Archive for May, 2014

Sauce for the Gander

Posted May 8, 2014 By John C Wright

I am taken to task for daring to say Heinlein would not win the Hugo these days.

http://amazingstoriesmag.com/2014/05/appropriating-heinlein/

I regard the observation as unexceptional; a sufficient number of Leftists denounce Heinlein as a fascist and sexist, and who (by their own admission) do not vote on the merits of the author’s work but on his ideological purity, to defeat a nomination.

Admittedly I am speculating about the Leftist numbers in our community, but not about their ideology. I assume anyone familiar with the field is familiar with the ideological denunciations against Bob Heinlein.

Mr Davidson argues that Mr Heinlein was a gadfly, more interested in starting a debate than in promoting any particular ideology. This is a sentiment not only I agree with, but he himself quotes me saying so. I am glad he and I agree on this point.

He also says that Mr Heinlein would tell us to cease the political wrangling and get on with the business of living. Since this was precisely my point, I am again quite happy to find myself in agreement with Mr Davidson.

Nonetheless, there seems to be a point of apparent disagreement. Read the remainder of this entry »

20 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Hell

Posted May 7, 2014 By John C Wright

Soldiers of Christ, this is required reading. This is the face of hell. This is what we are fighting. Don’t flinch. Go look.

Civilians, women, children, do not look. You will never be able to remove these images from your mind.

http://themattwalshblog.com/2014/05/07/this-is-my-positive-abortion-story/

On second thought, perhaps you should look, ladies. Take a good, hard, look. More than half, perhaps as many as two thirds of abortions are performed not because the mother truly wants one, but because a husband, boyfriend, or paramour pressures or forces her into it. This is what they are calling your right to choose. Take a good, long look.

 

60 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

I think this is the most link-heavy day I have ever had. Unlike the other two, this is meant to be the first of a weekly and ongoing feature.

This is EveryJoe:

EveryJoe is the ultimate boys club. From tech tips and gaming tricks, to the latest sports news and entertainment buzz, EveryJoe delivers non-stop action to men on the go.

Featuring valued perspectives from bloggers and an active community, the pages of EveryJoe are your destination for knowledge, entertainment and news.

EveryJoe is for men who don’t have time to surf the endless reaches of the web. You know what you like to read regularly but you like having tastes of other areas readily available at the click of a button. You work hard and you play hard, and EveryJoe helps you do that.

wright-perspectiveThe opening of my first article for them is an introduction of myself:

I often introduce myself as a recovering libertarian. It is not an entirely serious introduction, but it is not entirely frivolous either.

Why “recovering”? Sad experience teaches that any ideology, even a sound one, like libertarianism, is intoxicating. The appeal of ideology is the appeal of elegance. Just as Newton reduced all motions from the orbits to apples falling to three expressions, every intellectual craves a simple formula to explain the human condition. Libertarianism is based on a single principle that limits the state’s use of force to retaliation against fraud and trespass.

Nearly all the natural moral rules all men carry in their hearts are satisfied by the simple rule that you may do as you like provided you leave your neighbor free to do as he likes. No neighbor may rob, defraud nor attack another.

The intoxication comes with each case that fits neatly to the theory. Natural morality agrees that wars to defend the innocent are permissible, as is killing in self defense. Natural morality agrees that a man should keep his contracts, and so on.

The theory says the state must remain carefully neutral in all cultural and moral questions: the use of intoxicating drugs for recreational use, suicide assisted or no, polygamy, prostitution, gambling, pornography, duels to the death (provided only all participants fully agree!) or, for that matter, copulating with a corpse on the roof of your house in plain view of the neighbors’ children playing in their backyards, and then eating the corpse, all must be legal.

For me, the intoxicating spell ended in three sharp realizations, each one as forceful as a thunderbolt.

Read the rest here:

http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/05/07/politics/why-im-no-longer-libertarian/

————————————–

ADDENDUM: I have the honor to share the paper with Col Kratman. Here is the announcement and the link:

On Monday we launched Colonel Kratman’s column, “Lines of Departure”. I’m pleased to announce that it is now the most-commented piece of content we’ve had in the site’s history. Instapundit was kind enough to provide an inbound link which definitely helped the launch.

http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/05/05/politics/soldiers-deserve-better-weapons/

76 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Heinlein, Hugos, and Hogwash

Posted May 7, 2014 By John C Wright

The Intercollegiate Review is a print magazine and daily site for conservative students. You’ll hear from leading voices in the conservative movement, get activist tips from top student leaders, learn how to thrive in the face of the liberal campus culture, and more.

They were kind enough to solicit from me one of my better articles, never before seen, and particularly apt at the present time:

When the genre known for its dystopian fiction, tales of thought control, censorship, and mass conformity, begins to exhibit the traits it supposedly deplores, what is a writer of integrity to do? John C. Wright provides an insider’s exposition

http://www.intercollegiatereview.com/index.php/2014/05/07/heinlein-hugos-and-hogwash
big-brother-1984-ingsoc-gm-government-motors-general-motors-chocolate-rations-sad-hill-news

 

Robert Heinlein could not win a Hugo Award today.

If you are a fan of science fiction, you know how shocking that statement is. If you are not a science fiction fan, I salute you for having better things to do with your time than read stories about space princesses being rescued from bug-eyed monsters by stalwart and clean-limbed fighting men of Virginia; but please let me explain why this is shocking.

Robert Heinlein is without doubt the leading writer in the science fiction field. He was the first to break into the slick magazines or into hardcover. Were it not for him, science fiction would still be languishing in a literary ghetto, no more popular than niche-market stories about samurai or railroad executives.

He was a gadfly. Heinlein’s two most famous novels are Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land. The first challenges the orthodoxy of the Left as much as the second does the Right. But in his day, few science fiction readers were offended by his or anyone’s ideas. Science fiction was proud to be a literature of the new and startling. A spirit of intellectual fearlessness was paramount.

A darker time followed. The lamps of the intellect were put out one by one, first in society at large, then in literature, then in our little corner called science fiction. What we have now instead is a smothering fog of caution, of silence, of an unwillingness to speak for fear of offending the perpetually hypersensitive.

Science fiction is under the control of the thought police.

Read the rest here: http://www.intercollegiatereview.com/index.php/2014/05/07/heinlein-hugos-and-hogwash

58 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Infinitely Re-Read

Posted May 7, 2014 By John C Wright

The fine fellows over at SfSignal ask the musical question:

There are books we read once. There are books we re-read. And then there are the books that we wear out our copy because we devour it again and  again. The books we have to buy a copy for ourselves immediately upon  lending out our copy because we’re sure we will never see it again–or just  want to make sure we have it on hand.  What are some of these genre books for you? Why do you go back to them  again and again?

 

My answer: The primary purpose of nonfiction books is either to give us facts, give us insights based on facts, or to persuade or urge us into some course of action based on that insight. But the primary purpose of fiction is to slake the thirst we have for the magical waters which flow from worlds beyond the dry and bitter world of facts, to drink, to bathe, to be cleansed, to be refreshed, and to emerge shining from the baptism of the imagination to return to the dry wasteland of the factual world washed and prepared for battle. Science fiction and Fantasy form the deeper waters which carry us farther from the shore of this wasteland, and therefore provide deeper springs from which, through the imagination, to irrigate it.

Hence, those books which call a reader again and again to its wellsprings must be those which have particular power to restore what the factual world does not give him. By seeing what books never lose the power to refresh him, you can see what he most craves and yet which the world most fails to provide him.

You can see the rest of answer, and the answer of writers no doubt more insightful than I, by clicking the link: http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2014/05/mind-meld-books-weve-worn-out-re-reading/

It is perhaps the longest Mind Meld ever, and if you are looking for something new to read, you could do worse than finding out what your favorite authors’ favorite books are.

It is with grave sorrow that I see how few of these favorite books I have read or even heard about. In my youth, I read two books a day, and the field was small enough that an avid reader (and none was more avid than I) could be familiar with all the major and most of the minor works. These days, I have little time to read for pleasure, and what pleases me has narrowed, and so even bestsellers and awardwinners are strangers to me.

I am pleased to see authors praising Gaiman’s NEVERWHERE and Susan Cooper’s THE DARK IS RISING. In addition to being good books, both have arresting titles that catch the eye from even across the room. (Speaking of good titles, Laura Resnick has a brilliant one: MISFORTUNE COOKIE. Is that not a title that makes one’s eye simply water with desire to read the book? I have no idea what the book is about, but that title hooked my curiosity.)

It is a topic for another article, or perhaps for another Mind Meld, but what titles strike you as the most evocative, the best able to pique one’s curiosity? My vote for this category would be THE DYING EARTH by Jack Vance and THE WELL AT THE WORLD’S END by William Morris. The first, with merely two words almost never seen in conjunction (Animals and man die, or even nations, but the Earth?) and this immediately evokes a sense of peculiar desolation akin to awe. It promises a sense of wonder.

As for the second, if you cannot see the sheer magic in a title like THE WELL AT THE WORLD’S END, then you are no true traveler of Elfin Lands, nor ever sailed the haunted seas beyond the twilight.

24 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Atlas Shugs and Reads My Theory

Posted May 7, 2014 By John C Wright

There is a survivalist and Objectivist website called SHRUGGING OUT PODCAST much taken with the Evan Sayet theory I wrote about not long ago.

There is some talk of chickens and farming until about 8:45, which is a noble calling, to be sure. He discusses the title of the essay until about 14:30, not noticing that I actually think Leftism is nothing so innocent as a mere mental disease, but is willful cooperating with sin, namely, the sin of pride disguised as compassion.

At around 14:30 he begins to discuss the theory itself, with an adroit summation.

Here is the podcast.

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Parable of the Circular Train

Posted May 7, 2014 By John C Wright

A reader asks:

“What, then, is the distinction between ‘universe’ as used by radical materialists and God understood in the sense of Unmoved Mover, Being Itself, etc?”

A fascinating question, and an easy one to answer, but the answer requires some explanation.

Materialism is the proposition that all things have no properties aside from material properties.

If this it true, then everything which might seem to be a non-material property is actually a side effect of a material property and ultimately can be reduced to it. For example, ‘red’ seems to be a quality rather than a material property, but modern science shows redness is a wavelength of light, which has wavelike properties akin to soundwaves, and these wavelengths have pure material properties such as mass, length, duration and temperature.

But if materialism is true, then not just ‘red’ but all things, such as a pure Platonic ideal, human free will, truth or love or justice or any quality involving a valuation or purpose, an abstract law of logic, and on and on, can be ultimate reduced to waves and particles or some other physical property.

This leads to an immediate and obvious difficulty: physical things have no known final causes, that is, they react to outside pressure, they do not act because of a desire to achieve an envisioned goal or escape a feared outcome.

If materialism is true, all final causes can be reduced to mechanical causes.

Read the remainder of this entry »

11 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

FREE NIGHT LAND DAY!

Posted May 6, 2014 By John C Wright

It is novella length, so it is not a full book, but it takes place a kalpa of years from now, so you will still get your money’s worth. And by your money’s worth, I mean it is totally free of charge today and tomorrow (May 06 and May 07). Limited time offer!

This volume contains only one of my four ‘Night Land’ stories, but it is the best one:

http://www.amazon.com/Awake-Night-John-C-Wright-ebook/dp/B00K425CL6

Awake in the Night Final

Here is the official announcement:

In case you’re wondering what all the fuss is about, or despite the many excellent reviews you still have not been moved to put John C. Wright at the front of your reading list, today opportunity knocks as today and tomorrow, AWAKE IN THE NIGHT is free on Amazon.

The novella was included in the Years Best Science Fiction anthology published in 2004. It makes for an marvelous introduction to the terrors of the Night Land, as well as to the dark beauty of Mr. John C. Wright’s pen.

In not entirely unrelated news, I would like to thank you all for an astonishingly successful launch of Mr. Wright’s TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN. I expected it to be of significant interest to many of you, but I can’t honestly say that I expected this:

  • #1 in Books > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Science Fiction > History & Criticism
  • #1 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Nonfiction > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Good & Evil
  •  #1 in Kindle Store > Kindle eBooks > Literature & Fiction > History & Criticism > Criticism & Theory

 

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Instapundit and the World Crime League

Posted May 6, 2014 By John C Wright

Sarah Hoyt, who is not even a minion of mine, has done me the unsolicited honor of promoting my book on Instapundit:

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/188088/

And she speaks of herself in the third person. Could she be a Dark Lord (or, in her case, Dark Lady) in her own right? Does she have drug-maddened Dacoit assassins, a secret base hidden in a dormant volcano, and an army of human-ape hybrids created by insane Soviet science? It seems she does!

Is she the World’s Worst Person? I thought that was Larry Correia, International Lord of Hate?

Let us check the file photos to confirm:

Read the remainder of this entry »

51 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Outselling Sam Harris

Posted May 6, 2014 By John C Wright

Well, well, look at that. In the microscopic subcategory of ‘Philosophy of Good and Evil’ for the short hour as I write this, my first ever nonfiction book TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth outranks Sam Harris, atheist luminary and living lapse of logic! Let the joyous news be spread!

Outselling Sam HarrisThis is like the story of David and Goliath! Just like that story! Only if Goliath were a little old nearsighted lady from Peoria named Millicent Sopworth, and David was the local paperboy named Harmon Muldoon who zoomed by on his ten-speed bike and clocked her in the noggin with a rolled up newspaper, knocking her lacy hat with artificial flowers askew, and peddled away, laughing, leaving her bewildered but unhurt, in an incident that no one would ever notice or care about.

ADDED LATER:

Well, look at that! I am also number one in Science Fiction History and Criticism! An even smaller category of book sales! This is like Harmon Muldoon bopping a small dog on the rear as he bikes by!

transhuman_1_criticism

9 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Ad Copy

Posted May 6, 2014 By John C Wright

A reader with the triskdecaphiliac yet hundredfold name of Centurion 13 writes in about the ad copy describing TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN:

“one of science fiction’s greatest living masters.”

I … um, okay. Really? I can’t imagine this came from Mister Wright himself, as he seems quite humble. Is the hyperbole necessary?

My comment: You are correct that this is not the ad copy I wrote. “one of science fiction’s greatest living masters.” Indeed! Meh!

My original copy read this way:

Read the remainder of this entry »

9 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN is Now Here!

Posted May 5, 2014 By John C Wright

Castalia House is deeply honored to announce the publication of what we believe is the most important book about science fiction in years, TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth by John C. Wright. The 369-page book is comprised of sixteen essays originally written by Mr. Wright for his journal, which have been edited, and in a number of cases, collated from more than one journal posting, by Mr. Wright.

Read the remainder of this entry »

34 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Awake in the Night is Here!

Posted May 5, 2014 By John C Wright

Castalia House is putting out the first novella in the AWAKE IN THE NIGHT LAND quartet as its own ebook.

Read the remainder of this entry »

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Klavan and Whittle answer my Question

Posted May 3, 2014 By John C Wright

Well, that is …. surprising. I turned on this video and saw my two favorite conservative commentators talking about my favorite topic. Then I heard my name.
This is my question! Wow.
http://www.pjtv.com/s/GI4DANBS

I think this is on the nonmember side. Someone tell me if you can see what is behind the link.

22 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Coming Soon! TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN

Posted May 2, 2014 By John C Wright

TRANSHUMAN AND SUBHUMAN Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth.

Here is a preview.

Read the remainder of this entry »

19 Comments so far. Join the Conversation