Let me recommend Mike Flynn’s journal to you:
http://tofspot.blogspot.com/2013/10/found-upon-web-and-reprinted-here.html
I came across this interview with David Berlinski and in interviewer who, back when I was a newspaper editor, if I saw this degree of unprofessional opinionated argument with an interviewee, I would have fired him.
.. Why do you think the debate about Darwin’s theory of evolution has taken on such a nasty turn?
David Berlinski: Nasty, eh? If so, the nastiness is not entirely ecumenical. As far as I can tell, only one side is now occupying the gutter, even though the gutter is, as gutters generally are, more than spacious enough for two. But you raise a good question. Why are Darwinian biologists so outraged? Like the San Andreas fault, the indignation conspicuous at blogs such as The Panda’s Thumb or Talk Reason is now visible from outer space.
- "the first step in attacking someone’s argument is always to make them the butt of a joke," That you stated…
- DB: There is no argument against religion that is not also an argument against mathematics. Mathematicians are capable of grasping…
- objects still followed Newton’s second law before Newton was even born. Well, technically, we do not really know this... but…