Archive for February, 2015

This is why I like Mr May

Posted February 6, 2015 By John C Wright

Writing as ‘Fail Burton’ Mr May leaves this comment over on the Breitbart website:

Back in the real world, Ann Leckie’s supposedly great SF novel got whipped at Goodreads by The Martian 30,000 to 3,000. That’s what happens outside their racist blogs and Twitter feeds and echo chambers. By that standard, The Martian is then the greatest SF novel of all time times 10 since Leckie’s swept almost every award for the first time in SFF history. The Martian never had to stand in front of a Central Committee and be judged as white or male.

Amen, and preach the good news, brother!

Meanwhile, in other news, the Social Justice Lunatics are frothing and hallucinating in typical fashion in the comments section of the same article. I suggest any reader with a strong stomach and time to kill heat up a bag of popcorn in the futuristic microwave-radition ovens we have here in the future, and read some of the antics. See here: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/02/05/the-hugo-wars-how-sci-fis-most-prestigious-awards-became-a-political-battleground/

35 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Breitbart on Sad Puppies

Posted February 5, 2015 By John C Wright

Some much needed publicity.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/02/05/the-hugo-wars-how-sci-fis-most-prestigious-awards-became-a-political-battleground/

Few walks of life are today immune to the spectre of political intolerance. At universities, speaker disinvitations and censorship campaigns are at an all-time high. In technology, there are purges of chief executives with the wrong political views and executives who make the wrong sort of joke. In the world of video games, petitions are launched against “offensive” titles, and progressive journalists wage smear campaigns against conservative developers.

It may not, therefore, surprise you to learn that similar occurrences are taking place in the science-fiction and fantasy (SFF) community, too. Previously a world renowned for the breadth of its perspectives, SFF increasingly bears the familiar hallmarks of an ideological battleground.

The story begins, as ever, with a small group of social justice-minded community elites who sought to establish themselves as the arbiters of social mores. This group would decide who deserved a presence in SFF and who deserved to be ostracised.

Their victims are littered across the SFF community. In 2013, the Bulletin of the Science Fiction Writers of America (SFWA) were targeted by a shirtstorm-like cyber-mob of digital puritans after one of their cover editions was deemed to be “too sexual.” The controversy did not die down until two of its most respected writers, Mike Resnick and Barry Malzburg, were dismissed from the publication. This occurred despite a vigorous counter-campaign by liberal members of the sci-fi community, including twelve Nebula award winners and three former presidents of the SFWA. 

Unfortunately, the current crop of elite figures in the SFF community have become either apologists or out-and-out cheerleaders for intolerance and censorship. Redshirts author John Scalzi, a close friend of  anti-anonymity crusader Wil Wheaton – was head of the SFWA at the time of the controversy and quickly caved in to activist pressure. This was unsurprising, given that he shared many of their identitarian views.

But Scalzi is, if anything, merely the moderate ally of a far more radical group of community elites. He hasn’t gone nearly as far as former SFWA Vice President Mary Kowal, who handles political disagreement by telling her opponents to “shut the fuck up” and quit the SFWA. Or former Hugo nominee Nora Jemisin, who says that political tolerance “disturbs” her. Or, indeed, the prolific fantasy author Jim C. Hines, who believes that people who satirize religion and political ideologies (a very particular religion, and a very particular ideology, of course) should be thrown out of mainstream SFF magazines.

Read the whole thing. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/02/05/the-hugo-wars-how-sci-fis-most-prestigious-awards-became-a-political-battleground/

Read the remainder of this entry »

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Brad R Torgersen on False Advertising in SFF

Posted February 5, 2015 By John C Wright

Brad R Torgersen pens a clear and brilliant explanation of an otherwise inexplicable phenomenon:

Depending on who you ask, the Hugos are broken because they are either too insular (this is part of the SAD PUPPIES theory) or too easily manipulated by outside voting blocs (the “fandom purist” theory) or because “fandom” itself is still too white, too straight, and too cisnormative (Call this the “Grievance Studies theory”) or even that the Hugos spend too much time dwelling on popular works, at the expense of real literature (the “pinky-in-the-air snob theory”) or that “fandom” simply falls into predictable ruts, and is easily swayed by sparkly bellwethers, such as the Nebulas.

I want to introduce another theory. One that others have spoken of before. I call it the “Unreliable packaging” theory. And it’s afflicting not just the Hugos, but the SF/F literary field as a whole. As witnessed by (yet another spate of) declining SF/F sales at the bookstores.

Imagine for a moment that you go to the local grocery to buy a box of cereal. You are an avid enthusiast for Nutty Nuggets. You will happily eat Nutty Nuggets until you die. Nutty Nuggets have always come in the same kind of box with the same logo and the same lettering. You could find the Nutty Nuggets even in the dark, with a blindfold over your eyes. That’s how much you love them.

Then, one day, you get home from the store, pour a big bowl of Nutty Nuggets . . . and discover that these aren’t really Nutty Nuggets. They came in the same box with the same lettering and the same logo, but they are something else …  The contents are something different.

[…]

That’s what’s happened to Science Fiction & Fantasy literature. A few decades ago, if you saw a lovely spaceship on a book cover, with a gorgeous planet in the background, you could be pretty sure you were going to get a rousing space adventure featuring starships and distant, amazing worlds. If you saw a barbarian swinging an axe? You were going to get a rousing fantasy epic with broad-chested heroes who slay monsters, and run off with beautiful women. Battle-armored interstellar jump troops shooting up alien invaders? Yup. A gritty military SF war story, where the humans defeat the odds and save the Earth. And so on, and so forth.

These days, you can’t be sure.

Read the whole thing. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/sad-puppies-3-the-unraveling-of-an-unreliable-field/

Read the remainder of this entry »

16 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

pens the following essay on the growth and construction of a manuscript over at the Superversive blog.

http://superversivesf.com/2015/02/05/the-life-cycle-of-a-manuscript/

Honestly, my approach to preparing works for submission has varied depending on the length, market, and even genre of the piece; and my system continues to evolve as I learn more from experience and research. (NB: I highly recommend On Writing by Stephen King, especially for newcomers to the craft.)

On Writing: 10th Anniversary Edition: A Memoir of the CraftNevertheless, I thought I’d give a rundown of my current favored method for writing and revising manuscripts. Who knows? Someone may find it useful.

Outline: most fiction authors create outlines of their novels before the writing actually starts. There’s no set format or length for outlines; they can range in size from scene-by-scene summaries of the book to one or two page sketches. Some authors (like King) don’t outline at all. Trial and error have shown me that I am not one of them. My novel outlines generally run 5-10 pages; for short stories it’s usually 1 or 2–enough to set the bounds of the story and chart the narrative structure.

By way of explanation, I tend to structure each of my novels as a succession of multiple three act or seven point narratives within an overarching frame. So I make sure to note every hook, complication, climax, and resolution in the outline.

First Draft: when I start writing, I more or less follow the outline, filling in the blanks while giving myself enough flexibility to draw outside the lines if it serves the story. I estimate that I stick to the outline about 60 percent of the time, and about 40 percent is improvised.

Only I ever see my first draft. It’s not for anyone else.

[…]

Editing: so far, I’ve had one novel-length manuscript professionally edited. I was so impressed with the results, provided by the brilliantly superversive L. Jagi Lamplighter, that I plan on hiring a knowledgeable, experienced freelancer to edit every novel that I intend to publish independently.

Read the whole thing: http://superversivesf.com/2015/02/05/the-life-cycle-of-a-manuscript/

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The International Lord of Hate needs Your Help

Posted February 4, 2015 By John C Wright

A message from Larry Correia:

Need Your Help (gathering links to SJW attacks in sci-fi for a news reporter)

Hey, Monster Hunter Nation and Sad Puppies Supporters, I’ve been approached by a major media outlet gathering information about our little corner of the culture war.

I mentioned bias, and specifically anti-conservative bias among the voters. They asked if I had links to blog posts, comments, etc.

I don’t keep track of most of what these people say about us. Honestly you can only get called a racist hate monger by so many crazy people before it just becomes background noise. So if you guys don’t mind, would you please post your favorites in the comments below.

James May/Fail Burton specifically, I know you are like the archivist of their racist Twitter posts. Time to bust out the files!

Don’t leave your information here, please. Go over to Monster Hunter International and post your replies there.

5 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

White House Terrorist Identification Chart

Posted February 3, 2015 By John C Wright

Swiped from Michael Ramirez (http://www.investors.com/editorial-cartoons/michael-ramirez/737198-identification-chart)

white house id chart

24 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Rabid Puppies Sample Ballot

Posted February 3, 2015 By John C Wright

An announcement from my Publisher: the words below are his. I urge everyone to click through the link to my story “The Parliament of Beasts and Birds” which he has made available on his website.

Rabid Puppies 2015

We of the science fiction Right do not march in lockstep or agree on everything. We span a fairly wide variety of political perspectives and we have very different opinions concerning the optimal way to deal with the corruption and ideological rot that is rife within the world of modern science fiction and fantasy. My recommendations for the Hugo Awards last year were not precisely the same as Larry Correia’s in Sad Puppies 2, nor are they identical to Brad Torgersen’s recommendations in Sad Puppies 3. But they are similar because we value excellence in actual science fiction and fantasy, rather than excellence in intersectional equalitarianism, racial and gender inclusion, literary pyrotechnics, or professional rabbitology.

What follows is the list of Hugo recommendations known as Rabid Puppies. They are my recommendations for the 2015 nominations, and I encourage those who value my opinion on matters related to science fiction and fantasy to nominate them precisely as they are. I think it is abundantly evident that these various and meritorious works put not only last year’s nominations, but last year’s winners, to shame.

BEST NOVEL

Monster Hunter Nemesis by Larry Correia, Baen Books
The Chaplain’s War by Brad Torgersen, Baen Books
Skin Game by Jim Butcher, ROC
Lines of Departure, by Marko Kloos, self-published
The Dark Between the Stars by Kevin J. Anderson, Tor Books

BEST NOVELLA

“One Bright Star to Guide Them” by John C. Wright, Castalia House (Spanish)
“Big Boys Don’t Cry” by Tom Kratman, Castalia House (German, Italian)
“The Jenregar and the Light” by Dave Creek, Analog October 2014
“The Plural of Helen of Troy” by John C. Wright, City Beyond Time / Castalia House
“Flow” by Arlan Andrews Sr., Analog November 2014

BEST NOVELETTE

“Yes, Virginia, There is a Santa Claus” by John C. Wright, The Book of Feasts & Seasons
“The Journeyman: In the Stone House” by Michael F. Flynn, Analog June 2014
“Championship B’tok” by Edward M. Lerner, Analog Sept 2014
“The Triple Sun: A Golden Age Tale”, by Rajnar Vajra, Analog July/Aug 2014
“Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust, Earth to Alluvium” by Gray Rinehart, Orson Scott Card’s InterGalactic Medicine Show

BEST SHORT STORY

“Turncoat” by Steve Rzasa, Riding the Red Horse
“The Parliament of Beasts and Birds” by John C. Wright, The Book of Feasts & Seasons
“Goodnight Stars” by Annie Bellet, The Apocalypse Triptych
“Tuesdays With Molakesh the Destroyer” by Megan Grey, Fireside Fiction
“Totaled” by Kary English, Galaxy’s Edge

BEST RELATED WORK

Transhuman and Subhuman: Essays on Science Fiction and Awful Truth, by John C. Wright, Castalia House
“The Hot Equations: Thermodynamics and Military SF” by Ken Burnside, Riding the Red Horse / Castalia House
“Wisdom From My Internet” by Michael Z. Williamson, self-published
“The Science is Never Settled” by Tedd Roberts, Baen Free Library
“Letters from Gardner” by Lou Antonelli, Sci Phi Journal #3

Read the remainder of this entry »

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Tale of Two Comments

Posted February 3, 2015 By John C Wright

There is a scene in ATLAS SHRUGGED where Dagny is astonished that the crowd cannot tell that John Galt is the hero and that the little men around him are whining rotters merely at a glance, and she is nigh lightheaded with indignation and surprise. How could they not see? Who cannot tell the difference between darkness and light?

I understand her frustration.

Today, on the same day, on the same topic, I came across these two quotes concerning the efforts of disenfranchised and excluded science fiction writers trying to combine into a voting bloc to get our names on the Hugo ballot. We are excluded because, and only because, we put story-telling above sermon-preaching. Leftwing nutjobs (but I repeat myself) indulge in sermon-preaching at the expense of story-telling.

The difference is that the jester who tells a story serves the king, and wants to make His Majesty smile. The sour but bossy busybody who lectures her charges want them to serve her, conform, and obey. She wants them to make her stop frowning.

Deep down, it seems the Left do not even like story-telling, because story serve truth and joy; stories praise heroism and serve as examples of love and self-sacrifice.

The Left likes lies. Joyful men are hard to control, hard to convince, hard to break to spur and crop.

The Left regards joy as childish, and despair as the truly sober and mature frame of mind in which one should bow to Tsathoggua the Toad-God of Hyperborea, or Yg-Yralkh the Terrible in the Eighth Dimensional Dominion of the Living Brain Slime, or whatever unholy creature the Leftists actually do worship, such as Mao or Che.

Read the remainder of this entry »

21 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Yesss, Preciousss…

Posted February 2, 2015 By John C Wright

Leftists cannot be reasoned with, because Leftism is the embrace of unreason. Case in point: an article from the news, which I reprint in whole. My comments below.

Texas Fourth-Grader Suspended For Telling Classmate He Could Make Him ‘Disappear’ With Magic Ring

A 9-year-old boy in Texas was suspended after he told a classmate he could make him “disappear” with a magic ring from the fictional Lord of the Rings films.

Aiden Steward of Kermit, Texas, had just watched a film from the Hobbit series of movies with his family, returned to school excited and imaginative. He playfully made the comment to his classmate while pretending to wield the powers of the magic ring. Aiden was subsequently suspended for making a “terroristic threat” toward the student.

“It sounded unbelievable,” Aiden’s father, Jason Steward, said. Steward said his son assured him that he “didn’t mean anything by it.”

“Kids act out movies that they see,” Steward said. “When I watched Superman as a kid, I went outside and tried to fly.”

 The Steward family, who moved to Kermit only six months ago, has already seen a fair amount of trouble with the school district. Aiden was suspended twice before the ring incident — once for referring to a fellow student as “black” and a second time for bringing his favorite book, “The Big Book of Knowledge,” with him to school.

“He loves that book. They were studying the solar system and he took it to school. He thought his teacher would be impressed,” Steward said.

The school’s principal, Roxanne Greer, declined to comment on the incident. Greer said that all student-related matters are “confidential.”

Jason Steward reportedly requested something in writing from the school confirming his son’s suspension and explaining why they suspended him. He was later told that they would put a letter in the mail.

“I assure you my son lacks the magical powers necessary to threaten his friend’s existence,” Steward wrote in an email. “If he did, I’m sure he’d bring him right back.”

Power is about the ability to do stupid and arbitrary things. Leftism is lust for power disguised in various unconvincing guises.

Did you really, honestly, truly think that the government wanted government-run, compulsory schools in order to educate them? That Caesar was doing something for your benefit, not his?

Yes, schools do actually educate the student in one thing: it is drilled into the wee little bairn’s head that his lords and his masters are absolute, arbitrary and insane, and that resistance is futile.

When government schooling functions as designed, it breaks their spirit and makes them little cynics, little weaklings, and little cowards.

From time to time exceptional teachers fight the current, and manage to teach your children other lessons, but those teachers are easily rendered mute and impotent by similar tactics.

43 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

How to Deal with Compliments in a Dignified Fashion

Posted February 2, 2015 By John C Wright

If a writer you admire pays you the highest compliment you can imagine, what is one supposed to do? Vaunt like a pagan? Be humble like a Christian? Giggle like a schoolgirl at a slumber party eating an entire tub of rocky road ice cream with her giggling friends? Raise an eyebrow like Spock and display no emotion?

It matters not. I am gratified to find my opinion carries such weight among my fellow Evil Legionnaires of Evil.

Mr. Larry Correia describes on his blog his desire to retire from the Sad Puppies tempest in a thimble, but that certain evil forces dragged him back in.

Then the ELoE told me tough luck, and that if I dropped out, my fans (who make up the back bone of the growing Sad Puppies contingent) would get mad at me. Plus, John Wright said that MHN was my best book, and his vote for best book of 2014. And you really can’t argue with somebody who writes like John.

Read the remainder of this entry »

5 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Snubbed by Locus

Posted February 2, 2015 By John C Wright

Mr Glyer at 770 reports, perhaps with the slightest hint of schadenfreude in his tone, that none of the Sad Puppies slate for last year were included in the Locus Recommended Reading list for 2015. His column is here: http://file770.com/?p=20678 .

Now, if this Locus list is being presented as evidence for the proposition that all non-Leftist Science Fiction authors are without merit, and that the voting patterns of Worldcon are therefore justified, hence cleared of the charges of favoritism and political correctness leveled by Sad Puppies, then it has failed of that purpose, at least insofar as the first few comments interpret the matter. For them, the list is being taken as evidence not that Worldcon is cleared of favoritism and Left-leaning bias, but only that Locus shares it, and therefore can no longer be trusted (if it ever was) to be a neutral and objective judge reporting on the science fiction field.

The support of my work by the comments beneath the 770 article is very gratifying to me. I notice the only comment posted as of the time of this writing (2/2/2015) that is in the least negative is from someone who has not read the work, and is merely speculating as to what may have prompted Locus to leave me off their list.

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

SAD PUPPIES 3: announces its 2015 Hugo sample slate

Posted February 2, 2015 By John C Wright

Here is the announcement from the official Sad Puppies Sample Ballot, from Sad Puppies central, as compiled by Brad R. Torgersen. The words below are his:

And here it is! After much combobulating, the official SAD PUPPIES 3 slate is assembled! As noted earlier in the year, the SAD PUPPIES 3 list is a recommendation. Not an absolute. Assembled here is the best list (we think!) of entirely deserving works, writers, and editors — all of whom would not otherwise find themselves on the Hugo ballot without some extra oomph received from beyond the rarefied, insular halls of 21st century Worldcon “fandom.”

Which is where YOU guys come in. Everyone who’s signed up as a full or supporting member of either Loncon 3 (last year’s Worldcon) or Sasquan (this year’s Worldcon) or MidAmeriCon II (next year’s Worldcon.) If you agree with our slate below — and we suspect you might — this is YOUR chance to make sure YOUR voice is heard. This is YOUR award (as SF/F’s self-proclaimed “most prestigious award”) and YOU get to have a say in who is acknowledged.

Remember: only YOU can combat puppy-related sadness! Read the remainder of this entry »

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Dinosaur-sized bigotry

Posted February 1, 2015 By John C Wright

Sarah Hoyt speaks at length about the disturbing nature of the short story ‘If You Were a Dinosaur, My Love‘ by Rachel Swirsky which was a story I could — and did — do a better version of in one sitting, in less than an afternoon. And I did it without ripping off IF YOU GIVE  A MOUSE A COOKIE. Now my yarn might not be to your taste, but at least it is a story, with a beginning, middle and end, characters, and all the other apparatus of a story; and it contains science fiction. That makes it a (1) science fiction (2) story. Miss Swirsky’s work is neither.

I, for one, congratulate rather than belittle Miss Swirsky for her award. She deserves heartfelt congratulations. It is the voters I belittle. They betrayed their trust. They deserve the whipping post.

Sarah Hoyt talks about what the story’s choice of theme and antagonist implies:

http://accordingtohoyt.com/2015/01/31/if-you-were-a-grown-up-my-love/

When I was very young I used to think that stories where everyone died, or stories where pointless but sad things happened were about the best thing ever. They were profound and so different from every other story I’d read till that time which were all boys-adventures or fairytales that ended well and with a moral.

If You Were A Dinosaur my Love’s win bothered me at a level I can’t begin to explain, and it still bothers me, like an aching tooth to which the tongue keeps returning.  It’s not just that could have been written by me at 12 and would have got, from my middle school teacher, exactly the sort of praise it got from science fiction professionals.

It’s the ideas packed into the story that are truly disturbing.

A story that reveals a total lack of knowledge of an entire class of people (manual laborers) and instead others them as sort of scary all purpose evil that will beat to death anyone who doesn’t look/act like them won an award voted on by – supposedly – adult professionals. Not only that, but adult professionals who keep claiming their tolerance and love of the “other.”  What’s more, adult professionals who would almost certainly embrace “Marxism” as a good or at least correct idea.  When did Marxists start loathing and fearing the working class?

And admitting it?

Read the whole thing. I found it shocking. Her remarks open up the gangrenous wound and show the maggots already swarming among the dying flesh.

Read the remainder of this entry »

73 Comments so far. Join the Conversation