Archive for August, 2010

Blindsided by Blindsight

Posted August 31, 2010 By John C Wright

I reprint this article from two years ago in response to a question by a reader, who goes by the august yet duodecimal title of Wildrow12 (not his real name). I offered the opinion that BLINDSIGHT by Peter Watts was an excellent yet flawed book, and was asked in what way I found the work flawed.

My regret about this article is that it concentrates so heavily on the negative, that the real strengths and virtues of the book, it expert world building and effortless genius of story-telling, are mentioned only in passing. On rereading it, I conclude my article is simply unfair: the book is darkly brilliant, and I only complain the kvetch about the mistakes, without complimenting the brilliance as enthusiastically as it deserves. Read what follows with that reservation in mind.

**************************************************

This is only in part a book review; in part it is a meditation on some of the topics raised by the books involved.

By some odd coincidence, I read BLINDSIGHT by Peter Watts (available on the web here http://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm ) the same day I read THE CUBE AND THE CATHEDRAL by George Weigel. The contrast between the two books, and the world views represented, could not be more clear.

SPOILER WARNINGS !!!

I discuss the surprise ending of BLINDSIGHT below, so for pity’s sake, if you mean to read this book, do not read this review.

Read the remainder of this entry »

18 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Part of an ongoing conversation. The beginnings of it are here (http://www.scifiwright.com/2010/08/whats-wrong-with-the-world/ ) and here (http://www.scifiwright.com/2010/08/whats-wrong-with-whats-wrong-with-the-world/) And here (http://www.scifiwright.com/2010/08/whats-wrong-with-whats-wrong-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-48427 )

Flamingphonebook (not his real name) and I are discussing the sickness of modern philosophy by means of the conceit of a dialog between Diogenes and an Imaginary Modern Man:

Of the imaginary dialog with an imaginary modern man, I “understand” (comprehend) the thought-avoiding thought process of the illogical self-indulgent whim-worshiper well enough, but I do not “understand” (sympathize with) the endless litany of excuses and self-deceptions an illogical and half-broken mind of necessity embraces in its never-ending struggle to hide from reason and reality.

Likewise, I do not “understand” (sympathize) the Apocalyptic description of those who call upon the mountains to fall on them, rather than face of glory of heaven, albeit I do “understand” (comprehend) how it is possible for a man to be so addicted to falsehood that he would rather die in an avalanche than see what the terrifying looking glass of Reason might reveal.

Read the remainder of this entry »

58 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Ignoring the Debt You Owe Heinlein

Posted August 27, 2010 By John C Wright

Over at Tor.com and SfSignal, there is some internetual (note useful new word!) discussion of Robert A. Heinlein and his legacy.

The ingratitude that hangs like a cloud of phosgene gas over the discussions I find as ugly and appalling as I do incomprehensible.

One writer opines, for example, that Heinlein was both a pro-feminist and a sexist pig. Me, because I harbor no illusions about what feminism truly stands for, I see no irony in that. I note that Hugh Hefner, pornographer, also was a pro-feminist and a sexist pig — this is the jarring combination is inevitable as long as modesty, femininity, chastity and fidelity are seen by feminists as enemies of equality for women rather than allies. Heinlein and Hefner perhaps sincerely believed in liberating women from the shackles of monogamy, and surely sincerely wish to liberate them all the way into a harem.

The topic is interesting. Nonetheless, the tone of ingratitude and supercilious condescension falling from the raised eyebrows and sneering lips of the leftward-leaning half of the commentators deters me from delving further into their conversation.

Read the remainder of this entry »

57 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Wright’s Writing Corner — Show, Don’t Tell

Posted August 25, 2010 By John C Wright

This week’s Wright’s Writing Corner has some sage advice by David Marcoe —

Show, don’t tell. Yes, oldest advice in the world, but one so often forgotten it helps to list it first. Often, in stories called “dense” or “philosophical,” characters will begin speaking more than acting, stopping to chide, declare or preach, often for an extended periods. The writer has so much to *say* and the simplest way is to put it in the character’s mouths.

The first and simplest mistake is that these conversations don’t naturally arise from what’s happening in the story; they feel like an interruption in what’s going on.

Read the whole thing here.

I recommend what he has to say, and wish my characters would follow his guidance voluntarily, and stop making speeches.

Jeesh! I tried reasoning with my characters, and when that failed, had to resort to threats. “Phaethon, shut UP already about Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage already! You have Space Pirates from the Black Hole of Cygnus X-1 to fight! I already have the alternate ending written where the Silent Oecumene wins, and Atkins runs off with your girl, and your whole life turns out to be a hallucination caused by a library malfuncation! You wanna ave the day and smooch the girl when the credits roll, then do your darned job and stop yacking!” — but by this point, he had tuned his sense filter to exclude me. Moral: never write characters bold enough to ignore their creators.

11 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Favorite Science Fiction Settings

Posted August 25, 2010 By John C Wright

The fine fellows over at SfSignal were kind enough to solicit my opinion about my favorite SFF settings. In my typical orotund fashion, I analyzed the several possible meaning of the question and defined the role of setting in “counterfactual fiction” (my newly-coined term for SFF) before saying I liked Tolkien’s Middle Earth and Zelazny’s Amber and especially liked the Tschai, Planet of Adventure, of Jack Vance.

http://www.sfsignal.com/archives/2010/08/mind-meld-favorite-sf-and-f-settings/

Read the remainder of this entry »

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

On a Slightly Lighter Note

Posted August 24, 2010 By John C Wright

I plugged in the verbiage from my short story, ‘One Bright Star to Guide Them’ which appeared in The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction in the April-May edition of the magazine (I plugged in the first chapter of my current novel, COUNT TO A TRILLION, but it came out that my writing style matched that of Vladimir Nabokov, a writer not to my taste, so I decided to see whether a second sample would produce a more flattering result.)

I write like
William Shakespeare

I Write Like by Mémoires, Mac journal software. Analyze your writing!

Read the remainder of this entry »

16 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

What’s Wrong with ‘What’s Wrong with the World’?

Posted August 24, 2010 By John C Wright

A reader with name of Flaming Phonebook asks a few burning questions, and called forward an imaginary Modern to give witness to the reasoning behind the Modern mind, discussed at (g’normous) length in my manifesto here.

I have read your essay from start to finish.

Let a respectful cap be doffed! You have heroic patience.

I praise you for its ease of understanding and for its completeness.

Thank you for your kindness, but the essay was neither as clear nor rigorous as it should have been.

Several times points occurred to me, which you then elucidated yourself. I am left only to further explore the base motivations of the Modern, in which I think I agree with you but may understand the psychology better, and the conclusion, in which I am sure I do not agree with you. For the former, and for the sake of my clarity, I now assume the persona of the Modern:

As an intellectual exercise, allow me to assume the persona of the Ancient. Unfortunately, the kind and sage ancient like Socrates is beyond my powers to impersonate, so I will play the sarcastic and condescending Diogenes.

Read the remainder of this entry »

18 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Doctor Who Theme as covered by ArcAttack on Tesla Coils

Posted August 19, 2010 By John C Wright

SF music played on Tesla Coils. It is to awe. (Hat tip to Sf Signal)

ArcAttack plays Dr Who

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Wright’s Writing Corner–Dickens’ Trick

Posted August 18, 2010 By John C Wright

Wright’s Writing Corner this week is a clue on writing technique from Charles Dickens.

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/132499.html

“There is not just a kettle on the fire, it is boiling over.” “Horses at the cab stands are steaming in the cold and stamping. When people enter a room they are sneezing or hiding something in their pockets.”

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Prospero in Hell and Prospero in Paperback

Posted August 18, 2010 By John C Wright

Announcing two more books from the Wright household in the bookstores!

Prospero In Hell

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0765319306/thewrighthouse

Prospero Lost paperback:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0765358832/thewrighthouse

WHAT CAN YOU DO TO HELP SALES?!?!

Fly now to your nearest outlet, buy every book in stock, find the name and home address of the story manager, and appear on his doorstep at 4.00 in the morning, drunk and raving that these are the best books you have ever read.

When you are thrown in prison, convince the inmates to buy and read the books and to vote for the Hugo Award for them.

Form a extensive  gang from fellow fans in prison, so that, upon release or breakout, the Lamplighter gang/fanclub can undertake paramilitary training for months and years, and next stage a coup d’etat of a small but wealthy Middle Eastern nation or Caribbean Island.

Then have yourself elected President-for-Life, and command by law every subject in your tiny yet wealthy nation to buy a copy. Destabilize the region in order to attract world attention. Announce the country’s atom bombs are hidden in locations hinted at by obscure clues on pages in the books, and that you will appoint your successor and heir whoever first figures out the mystery in chapter twelve, and phones you at the Presidential mansion.  History will thank you.

4 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Unrealistic? Or Just Bad Writing?

Posted August 16, 2010 By John C Wright

Squid314 complains about unrealistic telly, starting with Dr. Who. Then he goes after the most egregious example.

http://squid314.livejournal.com/275614.html

But then there are some shows that go completely beyond the pale of enjoyability, until they become nothing more than overwritten collections of tropes impossible to watch without groaning.

I think the worst offender here is the History Channel and all their programs on the so-called “World War II”.

Let’s start with the bad guys. Battalions of stormtroopers dressed in all black, check. Secret police, check. Determination to brutally kill everyone who doesn’t look like them, check. Leader with a tiny villain mustache and a tendency to go into apopleptic rage when he doesn’t get his way, check. All this from a country that was ordinary, believable, and dare I say it sometimes even sympathetic in previous seasons.

I wouldn’t even mind the lack of originality if they weren’t so heavy-handed about it. Apparently we’re supposed to believe that in the middle of the war the Germans attacked their allies the Russians, starting an unwinnable conflict on two fronts, just to show how sneaky and untrustworthy they could be? And that they diverted all their resources to use in making ever bigger and scarier death camps, even in the middle of a huge war? Real people just aren’t that evil. And that’s not even counting the part where as soon as the plot requires it, they instantly forget about all the racism nonsense and become best buddies with the definitely non-Aryan Japanese.

[…]

The actual strategy of the war is barely any better. Just to give one example, in the Battle of the Bulge, a vastly larger force of Germans surround a small Allied battalion and demand they surrender or be killed. The Allied general sends back a single-word reply: “Nuts!”. The Germans attack, and, miraculously, the tiny Allied force holds them off long enough for reinforcements to arrive and turn the tide of battle. Whoever wrote this episode obviously had never been within a thousand miles of an actual military.

Probably the worst part was the ending. The British/German story arc gets boring, so they tie it up quickly, have the villain kill himself (on Walpurgisnacht of all days, not exactly subtle) and then totally switch gears to a battle between the Americans and the Japanese in the Pacific. Pretty much the same dichotomy – the Japanese kill, torture, perform medical experiments on prisoners, and frickin’ play football with the heads of murdered children, and the Americans are led by a kindly old man in a wheelchair.

Anyway, they spend the whole season building up how the Japanese home islands are a fortress, and the Japanese will never surrender, and there’s no way to take the Japanese home islands because they’re invincible…and then they realize they totally can’t have the Americans take the Japanese home islands so they have no way to wrap up the season.

So they invent a completely implausible superweapon that they’ve never mentioned until now

[…]

…and then, in the entire rest of the show, over five or six different big wars, they never use the superweapon again. Seriously.[…] At this point, you’re starting to wonder if any of the show’s writers have even watched the episodes the other writers made.

I’m not even going to get into the whole subplot about breaking a secret code (cleverly named “Enigma”, because the writers couldn’t spend more than two seconds thinking up a name for an enigmatic code), the giant superintelligent computer called Colossus (despite this being years before the transistor was even invented), the Soviet strongman whose name means “Man of Steel” in Russian (seriously, between calling the strongman “Man of Steel” and the Frenchman “de Gaulle”, whoever came up with the names for this thing ought to be shot).

A short but note-perfect article. Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction is required to live up to our expectations. Hat tip to Back of the Envelope.

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Nonhumans in human literature

Posted August 13, 2010 By John C Wright

This question from a reader has so many ramifications, that I thought it merited its own post. And even this lengthy post cannot but begin to delve the surface of  a deep mine.

“Question: do most sentient beings in other worlds constructed dawn a human like nature? You said in Dark City they have that very other worldly quality. How hard is it to truly (at least attempt) to construe a non-human intelligence/nature?”

Answer: It is as hard as the writer (and his readers) wants it to be, depending on how much imaginative effort the writer (and his readers) is willing to shoulder.

Keep in mind the point of stories is to entertain readers, most of which are human. A space alien in such a story is either a prop or a character.

Read the remainder of this entry »

16 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Pundits puzzle over why it should be that fantasy, that nostalgic adoration of swords and sorcerers, elfin mariners whose silver ships breast the winedark starlit seas of myth, and science fiction, that futuristic admiration of lightsabers and Lensmen, space marines whose silver starships soar the starry vacuum of space, attract much the same audience.

At first glance, one would think the two genres opposites. Upon second glance, they seem to be two suburbs of the came city of imagination, so much so that a special names, speculative fiction or SFF, has been concocted to express the mixed group. They are seated next to each other in the bookstore, and certain magazines, most notably the Magazine Of Fantasy And Science Fiction, caters to both.

Science Fiction readers and fantasy reader overlap to a degree greater than those of, for example, fantasy readers and readers of historical novels, whom one would suppose would be a natural overlap. One would suppose it natural after finishing reading Robert Pressman’s GATES OF FIRE or Mary Renault’s THE KING MUST DIE or Sharon Kay Penman’s SUNNE IN SPLENDOR to turn to Robert E. Howard’s tales of Conan the Cimmerian, or to Tolkien’s THE RETURN OF THE KING or to the Lyonesse Trilogy of Jack Vance; but in truth the readers of the deeds of Hyborians, Hobbits or inhabitants of Hybrasil are more likely to have just finished reading about the Slans or Silkie of A.E. van Vogt rather than Centurions or Saxon of Alfred Duggan.  But why?

Much ink has been spilled defining science fiction or defending definitions, but one element is at the center of all the disputes. Everything other form of genre work, from detective novels to westerns, take place in what is recognizably this world. Sciencefictioneers build new worlds.

Whatever takes place in a world whose rules and expectations are an invention of the author, and ergo should be explained by the author to the reader, is speculative fiction.

Read the remainder of this entry »

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Prayer Request — They Arrested my Son’s Teacher

Posted August 10, 2010 By John C Wright

UPDATE (Oct 25, 2011 over a year after this post): Your prayers were answered. The case was dismissed with prejudice. It seems the prosecution did not share with the defense exculpating evidence until the last moment.

————————————————————————————————

Yes, the police literally led her away in handcuffs.

Had she done anything wrong? I very much doubt it.From what I know of her, she is an exemplary teacher, skilled and patient.

Here is my wife’s words on the matter:

Something has happened that is so upsetting, I can hardly write about it without crying.

As a mom with several kids in special ed programs–and with many friends with similar issues, I’ve seen and heard about a lot of teachers. Some teachers are not so good with autistic kids. Some are alright.  Only a few are really good.

Possibly the best teacher I’ve ever seen is Jennah Billeter, who was Ro’s kindergarten and first grade teacher. Miss B showed such love and concern for her students, such care and patience! Nothing phased her.  I watched her have her hair pulled over and over again and never lose her cool. Instead, she gently led the child responsible to overcome that behavior. What she got those children to be able to do was downright amazing.

Last spring, Miss B did something that one of her teacher aid’s thought was cruel to her students. Instead of confronting her or talking to the school principal, this teacher aid reported Miss B to Child Protection Services. The result was: last week, Miss B was arrested!

Miss B now faces both misdemeanor  and felony charges. I cannot imagine what a nightmare this must seem like to her. For any of you who pray, please pray that God will be with her during this trial and will support her, no matter what happens.

Thank you.

Read the remainder of this entry »

30 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Many folk have asked me,”Pardon me, sir, but could you leave the store? You are frightening our customers.” While this is a good question, a better question is, “Dear world famous yet humble science fiction author John C. Wright, why is it that your taste in movies is so very bad? Didn’t you actually like LADY IN THE WATER by M. Night Shyamalan? What criteria do you, world famous science fiction author John C. Wright, use to achieve such an astonishing nadir of goodtastemanship?”

Let us address the second question:

I judge science fiction movies by a sequence of carefully chosen criteria: (1) first, is there a hot babe in a skintight and/or revealing future-suit at any point in the film? (2) Is there a gorilla? (3) Is there a robot? (4) Does any character have Way Cool mind powers? And, most importantly, (5) Does a planet get blown up? I then award stars according to how many of these five criteria are met, giving me a ranking from zero to five. Add an extra star if there is a Space Princess.

Let’s see how our favorite science fiction films line up against these wise and reasonable and completely non-arbitrary criteria, shall we?

Read the remainder of this entry »

76 Comments so far. Join the Conversation