When the Ox Mocks the Bull

Posted March 22, 2016 By John C Wright

This is from a conversation between one Damien Walter, professional ignoramus who has continually failed to finish a novel the Queen’s loyal taxpayers in England are forced to pay him to write, and Paul Weimer, who at one time considered himself my friend.

Daimien

As Declann Finn points out, this announcement, or prediction, or clapping-for-Tinkerbell invocation-by-playing-pretend, or whatever it is, claiming my pro writing career is over, happened on March 19. My latest novel came out for sale on March 17th. I have two more books coming out from Tor, and two more from Castalia House, and five more I am obligated to write.

Not to mention I have just be hired by a magazine publisher to write two more projects of which I have no permission to speak in public (cross your fingers on that one, because, not being paid by the Queen’s loyal taxpayer’s against their will, the finances on that one are still up in the air.)

Pathetic.

However, hearing this child call me and mine craven requires a more thorough dressing down. Allow me to unlimber my spleen in more detail.

Read the remainder of this entry »

27 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Rabid Puppies List

Posted March 21, 2016 By John C Wright

Vox Day, Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil Authors (of which I have the honor to be a founding member and Grand Inquisitor) announces suggested nominations voters should consider voting onto the shortlist. The words below are his:

RP_2016_small

BEST NOVEL

  • Seveneves: A Novel, Neal Stephenson, William Morrow
  • Golden Son, Pierce Brown, Del Rey
  • Somewhither: A Tale of the Unwithering Realm, John C. Wright, Castalia House
  • The Cinder Spires: The Aeronaut’s Windlass, Jim Butcher, Roc
  • Agent of the Imperium, Marc Miller, Far Future

BEST NOVELLA

  • “Fear and Self-Loathing in Hollywood”, Nick Cole, Amazon Digital Services
  • “Penric’s Demon”, Lois McMaster Bujold, Spectrum
  • “Perfect State”, Brandon Sanderson, Dragonsteel Entertainment
  • “The Builders”, Daniel Polansky, Tor.com
  • “Slow Bullets”, Alastair Reynolds, Tachyon Publications

BEST NOVELETTE

  • “Flashpoint: Titan”, Kai Wai Cheah, There Will Be War Vol. X, Castalia House
  • “Folding Beijing”, Hao Jingfang, Uncanny Magazine
  • “What Price Humanity?”, David VanDyke,There Will Be War Vol. X, Castalia House
  • “Hyperspace Demons”, Jonathan Moeller, Castalia House
  • “Obits”, Stephen King, The Bazaar of Bad Dreams, Scribner

BEST SHORT STORY

  • “Asymmetrical Warfare”, S. R. Algernon,Nature Nr. 519
  • “Seven Kill Tiger”, Charles Shao, There Will Be War Vol. X, Castalia House
  • “The Commuter”, Thomas Mays, Amazon Digital Services
  • If You Were an Award, My Love“, Juan Tabo and S. Harris, Vox Popoli
  • “Space Raptor Butt Invasion”, Chuck Tingle, Amazon Digital Services

BEST RELATED WORK 

Read the remainder of this entry »

4 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Hugo Nomination Deadline is Approaching

Posted March 18, 2016 By John C Wright

There are just two weeks left in the nomination period for the 2016 Hugo Awards and the 1941 Retro Hugo Awards! Nominations will be accepted through March 31, 2016 at 11:59 pm PDT.

Even if you have already submitted nominations, you may update your selections (either electronically or by mail) as long as the nomination period continues. If you are submitting your nominations electronically, we recommend you do so in advance of the deadline to avoid any problems in the final hours when the system will be very busy.

You can find all the details for this process and the nominating ballots at the MidAmeriCon II website at http://midamericon2.org/the-hugo-awards/hugo-nominations/ .

The Hugo Awards are fan-run, fan-given, and fan-supported. But only for the right kinds of fans. Wrongfans get a wooden asshole instead of a spaceship.

We recommend that you nominate whatever works and creators you have personally read or viewed that were your favorites from 2015 and 1940. But only for the right kind of favorites. Reading wrongbooks by wrongpros is not necessary: merely vote No Award.

The administrators and staff of MidAmeriCon II want to emphasize that science fiction has nothing whatsoever to do with the award. Voting should be strictly in the service of the political goals of the far left.

 

RP_2016_small

 

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Sad Puppies 4 The List

Posted March 18, 2016 By John C Wright

Sad Puppies 4 has released their suggested list of Hugo nominations.

http://madgeniusclub.com/2016/03/17/the-list/

Full doc is here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3xQY43MM8pKR3JSLUdrcGpGek0/view

I am delighted to note who is at the top of the list with the most votes and positive comments!

Best Novel

Somewhither – John C Wright
Honor At Stake – Declan Finn
The Cinder Spires: The Aeronaut’s Windlass – Jim Butcher
Uprooted – Naomi Novik
A Long Time Until Now – Michael Z Williamson
Seveneves – Neal Stephenson
Son of the Black Sword – Larry Correia
Strands of Sorrow – John Ringo
Nethereal – Brian Niemeier
Ancillary Mercy – Ann Leckie

Best Novella

Binti – Nnedi Okorafor
Penric’s Demon – Lois McMaster Bujold
Slow Bullets – Alastair Reynolds
Perfect State – Brandon Sanderson
The End of All Things 1: The Life of the Mind – John Scalzi
Speak Easy – Catherynne M Valente
The Builders – Daniel Polansky

Best Novelette

And You Shall Know Her By The Trail Of Dead – Brooke Bolander
Pure Attentions – T R Dillon
Folding Beijing – Hao Jingfang translated by Ken Liu
If I Had No Head and My Eyes Were Floating Way Up In the Air – Clifford D Simak
Obits – Stephen King
Our Lady of the Open Road – Sarah Pinsker

Best Short Story

Tuesdays With Molakesh The Destroyer – Megan Grey
Today I am Paul – Martin L Shoemaker
… And I Show You How Deep the Rabbit Hole Goes – Scott Alexander
Asymmetrical Warfare – S R Algernon
Cat Pictures, Please – Naomi Kritzer
Damage – David Levine
A Flat Effect – Eric Flint
Daedelus – Niall Burke
Hungry Daughters of Starving Mothers – Alyssa Wong
I am Graalnak of the Vroon Empire, Destroyer of Galaxies, Supreme Overlord of the Planet Earth. Ask Me Anything – Laura Pearlman

Best Related Work

Sad Puppies Bite Back – Declan Finn
Appendix N – Jeffro Johnson
Safe Space as Rape Room: Science Fiction Culture and Childhood’s End – Daniel
A History of Epic Fantasy – Adam Whitehead
Atomic Rockets – Winchell Chung
Legosity – Tom Simon
There Will Be War Vol X – Edited Jerry Pournelle
You’re Never Weird on the Internet (Almost) – Felicia Day
Frazetta Sketchbook Number 2
Galactic Journey – http://galacticjourney.org/

As with last year. we AstroTurf gamergaters, wifebeaters, neonazis, Klansmen, and utter outsiders who know nothing about science fiction and fantasy should invade the safe and private areas of a genre alien to us.

We are motivated solely by fear, loathing and malice toward blacks, women, gays and minorities, whose growing power robs us of our ill-gotten white privilege, and, for some reason, our desire to express this ferocious illwill takes the form of casting votes for science fiction stories based on merit and not on race or sex.

Remember: do not read a single word or letter of any of these works. This is a slate vote. You are mindless robotic zombies, as soulless as Daleks. Except you don’t know was a Dalek is, because we don’t read science fiction.

Just kidding. In reality,  I wrote SOMEWITHER Because I love my readers, and wanted to write a book to delight those who love the SF genre I love, regardless of whatever nonsense these mentally disturbed leftwing ninnies are always yammering and clamoring about.

Dear Reader, I don’t care about your skin color, sex, or private sins. They are none of my business and the topics are insufferably boring to me. I could not make myself care about them if I wanted to.

I care about whether readers like good SF.

I care about the science, the wonder, the terror, the adventure, the speculation, the intellectual exercise, the wisdom and the folly, the glory and the shame, the insight into human nature, and, for that matter, alien nature.

I care about all the shining wit and brilliance and lyricism of dreams of far tomorrows captured in the covers of a beloved book.

The Morlocks who scream their mindless hate and scorn know nothing of me. They  selected me as a target of their hate, as best I can tell, precisely because I am innocent of everything of which I am accused. They would not need to rewrite misquotes to make them sound damning if my real words, real thoughts, and real opinions were anything like what they needed for their Two Minute Hate.

These are sick, sad, broken people, tormented by their smothered and inflamed consciences, and in their pain they lash out at whatever and whoever is good, virtuous, truthful, wholesome, decent and normal, because the mere sight of anything good redoubles their self-torture, shames them, and deepens their despair.

Prayer for their souls, not anger at their anger, is the proper response.

Prayer for Patrick Hayden, the editor at Tor primarily responsible for corrupting and politicizing the Hugo Awards, is particularly important. He is a Christian who has lost his way to Christ, thrown his lamp away and poked out his own eyes, so he stumbles through mazes of his own making following hallucinatory afterimages produced by light-starvation, and thinking these are guiding stars that lead him true.

His is a foe of Christ and an enemy of the Church, but is so far lost, that he cannot even hear the shepherd’s voice calling him out of the wolf den. Pray for his wrecked and wretched soul.

And then go nominate my novel. Because Tor decided not to publish it, and their noses should be rubbed in the mess their putting PC above SF has made for them.

 

 

 

32 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Iron Chamber of Memory

Posted March 17, 2016 By John C Wright

A St. Patrick’s Day gift to my loyal fans, both of them:

The small island of Sark in the English Channel is the last feudal government in Europe. By law, no motor vehicles run on the road, and no lights burn at night. Only the lord of the island may keep hounds.Into the strange, high house of Wrongerwood wanders Hal Landfall, penniless graduate student at Magdalen College, looking for his missing friend Manfred Hathaway, who has just inherited the lordship, the house, and the island. What he finds instead is the lovely, green-eyed Laurel, a beautiful girl from Cornwall who is Manfred’s wife-to-be. 

There is said to be a haunted chamber in the house, erected by Merlin in ancient days, where a man who enters remembers his true and forgotten self. When Hal and Laurel step in, they remember, with fear and wonder, a terrible truth they must forget again when they step outside.

From the reviews:

  • “A wonderfully creepy, profound, sad and yet uplifting story. Wright’s latest is another fantastic and inventive piece from an author whose imaginative faculties boggle the mind.”
  • “There are few authors who can maintain extremely high 5-star quality in every single piece of work they produce. JCW is one of the very few grand-masters who manages to pull this off consistently.”
  • “It was a roller coaster ride, and I mean that in a great way. Few works have affected me like this novel.  I quit reading it twice in order to think about things.”

Iron Chamber of Memory, John C. Wright’s latest novel, is now available exclusively on Amazon. It is 242 pages, retails for $4.99, and is DRM-free.

Read the remainder of this entry »

71 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Superversive Blog: Interview with Frank Luke

Posted March 17, 2016 By John C Wright

Here is the link:
http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/2016/03/16/6198/

Some people feel Christians should not write fantasy. What is your take on this issue?

I’ve read some of those arguments. They never held water for me. I can’t see anything inherently sinful about writing fantasy. If it was, then Christians shouldn’t even read fantasy, but there is no argument you can make against reading fantasy that doesn’t cut out all fiction (read those, too). Granted, there are types of fiction that Christians should stay away from. I’ll just name two obvious ones: torture porn and erotica. But we aren’t talking about anything like that.

I write fantasy because it touches the spirit in ways that other genres don’t. One reader of Rebirths, a widower, said Derke’s grief over his wife’s death mirrored his own path through grief. I believe the breath of life that God gave our first parents is that human beings create art for art’s sake. We don’t paint to mark our territory. The primary purpose of song and dance is not to attract a mate. We do those things because we are creative, as God intended us to be. If you eliminate all forms of art, you eliminate life. God wants us to live life abundantly. Why would we even think of saying that the art of story telling is off limits to Christians? Instead, we should be writing the very best fantasy.

Two of the foundational fantasy authors were devout Christians, George MacDonald and Tolkein. Christians writing fantasy today aren’t entering Satan’s territory. We’re staking our place on the front lines of a war to keep what our predecessors started. Yeah, there’s a lot of junk out there in fantasy writing, but name one genre that doesn’t have junk. Those who say Christians shouldn’t write fantasy say we should be focusing on writing Bible studies. One reason they give is that there are a lot of junk Bible studies out there, so we need good Bible studies to combat the bad. That applies to fantasy and sci fi. The bad needs to be countered with the good.

Rebirths will be on sale for 0.99 from Wed the 16th of March until the 23rd.

Rebirths:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B013CDEI7M

To read more:

Franks blog:
http://frankluke.com/

Where he answers Bible questions: http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/users/363/frank-luke

Seven Deadly Tales:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B019BJAS3Y

 

.

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Voting for Hugo Nominations

Posted March 14, 2016 By John C Wright

Vox Day, Supreme Dark Lord of the Evil Legion of Evil Authors, has published a list of his recommendations for Hugo Nominations:

He says his whole list is not finalized, as he is making eligibility checks and examining an alternative or two in a few categories.

For the Best Novel category.

  • Seveneves: A Novel, Neal Stephenson
  • Golden Son, Pierce Brown 
  • Somewhither: A Tale of the Unwithering Realm, John C. Wright
  • The Cinder Spires: The Aeronaut’s Windlass, Jim Butcher
  • Agent of the Imperium, Marc Miller

For the Best Novella category.

  • “Fear and Self-Loathing in Hollywood”, Nick Cole
  • “Penric’s Demon”, Lois McMaster Bujold
  • “Hyperspace Demons”, Jonathan Moeller
  • “The Builders”, Daniel Polansky
  • “Slow Bullets”, Alastair Reynolds

For the Best Novelette category.

  • “Flashpoint: Titan”, Kai Wai Cheah
  • “Folding Beijing”, Hao Jingfang
  • “What Price Humanity?”, David VanDyke
  • “Space Raptor Butt Invasion”, Chuck Tingle
  • “Obits”, Stephen King

For the Best Short Story category:

  • “Tuesdays With Molakesh the Destroyer”, Megan Grey,Fireside Magazine
  • “Asymmetrical Warfare”, S. R. Algernon, Nature Nr. 519
  • “Seven Kill Tiger”, Charles Shao, There Will Be War Vol. X
  • “The Commuter”, Thomas Mays, Amazon Kindle Single
  • “If You Were an Award, My Love”, Juan Tabo and S. Harris, Vox Popoli

I, of course, would like voters to consider my short story:
“Scepter of Nowhere” Dark Discoveries: Issue 31, ed. James R. Beach, Spring 2015.

11 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Debaculous Fiasco of Dr. Seuss

Posted March 10, 2016 By John C Wright

Once upon a time, Dr. Seuss, world-famous children’s book author and illustrator, went to Hollywood and made a movie called THE 5000 FINGERS OF DR.T.

(His real name is Theodor S. Geisel, which I first learned because his nephew went to my High School.)

Dr. Seuss was responsible for the story, screenplay, lyrics, and set design. Unless Salvador Dali did the set design; hard to tell.

The good doctor was not at the peak of his fame, and so his name was not given top billing. This was before he wrote Horton Hears a Who! (1955), If I Ran the Circus (1956), The Cat in the Hat (1957), How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (1957), or Green Eggs and Ham (1960).

The music was by Frederick Hollander (a then-famous but unfairly forgotten great composer of the day) and won the 1953 Academy Award for ‘Best Scoring of a Musical Picture’.

This film was not, as it might seem, a sequel to THE MILLION EYES OF SUMARU or other films concerning monstrous person with excessive body parts.

Finger Beanie

It is a story of one Bartholomew Collins, a young boy wearing a beanie with a hand on top kept in a surrealistic musical school and prison guarded by an army of singing thugs and a pair of rollerskating Siamese Twins connected by their beard.

The Feared Siamese Beard

The institute is run by the ruthless yet maniacal Dr. Terwilliker, who is keeping all other musicians aside from piano players in a dungeon.

Dr Terwilliker

He plans to force 500 little boys to practice piano endlessly on a monstrous five thousand key piano, and then use the disintegration ray in his physics laboratory to disintegrate Gus Zabladowski, the plumber, atom by atom as soon as that unwitting but truehearting workingman is finished installing the last sink.

Hypno bride

And Dr. Terwilliker has the little boy’s mother, Mrs Collins, hypnotized into serving as his secretary and unwilling fiancee.

Lockmetight

The boy must convince the skeptical plumber of Dr. Terwilliker’s evil plans, and gain his aid to free his mother, and 499 other piano students, and stop the giant piano with an atomic-powered sound-fix, despite being outnumbered and alone with no one to believe him.

And despite being forced to practice finger exercises.

THE5,000FINGERS-SPTI-15

The visuals for this film are striking, perhaps unique. I am not sure if there is a single straight line anywhere. It leaped onto the screen directly from the pages of Dr. Seuss.

Seuss Architecture

This clip should give you a sense of the dreamlike sense and senselessness of the thing.

Read the remainder of this entry »

13 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Fewer Bishoppesses, please. More Crusaders.

Posted March 8, 2016 By John C Wright

 

Sweden’s first she-bishop wants to remove crosses because they might offend Mohammedans.

Article in German: http://de.sputniknews.com/panorama/20151007/304768617/schwedische-bischoefin-kreuze-kirchen-muslime.html

Church of Sweden, by the bye.

And the Reformers thought that national churches, controlled by the secular power of kings and parliaments, would prove wiser and more Christian, a better shepherd,  than an international, universal, ecumenical one.

Saint James Matamoros, pray for us.

 

49 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Unimpressed and Undecided

Posted March 6, 2016 By John C Wright

I was so remarkably disenchanted by Mr. Trump’s performance in the last debate, that at the risk of seeming inconstant, I truly begin to wonder if his negatives do not outweigh is positives.

I would gladly pull the lever for either Mr. Trump or Mr. Cruz, but would hope to maintain concord with any fellow Republican who prefers the other one.

The deal is, I hold my nose and vote for your candidate if he wins the nomination if, in return, you agree to do the same for mine. We both agree to abide by the outcome of the nomination process. Deal?

There are some who renounce the deal. They will never vote for Trump, no matter what. They will never vote for Cruz no matter what.

Unwise. Because the “no matter what” still matters.

Come the general election, all who are not yearning with their whole hearts for the destruction of his nation at the hands either of the aging felon Mrs. Clinton or the aging Bolshevik Mr. Sanders, must rally around whichever candidate is nominated.

Better to vote for Cthulhu than for a democrat, because life in R’lyeh is better than life in the third world banana republic hellhole. That is where the nation is headed, and at full throttle. The economic and racial policies which made Detroit into one of the wonders of the world — from richest city on Earth to a garbage pile on one generation is truly a wonder, merely an appalling one — will do the same when applied to the rest of the nation.

I believe that in the areas which matter most to me, either Trump or Cruz will get done the basics they have promised, particularly if Republicans retain control of the House and Senate. Neither one can sign unconstitutional nonsense into law if the Congress does not pass it to him.

But Mr. Trump seems to lack certain basic bits of knowledge every candidate should possess. For example, his answer to a trick question about issuing unlawful orders to the military was foolish.

Him I do not blame for the crudeness, carnival barker and pro-wrestling atmosphere of this race. The Dems won election after election with such tactics and the majority of voters react positively rather than with disgust. That is the fault of the general crudeness of the American people, which in turn has it’s roots in the Youth Movement of the 60’s.

Ever since the Youth Movement in the 60’s we have lost dignity, tact, and charm each generation. And our ancestors were pioneer folk, none to refined to begin with. It is regrettable, even abominable, but I blame us, not him. Not wholly.

But crudeness is something from which the nation can recover, if we survive, repent, and vehemently abolish the only other rival religion to Christianity equal in strength to it, namely, political correctness.

Mr. Trump has greater charisma than Mr. Cruz, but no displayed loyalty to constitutional principles, and, seemingly, no loyalty to respect the constitutional bounds of the office.

The bluster and the undignified antics are unpresidential: he is a rightwing version of Barack Obama. Mr. Obama was, as it turns out, no more loyal to the Left than you or I would be.

I am disappointed and disheartened with him, but not to the point of supporting the vile betrayers RINOs and establishmentarians who seek to overturn the nomination process, and certainly not to the point of vowing not to support whatever candidate the party base picks.

But I hope they pick Cruz. He is a solid and principled conservative. He won a place in my heart when he filibustered for twenty four hours and more. And all the right people hate him.

I dismiss worry that one is more electable than the other.

Read the remainder of this entry »

82 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Father Elijah and Alpha Centauri

Posted February 29, 2016 By John C Wright

I told myself I was going to read DIALOG WITH TRYPHO for my Lenten reading, but I got derailed. It seems that the author of VOYAGE TO ALPHA CENTAURI (which I enjoyed despite its non-science-fictiony mood and flavor) has written a political thriller about the End Times called FATHER ELIJAH: AN APOCALYPSE.

This was not LEFT BEHIND, albeit it may share some themes and setting.

Michael O’Brian is the author, and since he is not a Science Fiction author, of course I’ve never heard of him. My reading tastes are shockingly narrow.

On the other hand, Michael O’Brian did a masterful job with VOYAGE of portraying character development and addressing spiritual concerns. The depiction of the soft tyranny of Political Correctness once it takes full control of a society is more chilling, at least to me, than George Orwell or Aldous Huxley dystopias, because it is indirect, voluntary, subtle, and disastrous.

Once scene in particular grips my memory with a fearful fascination, just in so how realistic it is: the secular humanists, finding evidence of a horrific dehumanizing culture once existing on the sole planet of Alpha Centauri, and puzzled that they seem to have been humans from our earth, decide to re-enact one of their ‘Nature Worship’ rituals as pieced together by archaeologists, a vibrant ritual of dancing and chants the secular humanists see as beneficial for encouraging group spirit, and adoring the natural world. It involves the worship of snakes, and doing a snake-dance, and a few more things … the main character realizes from examining the archeological records even further, that rebel god-being from the native mythology the rite adores is an enemy of man, depicted as being in revolt against a supreme being. The main character sees the celebrants dancing and writhing and copulating in their life-affirming psychologically expert-approved affirmation of their self-affirming nature-love and ecological earthday values …. and he sees the darkness behind it. The seculars are calling up powers that the natives (and the main character) believes to exist, but the seculars do not.

It was all very subtle, and, in that sense, quite realistic. VOYAGE did not have a dramatic plot, nor was the viewpoint character the driver of the action, nor able to solve either the main conflict of the story, nor the specific technical problem at the end. Indeed, his attempt to solve the problem with gunfire goes badly awry.

So it was not the kind of story I, with my plebeian tastes, would typically enjoy, but the depiction of spiritual dangers was utterly realistic and spot-on.

Especially poignant were scenes in flashback which depicted the main character’s youth. He lived in a poor community, but among neighbors with strong religious bonds to each other whose children would occasionally be taken away by nameless bureaucrats for reasons unnamed.

The contrast between the poor all celebrating Catholic holy days together, and the sterile addictive pleasures of the all-benevolent Political Correction state was chilling indeed, but, again, the thing was done very subtly, not in a preaching way, and not in a heavy handed way.

The characters were realistic: almost like Tolstoy characters for their three dimensional, quirks and realism. But a science fiction reader will not take away from VOYAGE TO ARCTURUS any of the sense of wonder or sober scientific speculation which is the main appeal of the genre. The same events told in the same way could have happened in a base camp of archaeologists in Egypt or Persia with no change to the main points of the plot.

Read the remainder of this entry »

42 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Musical Interlude, now with Space Pirates

Posted February 26, 2016 By John C Wright

Love song from Orbit to Earth:

This is Elizaveta – Space Pirate’s Love Song.

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Half a Loaf is Better than No Bread

Posted February 26, 2016 By John C Wright

Part of an ongoing conversation with  DemosthenesVW on the wisdom and practicality of backing Donald Trump:

Sir, you make several trenchant and thoughtful points in arguing that Mr. Trump is an unknown, may prove unreliable, and has proven either a foe of conservatism or a fair-weather friend in the past.

I will certainly consider them: unless Trump wins the nomination, in which case my preference for another and better candidate will matter as little as my preferences for other and better candidates than McCain, Dole, and Romney.

But there is a main and telling point I would like you to address, and it is a more personal point. It is a point of boiling-point anger in me.

Ever since I started voting Republican rather than Libertarian, I have been asked by so-called moderates and so-called practical men to vote for unsuitable candidates who did not support my principles I hold most dear on the grounds that our bad candidate was better than the Democrat worse candidate. I accepted those grounds as valid. I voted as asked for establishment chumps and we got Clinton and Obama.

Now, when the shoe is on the other foot, and instead of a crony-capitalist like McCain or a will-do-nothing-about-abortion like Dole, or a pro-socialized-medicine-guy like Romney, and it is the turn of the moderates to hold their nose and vote for the most electable candidate, suddenly now and only now principles matter?

Suddenly a lack of interest in the abortion question or a willingness to go to war without a declaration of war or a desire for protectionist antifreetrade policies which were enough for the moderates to ask me to cast my vote for George W Bush, are now and only now suddenly deal breakers that will make the moderates stay home or vote Third Party?

The hypocrisy of the moderates is galling. I can and would support Ted Cruz with great enthusiasm if he wins the nomination, because, while he is a weaker weapon against the greater target, as I said in my original post, he is the stronger weapon against the lesser target, and we would have, Thanks be to God, a principled conservative in the White House, the first since Reagan.

On the other hand, if Cruz does not win the nomination now, let him run again in four years, or eight. I like him and would vote for him.

75 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Federalist 10

Posted February 25, 2016 By John C Wright

Curiosity got the better of me, and I looked up Federalist 10. It is the column called The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued)

http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm

AMOUNG the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. The friend of popular governments never finds himself so much alarmed for their character and fate, as when he contemplates their propensity to this dangerous vice. He will not fail, therefore, to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it. The instability, injustice, and confusion introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished; as they continue to be the favorite and fruitful topics from which the adversaries to liberty derive their most specious declamations.

It is the article arguing that a federal form of government is a better protection against the danger of factions, that is, political parties, particularly parties pitting the poor against the rich.

In effect, it contains an argument in favor of inequality of wealth as a necessary part of human liberty.

It contains the essential argument against direct democracy without which no man can understand the reason for the elaborate nature of the checks and balances of the three branches of the federal government, and the wisdom of drawing each branch from different constituencies at different times.

It is, in other words, as clear and concise a statement as possible in favor of the proposition that liberty is better safeguarded from the dangers of faction and the passions of the multitude than either a monarchy or a pure democracy.

… a pure democracy, by which I mean a society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.

During the Progressive Era, when the schooling that hitherto had been private were taken over by the government as a huge and absurd public project, it must have been essential to those planners to prevent high school children from reading Federalist 10, because no one persuaded of the argument therein can join the Democrat party.

The Seventeenth Amendment could never have been passed in a nation whose citizens read and affirmed Federalist 10. It is a warning against Progressivism, Leftism, Populism, Factionalism, and the lure of charismatic leaders.

******

Well, I am sharply upbraided by Mr. Madison against the conclusion of a recent column of mine. I find these considerations argue strongly against support for Mr. Trump, who is a populist, and not a republican nor a Republican. The matter bears more thought.

75 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Nominate Me, not Trump!

Posted February 24, 2016 By John C Wright

A fan wrote and asked which of my works are candidates for nomination to the Hugo ballot.

Unlike the year prior, where Castalia House published my entire lifetime of short stories, essays and so on, this year my output has been roughly the same as other authors. Nominating me for six awards is, hence, impossible this year. I will try to be more productive in times to come.

  • Scepter of Nowhere (short story) Dark Discoveries: Issue 31, ed. James R. Beach, Spring 2015.
  • ARCHITECT OF AEONS (novel) Tor Books (April, 2015)
  • SOMEWHITHER (novel) Castalia House (July, 2015)
  • A Reluctant Hero of Mars (essay) Edgar Rice Burroughs: The Master of Pulp Storytelling, Ed. Charles A Madison (May, 2015)
7 Comments so far. Join the Conversation