Archive for July, 2013

Cover Art for THE CONCUBINE VECTOR ??

Posted July 31, 2013 By John C Wright

The Tor Art Department has not yet decided on a cover for my next book, CONCUBINE VECTOR, which, to be frank, I have not finished or sent to them yet. But I was able to find an artist’s conception of a possible cover online. See below the cut.

Read the remainder of this entry »

21 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Cover Art and Synopsis of JUDGE OF AGES

Posted July 30, 2013 By John C Wright

Here is the cover to JUDGE OF AGES.

Read the remainder of this entry »

47 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Panphysicalism

Posted July 27, 2013 By John C Wright

Part of an ongoing, possibly endless, conversation. My apologies to those whose patience with this is not superhuman.

A reader of the philosophical materialist persuasion named Andreassen offers me the following axiom, which I call the panphysicalist axiom:

All atomic motions without exception, including those in the bodies of free-willed beings, are exactly described by the laws of physics.

I asked him, if this axiom is true, how he knows it to be true? Explained the question in the following terms:

Specifically I was attempting to discover from you whether the axiom (1) applies to this and every logically conceivable version of the cosmos (2) happens to apply to this cosmos but conceivably might not (3) applies only to local conditions within the cosmos, such as at or near the earth’s surface.

His answer:

Your second option is true: Materialism is a conditional universal.

My reply is below

Read the remainder of this entry »

424 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

On the Garden of Paradise

Posted July 26, 2013 By John C Wright

This is an essay I was asked to write for a Spanish language anthology, not yet released, asked of several men of letters their thoughts and opinions about the life to come. I reprint it here with the editor’s permission.

The garden of paradise lies beyond the fields we know, where we slumber and labor, and we father sons and see them fall in war, where we have toothache and heartache and mighty loves and tiny wasps to engage our attention, and to console us is the Church like a mother who takes a crying child in her arms. This is called the valley of tears not because life here is nothing but tears, but because life there is nothing like tears.

Little can be known of these gardens and less can be said, for words are curving yardsticks and crooked walking sticks indeed. But what little can be said must be said, for to that gate of pearl we all must go, whether we will or not, and all who fear eternal death yearn for eternal life, which is not found on this side of the gate. But how can we know what no man has seen, sight which mortal eyes, by their nature, might be too dim to see, and mortal minds too dark?

Perhaps we can know the unknown by what little clues the unknown has made known to us.

Once, two twins in the womb were discussing conditions outside, for they no doubt had heard a rumor or report that they were soon to be disembarked or, rather, decanted into that strange outward realm so much unlike their present condition. One twin thought the world outside the womb might be two or three times as large, but otherwise would be much the same as this, a dark and comfortably narrow space, filled with warmth and fluid, and nutriments sucked in through the belly button. The other, more daring, mentioned the voice he sometimes heard through the living walls of their world, the voice of the mother who comprised the whole world, and he dared to dream that one day, after birth, he would see the mother face to face. He wondered if he might hear her more clearly there, and perhaps find the owner of the beating heart beneath which they slept.

The first was doubtful, pointing out that if they departed from the world of the womb, the umbilicus which fed them might drop away, and belly button would become useless, and they would starve. The second one sucked on his thumb a while in thought, and answered that perhaps there was some other organ, some method of taking in nutrient, which the babes in the womb world had not yet imagined.

Now if the unborn were truly wise, they might examine their eyes, and wonder if the world outside held light, for otherwise these organs have no use. They might inspect their hands and feet, and grasp that in the world outside there would be things to grasp, and surfaces on which to walk. But they could not imagine, even in their most daring leaps of fantasy, that in the months after mother’s milk there would be fruit and food and even feasts, and that their hands would not only grasp things as various as the strings of the lyre or the trigger of a gun, and that their feet would wade through clear pools or flowery grasses, or carry them dancing with their beloved in their arms, arms which would one day in turn carry babies like themselves.

Read the remainder of this entry »

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Daily Dose of Chesterton

Posted July 26, 2013 By John C Wright

A word of explanation. This was written after GK Chesterton was no longer an agnostic, and had lost a good deal of sympathy with the Liberal Party to which he belonged. but long before he joined the Catholic Church. I reprint it here as it has some bearing on some recent articles in this space, and it shed light on the a recurring source of mutual incomprehension I have discovered between Protestants and Catholics which seems the most persistent and most baffling to both sides.

The quote below is from the biography by Maisie Ward:

The Education Bill of 1902, brought in by the Conservatives and giving financial support to Church schools, saw Gilbert in general agreement with the Liberal attacks. He did not yet appreciate the Catholic idea that education must be of one piece and he did not think it fair that the country should support specifically Catholic schools. Parents could give at home the religious instruction they wanted their children to have. But with that fairness of mind which made it so hard for him to be a party man he saw why the Liberal compromise of simple Bible teaching for all in the State schools could not be expected to satisfy Catholics. He wrote to the Daily News:

 The Bible compromise is certainly in favour of the Protestant view  of the Bible. The thing, properly stated, is as plain as the nose on  your face. Protestant Christianity believes that there is a Divine  record in a book; that everyone ought to have free access to that  book; that everyone who gets hold of it can save his soul by it,  whether he finds it in a library or picks it of a dustcart. Catholic  Christianity believes that there is a Divine army or league upon  earth called the Church; that all men should be induced to join it;  that any man who joins it can save his soul by it without ever  opening any of the old books of the Church at all. The Bible is only  one of the institutions of Catholicism, like its rites or its  priesthood; it thinks the Bible only efficient when taken as part of  the Church. . . . This being so, a child could see that if you have  the Bible taught alone, anyhow, by anybody, you do definitely decide  in favour of the first view of the Bible and against the second.

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Several judgment calls, which of necessity are personal rather than objective, influenced my decision to join the Catholic Church.

Third was my judgment that the sacraments are a useful, if not crucial, part of Christian life.  Protestants regard the clerical sacraments as barriers to faith rather than bridges. Here we come to a deep and horrible lie, and it is the oldest lie recorded in history or scripture.

Consider the tale of the Garden of Eden. Whether one thinks it literally true or not, clearly it is figuratively true, perhaps the best and clearest figure of man’s rebellious place in the world that anyone could ever draw.

For what is the woman asked by the serpent? The question was what God really forbade, or why He forbade it. If God forbid the parents of mankind from partaking of divine wisdom because He wished them not to be gods like Himself, then God is not the highest good, but instead (so the satanic reasoning goes) the highest good consists of rebellion against God, to take by unlawful means the joy His lovelessness forbids you.

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

Heroic Villains and Villainous Heroes

Posted July 23, 2013 By John C Wright

I recently saw two films and a cartoon, and was puzzled, perhaps even a trifle aghast, and could not puzzle out what it was I was seeing. Then I heard one speech, and the puzzle was solved.

The two films were MAN OF STEEL and DESPICABLE ME 2, and the cartoon was BEWARE THE BATMAN. This is not a review of any of these, but the reader is warned that the surprise ending of at least two are revealed below. By way of review, I will say only that each was worth the ticket price, each was well done and well written.

The one speech was by the author of KINDER GARDEN OF EDEN, Evan Sayet. By way of review, I will admit I have not read the book, only heard the author’s description of its main idea, and this idea resolved the puzzle that so bewildered me about the three shows I saw.

Let me describe the puzzle first. I spoil the ending of MAN OF STEEL in the next paragraph, so I urgently beseech any reader who has not seen the film to read no further.

Read the remainder of this entry »

148 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Universal Apology — Summation

Posted July 22, 2013 By John C Wright

SUMMATION and CONCLUSION

In the preceding articles, I give my reasons for coming to believe the Catholic Church is what she claims to be, the one and true Church, apostolic and universal, founded by Christ and containing all sacred truth.

Readers of a modern frame of mind, as is only natural for those raised in English-speaking hence Protestant cultures, will no doubt be nonplussed that the majority of this argument dwelt on the question of who has the authority to define Christian teaching.

(Readers of a post-modern frame of mind, or non-mind, will have a negative emotional reaction to the word ‘authority’ because it has been associated by their indoctrination with the concept of tyranny and despotism, and they will make squawking noises like a duck in reaction, just as they have been conditioned or programmed to do by their programmers. We need not dwell on the delicate distinction between legitimate versus illegitimate authority, because it is neither necessary nor possible to answer an sentimental reflex with a reasoned argument: all that happens is the post-modern mind will dimly apprehend other words in the argument to which it has a stereotyped and pre-programmed reaction of sentimentality, and again will produce duck-noises, regularly as a dog salivating to Pavlov’s bell. I address no argument to anyone in this frame of mind.)

From even before I was a Christian, I have never sympathized with the argument that one can accept the writings of the Church as authoritative, but reject the authority of the Church that authorized them.

Read the remainder of this entry »

30 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A PERSONAL NOTE on SHOOTING ONESELF IN THE FOOT

By rights, I should explain what might be called my procedural decisions. I did not, for example, demand a sign from the Lord as to which denomination is correct.

My very strong intuition and inspiration, amounting to a personal dogma, is that the Lord of Light is more concerned for whether a man is helping the poor, visiting the prisoner, aiding the widow, feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and baptizing the lost, that He is concerned about our opinions about mysteries the human mind is not constructed to be able, in this life, to understand. I am convinced that the Lord regards discussions of the differences between denominations with hatred. I expected no sign.

Nonetheless, thanks to the followers of Christ who ignored and betrayed Christ’s last prayer spoken on Earth, which was for radical unity between His followers, I nonetheless had to choose between the denominations. Staying at home on Sunday and inventing my own personal brand of Christianity, known perhaps as Wrightinanity, was not an option, and departing the house required I either take the road to the left or to the right, since the church buildings of the different denominations lay in different directions. Which way to go?

Not without prayer, I set about to reason my way through the conflicting accounts of history and theology. I knew that I had no formal training in theology, nor any but a smattering of Greek and Latin and nothing of Aramaic or Hebrew, so I knew that revisiting each and every case of every opinion called heretical was beyond my powers. Even to read two or three books on the history of heresies was nearly beyond my powers, or at least my patience. I knew I had no ability to come to an independent yet sound conclusion about the nature of the Filioque controversy, nor to comb through such records as the obliterating gluttony of history had spared of the debates of the councils and synods grappling with that issue.

I decided at once not to heed any argument about non-essentials, that is, arguments which, even if proved true, would not change the verdict on the merits. For example, suppose that the Council of Trent is wrong about the doctrine of the Real Presence, or wrong about the doctrine of justification by faith alone rather than faith and works? Would I in either case refuse to take the Eucharist or refuse to have faith or refuse to do good works? Would anything in my behavior be changed, or anything in my prospects of salvation be changed?

The answer was no.

Read the remainder of this entry »

28 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Universal Apology Point Fifteen: ON SACRAMENT

Posted July 20, 2013 By John C Wright

ON SACRAMENT

Now I come to a final point, but this is not one which convinced me to join the Catholic Church, for at this point in my search, I had become convinced at first intellectually, and then with my whole soul, that the Catholic Church was what she claimed to be: the one, true, holy, apostolic and universal Church founded by Christ, adorned as His bride, and also forming His mystical body on Earth. This final point is one I discovered only after I entered communion with the Catholics, and which I could have only discovered then.

The final point is the centrality of the sacramental life to the Christian life, and the luminous, supernal reality of the sacraments as a conduit for divine grace.

In a Catholic Church, you do not only praise Christ with your lips, you eat him with your mouth in an act of intimacy shocking alike to the Muslims as to the Gnostic, who regard all matter as evil, and God too good to be incarnate. The shock of incarnation is still alive here, and still offending people.

Read the remainder of this entry »

15 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Universal Apology Point Fourteen: SLANDERS AND RUMORS

Posted July 19, 2013 By John C Wright

SLANDERS AND RUMORS

The fourteenth point which convinced me of the truth of the Catholic faith was the untruth of the accusations made against that faith. I found out very quickly that nearly any Catholic whom I read or whom I heard knew precisely what various Protestants taught and preached, and that no Protestant I read or heard knew what the Catholics taught and preached, but instead uttered the most outrageous propaganda against the Church.

This awoke my suspicions. I had seen a similar thing in debates between Communists and Economists (I will not here use the word ‘capitalist’ to refer to any man who prefers sound economic principles to bloodthirsty tyranny). The Economists knew the errors of the Communists by chapter and verse, whereas the Communists had no idea whatever of what Economics taught or supported.

No one shoots blanks who has real ammunition. The only reason to resort to misrepresentation as a tactic in debate is when the truth will not serve.

Read the remainder of this entry »

41 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Universal Apology Point Thirteen: ON LEGALISM

Posted July 18, 2013 By John C Wright

ON THE NATURE OF LAW

I am recounting the several reasons I have for accepting that the Catholic Church is what she says she is. The thirteenth point which convinced me was the particular character of the Catholic Church. She is preeminently balanced and just in her approach, a type of justice often dismissed as being legalistic or pharisaic. That dismissal is groundless. A balanced and just approach is the only approach: anything else is emotionalism, perhaps fanaticism.

I will repeat here what I have said many times: The Catholic Church is eminently logical. If Vulcans had a religion, they would be Catholic.

Read the remainder of this entry »

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

News from Nowhere

Posted July 17, 2013 By John C Wright

I was just reading a review of Alan Garner’s classic WEIRDSTONE OF BRISINGAMEN, a novel I strongly recommend to anyone who has not had the pleasure of reading it.

I was not too taken aback to see that the reviewer, an adolescent I presume, thought the book similar to LORD OF THE RINGS. Apparently the child had not been exposed to enough fairy tales to see the Cadellin and Gandalf and Merlin the Magician are all from the same archetype.

Another archetype is Durathor the Dwarf, who dressed and acts like a doomed, grand warrior from a Norse saga, eager for Valhalla.

Read the remainder of this entry »

20 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A SHORT HISTORY OF HERESY

Let us take a short while (or, if need be, a long one) to review some of the heresies of the first ten centuries of the Church. I am confident that even an abbreviated list will make clear the particular nature of heresy:

Read the remainder of this entry »

ON THE CHARACTER of HERESY

In religion, just as in politics or philosophy or any other institutional mental effort, heresy is taking one idea from an organic plurality of ideas and elevating it to supreme preeminence, so that other ideas are justified by their agreement with the master idea, or rejected by the master idea. What makes heresies illogical — all heresies, not just religious ones — is that the master idea has no innate preeminence over other ideas in the institutional mental effort equally as old or foundational or well-attested.

Read the remainder of this entry »

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation