark, very strange, dislocating and dream-like. An ex-prisoner has inherited (or has he?) an abandoned house, containing a were-fox, a ghostly butler, and, possibly, the contents of the Tarot. Twins occur and reoccur, identities are exchanged, people are not what they appear to be…

I’m loving it, but am reading it only a few pages at a time, to make it last.

Right, I finished it. And now, more than anything else, I want to read it again. Some of the twists, yes, I guessed, but the full way the book opens out made me start to reread immediately. I think the book, like the house, is bigger than it first appears.

As a side note, I have a mad theory that you can always find a Wolf in a Gene Wolfe book, and it will always be the key, or a key, to the text. This book does nothing to disprove my theory.

Am now rereading. I love the patterns in the book. (I spoke about the tarot earlier: the book consists of two sets of 22 chapters, a doubled set of trumps). I love that a lazy reader would read a book that is not as good as the one that Gene Wolfe wrote, while a reader who is working gets a book that, like the Sorcerer’s House itself, appears small and straightforward, and then grows on the inside.

Gene Wolfe once defined good literature as (I quote from memory) something that can be read with pleasure by an educated reader, and reread with increased pleasure, and this is one of those.

My comment: This is one of my favorite Gene Wolfe books, right after his SHADOW OF THE TORTURER and ON BLUE’S WATER. I have recently reread it, and will probably write up some of my own thoughts in the coming week. For the moment, I will but concur with Mr Gaiman that Mr Wolfe’s definition of good literature matches with C.S. Lewis’ (A NEW THEORY OF CRITICISM) and my own.

Posted in Fancies | 3 Comments

New Feature on Visions of Arhyelon

My beautiful and talented wife is running a “Caption This” contest over at Visions of Arhyelon. Take a look:

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/279240.html

Posted in Announcement | Leave a comment

A Peek Behind the HERMETIC MILLENNIA

Normally, I do not take up space explaining my books or answering questions about them. They are meant to speak for themselves, or not at all. If there are jests or allusions to other authors in my work, these are spoilt if I need to amplify them.

And, frankly, my books are patterned after the kind of book I like to read: lighthearted escapist fare, full of action and fury, with relatively little pondering of deep issues with which anyone would take issue.

Of course, the weasel word there is ‘relatively.’ Try as I might to keep it light, a certain amount of ponderous philosophic profundity tends, entirely without my consent, to creep into my work from some hidden hemisphere of my brain. Here I can only throw myself on the blind hope that my beloved readers will be kind enough to tolerate the flaw.

However tolerant the readers are, it is possible that this unintentional profundity obscures the plain meaning of my books, and the inattentive reader might take away a meaning the opposite of my intent.

The fault in such cases is of course mine for being unclear. While it would be more dignified and noble, no doubt, merely to endure the opprobrium my unclarity has summoned up, I confess that a certain base commercial impulse, namely, the desire to sell books, requires that I make a token protest in those few cases where the inattentiveness assumes cyclopean proportions.

A reader, whose name for courtesy’s sake I withhold, put forward this opinion about my humble work THE HERMETIC MILLENNIA:

“Some of the early bits with the variant humans were interesting, but they turned out to be kind of stereotypical when they got more screen time. Also, apparently they were all innately evil because they didn’t adhere to monogamous Christian 1950s-small-town-America values.”

I think this is a misreading of the text.

Indeed, the very opposite is the meaning of the work, had only I been able to make the meaning clear enough.

I would like to think that this one reader is alone in his interpretation, and to assure any other readers that, if you read with eyes unclouded by hate, you will see what the point of the book actually is.

Unseemly as it is for an author to have to explain his point, I myself am sometimes curious as to what an author had in mind, and should there be a solitary reader out there curious about my work, I am happy to embarrass myself before all the rest of the incurious world to satisfy that solitary fellow.

So instead of describing where or how the misreading went wrong, let me explain something about my personal writing process, and give you a peek behind the curtain to show you how a professional writer makes his auctorial decisions. It is, of course, like watching sausage being made, so the delicate-souled reader is advised to keep his fond illusions intact, and read something else.

For the solitary reader who remains, I can tell you that the short answer is that mostly you steal your ideas.

Continue reading

Posted in Drollery, Fancies | 40 Comments

The Theodicy of the Fall

The same reader who asked me to justify the ways of God to man on the question of Hell now returns to ask about the justice of the Fall of Man.

The conversation was prompted by this parable

Galadriel the Elfin queen was born in the Uttermost West, and gazed in her youth upon the white strand strewn with pearls leading to Mount Everwhite, where the unstained and angelic powers dwell, and the light from the gold trees and the silver in the First Age mingled. For the sake of ambition, and to found her own kingdom, she fled from the perfection of those blessed shores of Aman, and came to Middle Earth, which suffers under the tyranny of Melkor the Enemy, and death and disease and all unhallowed things thrive and multiply. A child of hers is born in Lothlorien, in Middle Earth, and has never seen the Blessed Lands, and the Angelic Powers of those lands has placed a barrier of fogs and enchantment and impassible seas between the Uttermost West and the sad shores of the moral world.

But, in their compassion, the Powers have allowed that any ship departing the Gray Havens may indeed find the one straight path back to the homeland of the elder race, and have their tears sponged away. The only requirement is that any crimes or misdeed performed by the elfs while tarrying in Middle Earth be confessed and forgiven, for it so happens, by some mystery the elves do not understand, some greater power from beyond even the Uttermost West, a son of Eru, the One, has been granted power to forgive.

Now, imagine this child of Galadriel, call him Gallandus, should reason thus with himself: “I do not know for certain if the tales told by my sire and dame be true of a mountain that is ever white, where the gods in peace and splendor reign, or a farther shore where no sorrow and no warfare ever comes. But for two ages of man, I have marched in battle against the orcs and unclean things of the Dark Lord, and seen sorrows unnumbered, and shed tears, and never again shall bloom for me the glorious trees of my youth I once knew, nor can I find the entwives, whom my ancestors taught the powers of speech.

“Suppose the tale is false, what then? Shall I endure the clouded oceans mazed with spells and haunted by monsters to reach no shore? What if only endless wastes, or an hemisphere without solid land, is all the prow of the Last White Ship shall find?

“If the Powers were just, they would not have imposed the sentence of my mother’s exile on me: for I was not born when she removed from that long lost world of perfection and came to this middle earth of sorrows. To punish me for my mother’s crimes when I am as innocent as new-fallen snow is gross injustice! And if the Powers are not just, I have no desire to dwell in their happy fields. Indeed, the idea of a power both angelic and unjust is a paradox: I cannot believe that they exist at all, or their homeland of which I have heard tell.”

Is there anything wrong with the reasoning of Gallandus son of Galadriel? Can you detect any flaw in his logic?

Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics | 19 Comments

The Fourth of the Big Three

During the Golden Age of Science Fiction, the Big Three Names were the three authors with the greatest prestige in the John W Campbell Jr stable of authors: Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein, and one now is unfairly unrecognized, A.E. van Vogt. His obscurity may be due in part to a malign attempt by Damon Knight to undermine his career.

These days, the term ‘The Big Three’ is still sometimes used, but the third name is given as Ray Bradbury or Arthur C Clarke. Why this should be is also unclear, since no one linked the names at the time, but, again, it may be due to Damon Knight, who for all I know is also responsible for the hole in the ozone layer.

Arthur C Clarke is a fairly convincing stand-in for a Campbell-style writer, and indeed sold his first story to Campbell (“Loophole”, in 1946 Astounding), so this may be why he is often photo-shopped into the position A.E. van Vogt was airbrushed out of. But I would argue that there was a theme, or even a philosophy, to Campbellian fiction, and that Clarke represents and older, and perhaps more literate, style of science fiction harkening back to H.G. Wells and Olaf Stapledon.

I submit to your candid judgment that Arthur C Clarke has a particular sense of a broader vision, and yet it is a darker vision, of man and his ultimate fate in the universe which is keeping with H.G. Wells and alien to Campbell.

Continue reading

Posted in Fancies | 103 Comments

Wright’s Writing Corner: Aristrocracy

The beautiful and talented Mrs Wright continues her alphabetical explanation of the Great Ideas of Western Literature:

In Today’s Post, I have finally returned to the subject of writing about the great ideas. Today’s idea: Aristocracy.

Come by and share your thoughts on your favorite nobleman…hero or villain.

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/278742.html

Posted in Wisdom | 4 Comments

Recommended Athiest Reading

I am breaking my Friday-Only writing rule to answer what I think is an excellent question by a Mr Ruiz:

Who do you consider to be the most articulate and firmly-grounded spokesmen for atheism? Who did you read and admire prior to your conversion?

In not quite Chronological Order:

1. Lucretius (albeit technically a type of polytheistic deist)

2.The anonymous author of the TREATISE OF THE THREE IMPOSTORS (admittedly, this one I recommend more for its interest as a historical curio than for the rigor of its logic)

3. Thomas Paine  Age of Reason (again, technically a Deist rather than an atheist, but close enough).

4. Colonel Robert G. Ingersoll– Nearly anything by this author is worth reading for the committed and serious atheist.

Continue reading

Posted in Apologetics | 194 Comments

Twinterview with the Missus

My beautiful and talented wife has an announcement:

I am being interviewed tonight on Twitter at 9pm EST with hashtag #sffwrtcht.

Come by and read about how I came to be the author of the PROSPERO’S DAUGHTER series. Ask questions. Say hi. Or just lurk and chuckle as we discover the answer to the question: will Twitter, which I have almost never used before, get the better of me?

Thanks!

L. Jagi Lamplighter (Wright)

Posted in Announcement | Leave a comment

Illustrations of the Tao

To forestall the inevitable tedium of repeating what should be a well known idea among all literate men, allow me to quote some examples of what philosopher’s call Natural Law, or Objective Morality.

The examples here are not being used to prove the maxims given. It is not being argued, for example, that merely because all literate races of man extol generosity and excoriate adultery that generosity is good and adultery is bad.

The examples are merely offered to establish the phenomenon to be explained, namely, that men of every culture and age agree on the moral principles, even if they disagree on how those principles are to be applied.

If morality were manmade, as positive law is, or as writing systems are, then they were differ as positive law codes differ, or differ as much as cuneiform differs from runes or hieroglyphs or ideographs or alphabets. But what we have here is a collection of statements, some originally written in runes or alphabets or hieroglyphs or ideograms, which all express the same few moral imperatives in different words. That indicates that this part of the moral law of man is not manmade but natural. Hence it is called Natural Law.

Myself, I would argue that the moral laws exists in the human heart due to the intention of the supernatural creator of man, who also has the authority to command obedience to them, and the power to disseminate these laws instantaneously at creation into every rational spirit. However, other theories can be argued as well. What cannot be argued is that there is no phenomenon to be explained by any theory, no agreement on the natural moral code.

The words below are those of CS Lewis.

Continue reading

Posted in Musings, Wisdom | 3 Comments

Mike the Martian and the Attack of the Argumentroid

One of the argumentroids of Robert Heinlein has annoyed me for years.

I was irked not the least because this particular argumentroid suckered me in my innocent youth, back when I was so proud of being a nonconformist, as were we all in my generation, and so proud of believing exactly what all the other nonconformists believed.

But let me first explain what my silly made-up word is supposed to mean.

I have always held that Science Fiction was never actually fiction stories about science. Instead, it is stories about fictional science.

Writers routinely commended for the “hardness” of their hard SF, that is to say, commended for their realism, such as Larry Niven or Isaac Asimov or Arthur C Clarke, will introduce teleportation or psycho-history or faster than light drives or telepathy, none of which has any more scientific realism than flying carpets that run on happy thoughts and fairy dust.

And Robert Heinlein, the Dean of Science Fiction, was like them a past master of the art of making their unscientific baloney seem scientific.

The writer’s chore is to lull the dragons of skepticism which guard the castle of the mind so that the waking dream of the tale can slip into the gates. The reader places himself into a half-hypnotic half-awake state known as “suspension of disbelief” where, for the sake of the story, the reader is willing to swallow the baloney if only his imagination is given enough excuse. In other words, it is not scientific accuracy that science fiction seeks or delivers, but scientific verisimilitude.

It is not supposed to be scientific, but scientifroid, if I may coin an awkward term for some hulking shape that looks vaguely like science in a dim light, but is not.

This is done in science fiction by mimicking some of the tropes of science. For example, Larry Niven posits in his ‘Known Space’ yarns that the law of conservation of momentum applies to teleportation booths, so that it is more expensive to teleport from the North Pole to the Equator than to the South Pole, because of the difference in angular momentum between a body at rest at either Pole versus a body being carried along at the speed of the rotation of the Earth. Teleportation is still hooey, but it seems more scientific if it suffers a reasonable scientific (or, rather scientifroid) limitation.

Now, it has been known since the ancient Greeks erected their first shrine to the Muses that poets and playwrights and novelists who have the craft of working this half-hypnotic trick of making the unlikely seem likely have a dangerous or divine power.

The novelist has the most powerful rhetorical tool of all at his command. He has an audience that willingly is attempting to suspend their disbelief for the sake of the story. This means, unfortunately, that a certain amount of mental litter, opinions, editorializing, propaganda and “spin” also can make it past the dragons of skepticism while they slumber.

And therein lies a certain danger, because the editorializing is not written like an editorial, where the readers knows the editor is opining an opinion; it is written like a tale. We judge editorials on their rhetorical skill and soundness of argument, their power to appeal to the passions and the reason. We judge tales on their entertainment value, their power to amuse and divert.

And, of course, the amusement value of any editorial hidden in a tale has nothing to do with the soundness of the argument given. If the reader already has a definite opinion opposing the writer’s, or if the reader has hair-triggered skepticism in general, will he be likely even to notice he is being played for a sap.

Because an editorial put across in a story will not actually put forth an argument, except on very rare occasions indeed. It put forth an argumentoid, a hulking shape that looks like an argument in a dim light.

Continue reading

Posted in Fancies, Musings | 154 Comments

On Writing Adventures

Wright’s writing corner has a guest writer, Vonnie Winslow Crist, this week!

Excerpt:

JRR Tolkien wrote: “Don’t adventures ever have an end? I suppose not. Someone else always has to carry on the story.” And thank goodness it’s true! For carrying on the story is my mission as a writer, and I believe the goal of most writers.

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/277517.html

Posted in Only Posting a Link, Wisdom | Leave a comment

Poetry Corner – The Kraken

Below the thunders of the upper deep;
Far, far beneath in the abysmal sea,
His ancient, dreamless, uninvaded sleep
The Kraken sleepeth: faintest sunlights flee
About his shadowy sides: above him swell
Huge sponges of millennial growth and height;
And far away into the sickly light,
From many a wondrous grot and secret cell
Unnumbered and enormous polypi
Winnow with giant arms the slumbering green.
There hath he lain for ages and will lie
Battening upon huge sea-worms in his sleep,
Until the latter fire shall heat the deep;
Then once by man and angels to be seen,
In roaring he shall rise and on the surface die.

Continue reading

Posted in Other | 11 Comments

G.I. Jane Speaks

Only posting a link, or, rather, a letter from a female vet who goes by the handle ‘Sentry.’ Hat tip to Jazz Shaw at Hot Air for this letter:

I’m a female veteran. I deployed to Anbar Province, Iraq. When I was active duty, I was 5’6, 130 pounds, and scored nearly perfect on my PFTs. I naturally have a lot more upper body strength than the average woman: not only can I do pull-ups, I can meet the male standard. I would love to have been in the infantry. And I still think it will be an unmitigated disaster to incorporate women into combat roles. I am not interested in risking men’s lives so I can live my selfish dream.

We’re not just talking about watering down the standards to include the politically correct number of women into the unit. This isn’t an issue of “if a woman can meet the male standard, she should be able to go into combat.” The number of women that can meet the male standard will be miniscule–I’d have a decent shot according to my PFTs, but dragging a 190-pound man in full gear for 100 yards would DESTROY me–and that miniscule number that can physically make the grade AND has the desire to go into combat will be facing an impossible situation that will ruin the combat effectiveness of the unit.

Continue reading

Posted in Only Posting a Link | 14 Comments

Future War

Why is the preferred weapon of the Galactic Empire the sword? It is to answer that question and perhaps one or two other questions of deeper import that this essay attempts.

Science fiction is now old enough that a perspective of its changes over time is possible, to contrast the dreams of past futures with the present futures.

A particularly telling survey should look at future war stories. Of all the institutions of man, war is the one that is the closest mortal men ever reach to hell. In war, good men do bad things, law and order breaks down, but also becomes tyrannical as military exigencies force civilian rights to one side, and continual fear, danger, desperation, and stench of death renders life brutal and miserable and hopeless. There is one small ray of heaven in this hell, tiny as a thread of sunlight that steals through the lock of a prison door, which is that the emergency can from time to time bring out acts of selfless and unselfregarding fortitude, patriotism, honor, sacrifice, and heroism.

War is fundamental. A man’s views on war tell you the basic axioms of his view on life. Because of this, a popular war story will tell you in an abbreviated form much about the storyteller’s most fundamental ideals and fears, and that of his audience.

Continue reading

Posted in Fancies, Musings | 80 Comments

Wright’s Writing Corner. On Animals.

The lovely and talented wife continues her post on Mortimer Adler’s list of the 101 ‘Great Ideas’. We continue with ‘Animals.’ This is a repost of her previous article.

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/276571.html

Excerpt:

Nowadays, the shelves of the children’s and young adult sections of the book store are filled with books on vampires and magic schools. It was not like that when I was young. There were very few books about magic. Mainly, if you liked enchantment, you were limited to fairy tales and books of myth.

But there were many, many, many books on animals.

Every weekend from age 8 to 17, I volunteered at a local Nature Museum. It was not a formal arrangement. My parents would drop us off there and go jogging. One day, I approached the staff while they were building a display and offered to help. They gave me the task of sticking dried grass into corrugated cardboard, to form the effect of a grassy field.

I was hooked. I loved the people who worked there. I loved helping. I showed up and found tasks to do regularly for the next nine years, sweeping, cleaning, painting lines from Tolkien on the walls, helping carrying things during the nature programs the staff gave. You name it.

 

Posted in Wisdom | Leave a comment

Aux armes, citoyens! Formez vos bataillons!

I miss the days when I was a card-carrying Libertarian. We may have been semi-anarchist pro-porn selfish nuts, but at least there were none among us who could be accused of favoring totalitarian tyranny over Constitutional government.

As a conservative, I am not so lucky. Why is there even a single one of our ranks who favors the monstrosity of secret assassination of American citizens?

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/theanchoress/2013/02/05/drone-killing-without-due-process-and-obama-and-ayers/

I’m staggered to see Harold Ford not only say he supports the killing of American citizens without evidence, solid intelligence or due process, but also to suggest that politicians and ideologues who were relentless in claiming that “enhanced interrogation” shamed America might find themselves in sympathy for the Bush position, for the current sake of Obama. Suddenly, the idea that we had standards that should not be abandoned, even in times of war, should be set aside.

My question for my fellow Tea Party conservatives is this: you are willing to march on Washington for a sake of constitutional limitations on government, and a halt to the insane levels of spending and borrowing that has put the next two generations into hock. Why are you willing to stomach this without protest, civil disobedience, obstruction, tumult,  riot? Was all that talk about the Constitution just talk?

Did you believe the Left, that we were torturing and murdering Muslims, flushing their Korans down the toilet, and thought this was necessary to the war effort? Did you believe that law, order, decency, and honor becomes optional at wartime? Then you are no true conservative.

My question for any honest members of the opposition, if there are any, is this: you are will to dress up in Guy Fawkes masks and march on Wall Street and maintain a public nuisance and crap on police cars to express your dissatisfaction with living in a free market economy and being the most pampered generation of the wealthiest nation in the history of the world. Why are you willing to stomach this?

Even if you trust President Obama as a Lightworker who will never abuse this unchecked, untrammeled, and unobserved power, why do you trust that we, whom you dismiss as racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic exophobic buck-toothed hillbillies will not vote in a President Nixon, President Palin, President Buchanan, President Bushitler or President Nehemiah Scudder?   If you are so afraid of the Jewish Interests ruling Wall Street and their power over the political process, why do you allow the political process the power to assassinate American citizens abroad without a warrant, without a hearing, and without any records being kept?

 

Posted in Only Posting a Link | 31 Comments

Call the Boys Scouts

Today is the day when the National Boy Scout council decides whether or not to follow the US Military into the anti-boy abyss.  Take a moment to call or write!

Here is the contact information: myscouting@scouting.org

Or call the National Help Desk at 877-272-1910, or the BSA National Council operator at 972-580-2000.  http://www.scouting.org/sitecore/content/BSAFoundation/ContactInformation.aspx

Make the phones ring off the walls, friends. Here are some numbers to try:

Select BSA Board Members:

  •  David L. Beck: (801) 240-1000
  •  R. Thomas Buffenbarger: (310) 967-4500
  •  Keith A. Clark: (717) 763-1121
  •  William F. “Rick” Cronk: (925) 283-7229
  •  John C. Cushman III: (904) 393-9020
  •  R. Michael Daniel: (412) 297-4989
  •  Jack D. Furst: (972) 982-8250
  •  T. Michael Goodrich: (205) 328-9445 ext. 200
  •  Earl G. Graves: (212) 242-8000
  •  Aubrey B. Harwell Jr.: (615) 244-1713
  •  Stephen Hemsley: (800) 328-5979
  •  Larry W. Kellner: (713) 468-4050
  •  Robert J. LaFortune: (918) 582-2981
  •  Joseph P. Landy: (212) 878-0600
  •  Francis R. McAllister: (406) 373-8700
  •  Scott D. Oki: (425) 454-2800
  •  Arthur F. Oppenheimer: (208) 343-4883
  •  Tico A. Perez: (407) 849-1235
  •  Robert H. Reynolds: (317) 231-7227
  •  Matthew K. Rose: (909) 386-4140
  •  Nathan O. Rosenberg: (949) 494-4553
  •  Roger M. Schrimp: (209) 526-3500
  •  Marshall M. Sloane: (781) 395-3000
  •  Rex W. Tillerson: (972) 444-1000
  •  David M. Weekley: (713) 659-8111
  •  Togo D. West, Jr.: (202) 775-1775

No matter what, the Boy Scouts of America could be counted upon to do the right thing and not yield to any social pressure. The BSA should not jeopardize the safety and moral integrity of Scouting in the interest of political correctness.

Posted in Announcement | 4 Comments

Tell the Boy Scout Leadership to show some Leadership

From Catholic and Enjoying It.

… Sadly it seems that National [Boy Scout Leadership] is considering trying to punt the matter to the unit level, with the chartering organization deciding on whether to admit homosexuals or not.  Would be hard to run a National Jamboree with some troops keeping the traditional understanding of Morally Straight, and other troops indulging in “Gay Pride” displays.  Proposed policy is at http://www.scouting.org/MembershipPolicy.aspxWe need to join together as Scouts and Adult leaders to stop the Membership Policy change.  It would lead to situations similar to the Episcopal and Anglican Churches.  To tell National to keep the current rules, contact info is here myscouting@scouting.org , the National Help Desk at 877-272-1910, or the BSA National Council operator at 972-580-2000.  http://www.scouting.org/sitecore/content/BSAFoundation/ContactInformation.aspx

Make the phones ring off the walls, friends. Here are some numbers to try:

Select BSA Board Members:

* David L. Beck: (801) 240-1000

* R. Thomas Buffenbarger: (310) 967-4500

* Keith A. Clark: (717) 763-1121

* William F. “Rick” Cronk: (925) 283-7229

* John C. Cushman III: (904) 393-9020

* R. Michael Daniel: (412) 297-4989

* Jack D. Furst: (972) 982-8250

* T. Michael Goodrich: (205) 328-9445 ext. 200

* Earl G. Graves: (212) 242-8000

* Aubrey B. Harwell Jr.: (615) 244-1713

* Stephen Hemsley: (800) 328-5979

* Larry W. Kellner: (713) 468-4050

* Robert J. LaFortune: (918) 582-2981

* Joseph P. Landy: (212) 878-0600

* Francis R. McAllister: (406) 373-8700

* Scott D. Oki: (425) 454-2800

* Arthur F. Oppenheimer: (208) 343-4883

* Tico A. Perez: (407) 849-1235

* Robert H. Reynolds: (317) 231-7227

* Matthew K. Rose: (909) 386-4140

* Nathan O. Rosenberg: (949) 494-4553

* Roger M. Schrimp: (209) 526-3500

* Marshall M. Sloane: (781) 395-3000

* Rex W. Tillerson: (972) 444-1000

* David M. Weekley: (713) 659-8111

* Togo D. West, Jr.: (202) 775-1775

The important point to make is that the Boy Scouts is one of the few institutions left in America which tries to get boys to develop character and integrity, to have standards and to live up to them. No matter what, the Boy Scouts of America could be counted upon to do the right thing and not yield to any social pressure, and has thus far stood strong.
The BSA should not jeopardize the safety and moral integrity of Scouting in the interest of social activism.

Posted in Only Posting a Link | 8 Comments

The Big Three

As a bit of a relief to my readers who are no doubt weary of hearing my Jeremiads and screeds against the evils both political and philosophical which corrupt the modern world, let us turn from the disappointments of today to yesterday’s golden dreams of tomorrow, and talk about the three major science fiction writers of Campbell’s Golden Age.

The Big Three are Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, and — wait for it— A.E. van Vogt.

Perhaps you have read books by the first two and never heard of the third. That is sad but not surprising. Perhaps, being a lover of triads, you thought the third Big Name of the Golden Age should be Arthur C. Clarke or Ray Bradbury.

Admired as these authors were and are, no one in the day considered them one of the Big Three. Van Vogt was, for a time, bigger than Asimov and Heinlein in popularity. I have seen articles, including the notoriously unreliable Wikipedia, list one or the other of Clarke and Bradbury as the third of the triad. It is partly to dispel the disturbing tendency toward historical revisionism that I write this article. Continue reading

Posted in Fancies | 36 Comments

Accuracy In Media

Only posting a link. Well, several links. This is Ed Driscoll quoting John Nolte of :

This is at least the fifth time in recent years that NBC or MSNBC has gotten caught cooking the books, John Nolte writes at Big Journalism:

1. During last year’s presidential election Andrea Mitchell was caught manufacturing a Romney gaffe where none existed.

2. During last year’s GOP primary, Ed Schultz edited video of Texas Governor Rick Perry to make him look racist.

3.  In April of last year, the “Today Show” was caught editing audio of a 9-1-1 call to make George Zimmerman look racist.

4. In August of 2009, Contessa Brewer sliced and diced a photograph so it wouldn’t look like a black man attended a Tea Party carrying a firearm.

And just today, NBC was caught in yet another malicious edit, this time to make Second Amendment advocates look as though they did something as heinous as heckling the heartsick father of a child who lost his six-year-old son in the Sandy Hook massacre. You can watch the full video and NBC’s science fiction adaptation side-by-side here.

You may ask why they practice such deception when it is certain to be discovered and exposed? The reason is simple psychology. First impressions are deeper impressions than corrections. I have a friend who saw the first version, the edited version, of the NBC agitprop, and it convinced him that the NRA were autistic when it came to normal social graces, heartless and fanatical. Upon seeing the second version, the unedited version, his first impression still persisted.

The second reason is that second thoughts tend to be tentative, and people tend not to believe that they are being lied to. Their own fairmindedness makes them gullible. Upon hearing two versions of any story, the natural reaction of any casual listener is to assume both versions are slanted to favor their side, and that the truth is perhaps somewhere in the middle. So if I falsely accuse an innocent group of ten people of wrongdoing, the average bystander, if he later hears my false accusation disputed, will assume that five or six of the people are guilty, rather than assume I lied and admit that he was deceived.

Posted in Musings | 8 Comments

What Difference Does It Make?

My Jesuit Confessor, Father de Casuist, tells me that if I am allowed to post links before Friday, I can post videos. This is the best one I have seen all year. I am puzzled that no GOP politician talks this way. Here is Bill Whittle:

Continue reading

Posted in Musings, Only Posting a Link | 8 Comments