Archive for December, 2009

An Awful Lot of Wasted Space

Posted December 31, 2009 By John C Wright

I wrote: “But someone who takes it as an article of faith that Earth cannot be unique because there is no God, and therefore life must be an accident — aha! — he will be shocked if the universe is empty. But his belief is an article of faith, not a conclusion of science, and not a conclusion backed by evidence.”

Robert J Wizard writes: “I’m not sure whether your last sentence was directed at me. Here is what I meant: Empirically ruling out other life in the universe is impossible due to distance, travel restrictions, and the sheer mass of the damned thing.”

My comment: nossirreesir, my comment was directed at Carl Sagan. In the unfaithful movie adaptation of his SF book CONTACT, Jodi Foster’s character learns from her astronomer father that if we are the only people in the universe “that’s an awful lot of empty space!” They chuckle and are confirmed in their faith.

But this is hardly a scientific bit of reasoning; it is an aesthetic bit of reasoning. The idea that we are alone seems ugly to Carl Sagan (and to me) but where he allows his character to conclude that ergo we are not alone, I am too skeptical to permit myself that conclusion. We have a saying here in Virginia: I am from Missouri. Show me.

I can just imagine an ancient Greek talking to a skeptical academician. “But there must be mermaids and drayds in the vast expanse of the ocean! If only land people existed, that is an awful lot of wasted space! There must be nymphs and satyrs in the endless reaches of the forest! If only human beings exist in the woods, that is an awful lot of wasted space! There must be Centaurs in Scythia, or the endless plains of Asia! If only human horsemen exist, that is an awful lot of wasted space! Surely the holy gods dance atop Olympus and Ida and Cithæron and Helicon! If there is nothing but rocks and snow on Mountaintops, what a waste of space! There must be Macrobes in Taprobane and Cynocephalics in the Antipodes and one-eyed Arimaspians in the Riphaean mountains! The globe of the world is unimaginably vast and infinitely old! If there are not intelligent beings aside from humans, that is an awful waste of space!”

Skeptic: “What makes you believe Nature is not willing to waste space?”

* * *

As a matter of fact, we have discovered no other intelligent civilizations aside from human ones here on the vast expanse of our vast globe, and not even on the globes nearby. Missions returned from the moon without any evidence of a single Moon Maid of Va-Nah; the Grand Lunar of the Selenites has not shown himself. Mars seems not to have tripodal war-machines taller than church steeples stalking across the ochre-covered dead sea bottoms of Barsoom. The ancient Greek skeptic would have been correct.

89 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Truth About Radical Christians

Posted December 30, 2009 By John C Wright

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxsCxtzJEdM
Some of the comments on YouTube concerning this spoof were from people who did not know it was a spoof, or who nodded and agreed that “USA does have a real problem with christian identity groups and superpatriot groups committing terrorism.”

The point of the jest here is that the Left cannot tell the difference between Christianity and radical Islam.

Sadly enough, many not on the Left also cannot tell the difference, and proudly and resolutely maintain that we cannot take any steps against radical Islam, legal or military, which would not also apply equally to Christians.
Read the remainder of this entry »

159 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

It Aint Never Going to Happen (Except in SF)

Posted December 29, 2009 By John C Wright

A reader writes: 

"And I think eventually we’ll learn to harness gravity, once we understand what the hell it actually is, and then this pesky Einstienein relativistic-light-barrier will fall soon after that."

My comment: 

Ain’t going to happen. Apples did not start falling up when Newton refined Aristotle’s physics, and time did not start running backward when Einstein refined Newton. No advance refutes the previous evidence–it only reinterprets it. Faster than light drive is as likely as a ride on the back of a fairy-magic unicorn.

"Assuming the aliens don’t arrive…"

Is there even the slenderest scintilla of evidence that homo sapiens is not utterly alone in the universe? I do not mean a semi-unsupported hypothesis based in turn on a totally-unsupported hypothesis about the origin of life from non-life, I mean evidence, something you can bring into a court of law? Read the remainder of this entry »

42 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Known Universe by American Museum of Natural History

Posted December 29, 2009 By John C Wright

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17jymDn0W6U
Here is a video to give you an idea of the expanse in time and space of the known universe. My theist friends will be as awed by this intimation of the size, power, and dignity of the creator of such lovely vastness as my atheists friends will be awed by the magnitude and intricacy of blind nature at work.

Each side will perhaps be astonished that the other does not realize how clearly such magnitude proves either that is must have been made by God or proves that it could not have been.

More importantly, my Cthulhu-worshiping friends will of course be as enraged as am I to see that Pluto, or Yuggoth-on-the-Rim has been cruelly insulted once more by the astronomers and scientists of the vicious Pluto-Haytah cult, who went immediately from making this video to spitting on the grave of Clyde Tombaugh, and marking his tombstone with uncouth graffiti.

On a more personal note, my loyal science fiction fan will be disappointed to hear that my current work-in-progress, which I meant to be large scale, only carries out the plot action to the range of one billion lightyears (farthest mapped galaxies) and I leave the quasars and farther objects unexploded–perhaps my imaginings are still too parochial.

Enjoy.

15 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Wright Household Christmas Letter for 2009

Posted December 28, 2009 By John C Wright

From the pen of my beautiful and talented wife:

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

 

“God setteth the solitary in families” (Psalm 68: 6)

 

 

This year has been a wonderful year for us, a year of dreams come true. Most of all, it has been a year of patience rewarded, where long periods of waiting have finally borne fruit.

 

But first, the general news:

 

2009 was a wonderful year for the Wright family. Read the remainder of this entry »

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

To my Christian friends, I hope your celebrations of the Nativity of Our Lord were uplifting, and serve to remind you that a better world awaits us all in glory beyond the reaches of time. To my secular friends, I hope you got a lot of loot for Xmas.

Speaking of loot, Santa brought me a copy of Jack Vance’s autobiography, which despite theovercrowded social schedule of the day (stockings upended at 8.00 AM, inlaws over for breakfast at 9.00, Mass at 10.00, friends visiting at 11.00, then driving to my relations at 12.00) I somehow managed to read the first 65 pages. 

I cannot speak for anyone else, but to hear Jack Vance speaking in his own voice about his own life, I found fascinating. His ironic and erudite manner of speaking is unchanged, and parallels suggest themselves between the locations of his various adventures and those of his imaginary characters. The book promises to be not so much about shop talk (which might interest SF readers) but just about his life in general, which I personally think is the correct proiritization.

We spent the day with the family yesterday, amid jollity and good cheer, and brother-in-law and I both resisted the temptation to debate our political differences of opinion, to the general relief and comfort of the rest of the family. I should mention in passing that I have an exceptionally beautiful sister, and she married an exceptionally handsome man, and in due course gave birth to three daughters equally exceptional — but I see with eyes biased toward my own. Remind me at some other time to tell you my theory that hidden in among the normal Homo Sapiens Sapiens who hold dominion over the planet Earth, there lives among us (as secretly as the immortals from Highlander) a second and related species, Homo Sapiens Pulcherrimus, commonly called The Beautiful People. My sister and her family are members. Read the remainder of this entry »

7 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Its the end of AD 2009 and you ask where is your Flying Car?

Posted December 24, 2009 By John C Wright

Now that the Third Millennium is underway, many of you are suffering from retrofuturian nostalgia, which consists of wondering what ever became of the flying car and the jetpack, foodpills and robot maidservants, not to mention the moonbase, all those Hugo Gernsbeck stories promised you?

Well, I say, to frell with that! You dare to whine about your missing jetpack? Where is my land ironclad? You might have been promised a flying car! I want to know where is my gnormously awesomtastic armored hypersupertank bolo mark x??

Keep your flying car! Where is my Land Battleship? Read the remainder of this entry »

31 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

NRO on Avatar

Posted December 24, 2009 By John C Wright

This review may change my mind about going to see the film: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NTBmNDU0YWUwZmM2MDNhZWUyNmVlZGZlMzZmYjE3ZmY=

What I didn’t expect was the sheer beauty of the film. It won me over. I think it was the forests of Pandora that first broke through my grumpy attitude — the graceful trees, plants with enormous fan-like leaves, curious twisted ferns that shyly retract when touched. Everything is glowing in lavender, blue, and aqua; it could have been painted by Maxfield Parrish.

The highly anticipated 3-D process is most successful, I think, with the “seeds of the sacred tree,” a cross between a butterfly, a spider, and a dandelion puff. When these seeds begin drifting down, they really do seem to leave the screen and float over the heads of the audience.

Yet more beautiful were the Floating Mountains. These enormous floating rocks, crowned with trees and trailing vines, are truly awe-inspiring; they are worthy, I thought, of J. R. R. Tolkien.

So, yes, you need to see this movie, and see it while it’s in theaters, full-screen and in 3-D. Yes, you can take the kids, but only if they can handle some violent moments. The most graphic, I thought, came when a Na’vi spoke his last words with a shattered tree limb through his chest. There’s no nudity (though the cat-like Na’vis’ costumes are quite scanty) and the single love scene is swift and discreet.

Avatar is a perplexing mix of glorious method and crummy material, and it left me wondering why, in the hands of one artist, a familiar tale can move us even more profoundly because of those earlier links, and we call it a “classic” — while in the hands of another artist it seems derivative and stale. Why, in the hands of one artist, can a work express childlike wonder, while another’s reveals childish immaturity? The characters pushed around in this story seem like something thought up by a twelve-year-old. This is most ludicrous in the climactic battle, when bad Col. Quaritch survives a series of death-dealing blows that are increasingly hard to believe; at one point, his shoulder is literally on fire. I pictured Cameron killing Quaritch off with great satisfaction each day, then coming back the next day saying, “But I can’t let him die yet!

Some artists remain in touch with the inspirations and enthusiasms of their twelve-year-old selves, and produce something fresh and moving. There’s no reason that this script had to be as flat as it is. But, oh, the beauty. James Cameron may have a tin ear for dialogue, but he indisputably has an artist’s eye. Go see it on the big screen, and let yourself be dazzled.

My comment: I dunno. I am so very tired of the leftwing and their smug anti-rational anti-religion, and I am tired of hearing it preached at me, since the hypocrites who propound it so obviously do not believe it themselves. But I do like Maxfield Parrish.

I have tried my whole life to suppress my elitist good taste, so that I would be able to enjoy loud, bit, dumb eye-candy movies like a philistine — where is my ability to turn off my brain and enjoy an actioner flick when I need it?!

There is also an economic consideration: taking a family of four (six if you count the grown ups) to the movie palace and buying tubs of popcorn and buckets of soda at move palace prices is not a Depression-era entertainment bargain.

Besides, isn’t Disney’s PRINCESS AND THE FROG in theaters now?

31 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Forgetting How to Make Action Films, addendum

Posted December 23, 2009 By John C Wright

A few days ago in this space I reviewed (read: "mocked") a number of movies I truly disliked. I railed on against the most recent version of A CHRISTMAS CAROL, done with 3D computer animation by Zemeckis.

I forgot to mention one among the score of reasons I disliked the movie: the obligatory sucker-punch in my face all Leftiod filmmakers feel it necessary to put into their films: This one as a slap against organized religion.

Scrooge and the Spirit are hovering above a bakery. With no relation whatever to the plot, or to what we are seeing, comes this:

Scrooge: Spirit, these poor people have no means to cook their food and yet you seek to close the only places in which they can warm their meager meals every 7th day.

Ghost of Christmas Present: Hear me scrooge. There are some upon this earth of yours who claim to know me and my brothers and do their deeds of ill will and selfishness in our name. These so called men of the cloth are as strange to me and my kin as if they never lived. Charge their doing to them, not us.
 

For the record, here’s what Dickens wrote:

"There are some upon this earth of ours,” returned the Spirit, “who lay claim to know us, and who do their deeds of passion, pride, ill-will, hatred, envy, bigotry, and selfishness in our name, who are as strange to us and all our kith and kin, as if they had never lived. Remember that, and charge their doings on themselves, not us:"

You see, Dickens echoes the scriptural warnings against false prophets and false teachers, and condemns hypocrisy in properly Christlike words. Zemeckis condemns not hypocrites, but men of the cloth, that is, all priests and pastors.

If you want to see a film that does not slap Christians, let me recommend GOING MY WAY, or BELLS OF SAINT MARY’S or even ITS A WONDERFUL LIFE.

23 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Chinese Paladin 3

Posted December 22, 2009 By John C Wright

Here is a link to the wuxu soap opera I found in China, fansubbed into English.

http://www.viikii.net/channels/goto/chinesepaladin3#

I hope it comes out in a real version in America at some point. It runs like a D&D game for most of its length, but there is an episode near the end where the Taoist monk starts to lose his faith, and a taunting demon grown from his own thoughts (like the Glebbeth haunting Sparrowhawk in Ursula K Leguin’s A WIZARD OF EARTRHSEA) shows him the futility of life and the endless suffering of the wheel of reincarnation. The demon grants shows him the hidden thoughts of men and their evil deeds– his only way to defy the demon is to preach compassion to the evildoers in the crowd, which causes a disturbance (because he also knows the secret thoughts and the evil deeds of the magistrate). He get thrown into jail, where he speaks to the imprisoned, who mock him, but agree to turn over a new leaf if he releases them. He uses his Taoist martial arts magic to break the lock. He waits in the cell meditating, and when confronted by the angered magistrate, asks to have all the punishments of all the freed prisoners heaped upon himself. 

This is just one episode of many, and I thought it a particularly touching one. There is another episode where they fight the Monkey King, who appears in the form of a giant ape and blasts them with fart-gas from his bowels. I never claimed this show was all high drama — there is plenty of low comedy in it as well.

14 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Did I Ever Tell You About The Christmas I Killed A Man?

Posted December 22, 2009 By John C Wright

Doings on other blogs:

Over at the Wonder Cabinet, James A. Owen tells about the time he killed a man at Christmas.

http://coppervale.livejournal.com/258662.html?nc=30

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Heaven and Nature

Posted December 22, 2009 By John C Wright

I read with interest this article by Ross Douthat: http://pewforum.org/news/rss.php?NewsID=19306

He writes:

It’s fitting that James Cameron’s “Avatar” arrived in theaters at Christmastime. Like the holiday season itself, the science fiction epic is a crass embodiment of capitalistic excess wrapped around a deeply felt religious message. It’s at once the blockbuster to end all blockbusters, and the Gospel According to James.
 
But not the Christian Gospel. Instead, “Avatar” is Cameron’s long apologia for pantheism — a faith that equates God with Nature, and calls humanity into religious communion with the natural world.
 

He goes on to say:

If this narrative arc sounds familiar, that’s because pantheism has been Hollywood’s religion of choice for a generation now. It’s the truth that Kevin Costner discovered when he went dancing with wolves. It’s the metaphysic woven through Disney cartoons like “The Lion King” and “Pocahontas.” And it’s the dogma of George Lucas’s Jedi, whose mystical Force “surrounds us, penetrates us, and binds the galaxy together.”
 

He concludes:

The question is whether Nature actually deserves a religious response. Traditional theism has to wrestle with the problem of evil: if God is good, why does he allow suffering and death? But Nature is suffering and death. Its harmonies require violence. Its “circle of life” is really a cycle of mortality. And the human societies that hew closest to the natural order aren’t the shining Edens of James Cameron’s fond imaginings. They’re places where existence tends to be nasty, brutish and short.

Religion exists, in part, precisely because humans aren’t at home amid these cruel rhythms. We stand half inside the natural world and half outside it. We’re beasts with self-consciousness, predators with ethics, mortal creatures who yearn for immortality.

This is an agonized position, and if there’s no escape upward — or no God to take on flesh and come among us, as the Christmas story has it — a deeply tragic one.

Pantheism offers a different sort of solution: a downward exit, an abandonment of our tragic self-consciousness, a re-merger with the natural world our ancestors half-escaped millennia ago.

But except as dust and ashes, Nature cannot take us back.
 

My comments:

I have three unrelated comments. First unrelated comment: it is difficult to separate the author’s intent from the needs of story telling. While I have not even the slightest particle of doubt that the film-maker here is playing out his liberal leftwing white giult-trip fantasy power-trip, I will point out that such fantasies elegently serve the needs of story telling, especially in that niche of genre writing known as Planetary Romances.

Read the remainder of this entry »

93 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Invidia

Posted December 21, 2009 By John C Wright

Health care so-called reform has passed in the Senate, voting along strictly partisan lines, the Dems halted a Republican filibuster. In an after-Midnight session, sometime in the dark hours of Monday morning, your government, O Americans, decided to increase taxes, to increase the health care premiums paid by independently insured parties, to increase the premiums paid by unions in their plans, to fund Abortions (prenatal infanticide) from your tax money, and to lower the salaries of Insurance company members, and to restrict the return on investment of citizens holding stock in Insurance companies, and to otherwise dictate what hitherto had been private matters determined peaceably between rational men by negotiation.

The bill creates 112 new bureaus and offices, and no actual health care will be provided to anyone until five or nine years have passed, albeit the taxes and other impositions go into effect immediately. There is apparently no "public option" which means the poor still will not get any more or better or different coverage.

The bill is upwards of 9 trillion dollars over a ten year period. This, during a depression.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, at paragraph 2243:

Armed resistance to oppression by political authority is not legitimate, unless all the following conditions are met: 1) there is certain, grave, and prolonged violation of fundamental rights; 2) all other means of redress have been exhausted; 3) such resistance will not provoke worse disorders; 4) there is well-founded hope of success; and 5) it is impossible reasonably to foresee any better solution.

Of these criterion, not all have been met. Read the remainder of this entry »

67 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Forgetting How to Make Action Films

Posted December 18, 2009 By John C Wright

A reader asks: "If you are looking for movies to discuss, how about the one due out this Friday, Avatar, what looks to be a classic science fiction vehicle?"

Discuss movies? You dare to ask me to discuss movies! Prepare yourself, then, for discussion! I will discuss and discuss til my discusser is sore!

But there is not much to say about AVATAR — it looks from the commercials to be like an update of FERN GULLY, DANCES WITH WOLVES, and POCAHONTAS except without the really goodlooking Disney princess in the lead, and no singing trees.

In other words, the same old Enviro-Marxist Kill-the-Rich, Hate-the-Whites crap. You are supposed to cheer when the marines die.

Read the remainder of this entry »

150 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Or so I read here: http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/actor_blames_catholic_church_for_lack_of_golden_compass_sequels/

– Actor Sam Elliot has blamed the Catholic Church for stopping sequels from being made to the Golden Compass movie based on the first book of Philip Pullman’s atheistic trilogy His Dark Materials. The film, starring Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig and Eva Green, grossed more than $380 million worldwide after its Christmas 2007 release, but took in only $85 million in the U.S. According to the Internet Movie Database, the film had a budget of $180 million.

The 65-year-old Elliot, who played a Texan “aeronaut” in the film, charged that a Catholic-led campaign against the movie stopped its sequels from being made.

“The Catholic Church happened to The Golden Compass, as far as I’m concerned,” Elliot remarked to the Evening Standard.

My comment: HURRAH! What a bait-and-switch load of horse phooney Mr. Pullman’s trilogy turned out to be. It started out so good and ended up so lame, halting and sickly.

The numbers recited in the first line tells you the real story, however: the film was pleasing to the elitist taste of our atheist-nihilist-gnostic-lefteroid masters, and displeasing to the healthier tastes of the common man, to whom mass entertainment, after all, is directed.

In a Capitalist society, for better or worse, the commoners and their lucre have the last veto over what kind of art gets made, and gets rewarded.

Read the remainder of this entry »

55 Comments so far. Join the Conversation