Archive for April, 2014

The Realm of Faerie

Posted April 30, 2014 By John C Wright

A very bright and very earnest young man asked me as a personal favor to write an article explaining J.R.R. Tolkien’s famous essay ‘On Fairy Stories’. It is a task I am honored to attempt, but inadequate.

The essay is seminal for understanding the role modern fantasy should fill but which it so often does not. It is also one of many examples of the general rule that Christians see things in their entirety, which the pagan worldview can only partially see, and to which atheists are blind.

Professor Tolkien in his opening tells us precisely what questions he means to answer in the essay: What are fairy-stories, what is their origin, what is their use? This last point is the true meat of the matter. Tolkien’s theory is that the use of fairy stories falls is Recovery, Escape, Consolation.

But he starts with a word of warning that the subject matter is itself elfin:

The realm of fairy-story is wide and deep and high and filled with many things: all manner of beasts and birds are found there; shoreless seas and stars uncounted; beauty that is an enchantment, and an ever-present peril; both joy and sorrow as sharp as swords. In that realm a man may, perhaps, count himself fortunate to have wandered, but its very richness and strangeness tie the tongue of a traveller who would report them. And while he is there it is dangerous for him to ask too many questions, lest the gates should be shut and the keys be lost.

Read the remainder of this entry »

40 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

We’ve Made the Washington Post Notice

Posted April 30, 2014 By John C Wright

The article is here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/04/29/the-politics-of-science-fiction/

* * *

Ironically, in the comments section, the lying Left (but I repeat myself) continues to misquote Vox Day calling a woman savaging him a half-savage as ‘racist.’ Contra, see here: http://voxday.blogspot.com/2014/04/am-i-racist.html

Read the remainder of this entry »

122 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Open Reply to Mr. Wright

Posted April 30, 2014 By John C Wright

From the Pen of Fail Burton, concerning my recent departure from an organization no longer properly calling itself SFWA (the Science Fiction Writers of America), rather than SFWA (the Socialist Fantasy-believing Witchhunters of Agitprop):

I don’t really see how you or Mr. Torgersen had any choice. Though you may not be being targeted as individuals, you are certainly on an informal blacklist because of being white, male, and heterosexual, and therefore responsible for anything any other white, male, and heterosexual has ever done throughout all time and space. When this is turned on its Orwellian head the PC call this “Islamophobia” and “homophobia,” though there is no proof of such a movement within SFF.

Read the remainder of this entry »

18 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Reviewer Praise for AWAKE IN THE NIGHT LAND

Posted April 30, 2014 By John C Wright

Mr. Bruce Charlton has some kind comments about AWAKE IN THE NIGHT LAND.

I have thus far read the first section – some 50-70 pages?) of John C Wright’s new book Awake in the Night Land – and I can see and say that here is an original and unique and very high quality prose artist – quite aside from any other virtues or deficiencies he may have as a writer of fiction.

What strikes me is the flexibility, the long phrasing, the assured naturalness (as conveyed by euphony or lack of jarring elements) – it reminds me most of when I first encountered Saul Bellow thirty-something years ago; when I was entranced by his prose-writing.

(I have come to dislike, indeed be revolted by, Bellow’s world view and the pretentiousness of his content; but remain intoxicated by the actual quality of the prose.)

Wright’s prose stands-out by its fluency.

Read the whole thing:
http://charltonteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-prose-artistry-of-john-c-wright.html

 

Be the first to comment

My Wife’s Would-Be Resignation from SFWA

Posted April 29, 2014 By John C Wright

Here is a link to Mrs. Wright, known to the world under the pen name (and her maiden name) L. Jagi Lamplighter. While she was not formally a member, she was the one who paid for us and took advantage of the membership benefits, read the Bulletin, and so on.

You or I perhaps could not resign from a guild of which we are not a member, but the amazing Mrs. Wright can do unlikely feats

I do not get to withdraw formally from SFWA because they did not realize I was a member…but I ran John’s membership for years (except for the voting. He did that.) And we both agreed to leave before John withdrew.

I am not like John, who doesn’t pay attention to worldly things and whose only regret about dropping out of SFWA will be that he can no longer write funny stories about visiting the secret SFWA mansion in Pennsylvania.

I loved SFWA.

I adored it. I dreamed of joining for years. I carefully waited and planned, striving to earn the right to be a member.

For over thirty years.

I admired those who were members and cherished my bulletin which I read religiously. (Mainly Laura Resnick, back when she wrote for it, and, after her, the due of her father and the other gentleman he wrote with. Their articles were the best part.)

The only reason I was not a member was that John joined first. For me to join would have been double the money for the same services. They have a joint membership now, I believe. I had been planning to ask to join this summer when his membership came due.

But now…I am abandoning that dream.

Here, simply, are my reasons

http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/2014/04/29/my-would-be-resignation-from-sfwa/

5 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Cosmic Chessboard, or, ONCE MORE FOR OLD TIMES SAKE!

Posted April 29, 2014 By John C Wright

A reader or two unwisely commented that my endless debate by Dr. Andreassen on radical materialism was worthwhile, perhaps as a case study on the pathology of a man like me who keeps arguing long after it is clear his opponent has left the room, but he continues to prance and mince about the stage, making grand orator’s gestures and barking rhetorical questions at an empty chair.

For the sake of those one or two unwisely flattering readers, I would like to offer one more argument along the same lines as the infinite number already spoken. Since this is not addressed to Dr. Andreassen, I will not try to simplify the argument to slow and childlike steps, but merely speak as if I were addressing someone learned in this discipline.

Let us start with two assumptions: first, all existing things whatsoever are made of matter.

Second, this or any other meaningful statement made about an existing thing is either true or false.

If a statement represents what it intends to represent, (namely, that if what a statement says is so indeed is so) that is what we call true; and if not, the statement is false. For the purposes of this argument, we need not bother with graduated variations of degrees of accuracy.

To this was must add a third assumption: that when a statement is true, a certain correspondence obtains between the statement in the brain, and the object the statement represents.

Hence, there is no possible condition or arrangement of the cosmos (including the parts of the cosmos where we human brains store statements both true and false about the cosmos) can be represented by a given number.

Read the remainder of this entry »

159 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The Notorious Meat Robot Letters!

Posted April 29, 2014 By John C Wright

Being a group of philosophical dialogues on the topic of determinism and freewill, which, in a kindlier universe, could have been decided in a paragraph.

I post this here as a curiosity to show that even otherwise rational fellows like myself, can be lured into an obsessive behavior, answering the same few questions over and over against to an interlocutor with no interest whatsoever, and no ability to feign interest, in the topic being discussed.

Let this be a warning against the immoderate love of anything, even an immoderate love of philosophy, leads to squandering time better spent elsewhere. Whether these dialogs are utterly useless, or might inspire edifying thoughts in some readers on the topic, is for heads wiser than mine to decide.

It is also a warning to my fellow philosophers: when involved in a dialog with a woefully ignorant yet absurdly arrogant layman on a philosophical topic, you must discover whether he has the honesty, willingness or aptitude to think about philosophy, before you decide whether to continue. A willingness can make up for a lack of aptitude. With such men endless patience is rewarded. But nothing can make up for a lack of willingness.

Read the remainder of this entry »

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Quote of the Day

Posted April 28, 2014 By John C Wright

From the pen of Brad R. Torgersen:

…but the little boy who cries wolf, and is himself a wolf in sheep’s clothing, doesn’t earn my respect or my ear…

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

To whom it may concern,

It is with no regret whatsoever that I rescind and renounce my membership in SFWA. I wish nothing more to do with the organization and no more contact with it.

The cause which impels the separation is clear enough: over a period long enough to confirm that this is no mere passing phase, the SFWA leadership and a significant moiety of its membership has departed from the mission of the organization, and, indeed, betrayed it.

The mission of SFWA was to act as a professional organization, to enhance the prestige of writers in our genre, to deter fraud, and to give mutual aid and support to our professional dreams.

It was out of loyalty to this mission that I so eagerly joined SFWA immediately upon my first professional sales, and the reason why I was so proud to associate with the luminaries and bold trailblazers in a genre I thought we all loved.

When SFWA first departed from that mission, I continued for a time to hope the change was not permanent. Recent events have made it clear that there is not reasonable basis for that hope.

Instead of enhancing the prestige of the genre, the leadership seems bent on holding us up to the jeers of all fair-minded men by behaving as gossips, whiners, and petty totalitarians, and by supporting a political agenda irrelevant to science fiction.

Instead of men who treat each other with professionalism and respect, I find a mob of perpetually outraged gray-haired juveniles.

Instead of receiving aid to my writing career, I find organized attempts to harass my readers and hurt my sales figures.

Instead of finding an organization for the mutual support of Science Fiction writers, I find an organization for the support of Political Correctness.

Instead of friends, I find ideologues bent on jihad against all who do not meekly conform to their Orwellian and hellish philosophy.

Politics trumps Science Fiction in the modern SFWA.

I am willing and eager to work alongside anyone sharing an enthusiasm for fantasy and science fiction, and to put aside as irrelevant all discussion and inquisition and condemnation of personal opinions on matters religious, political, and social, which are no part of that business.

We are not a political party, or so I thought.

Too many members and leaders in SWFA are not willing to reciprocate. They are not even willing, out of common courtesy or common decency, to withhold their pens from libel and their tongues from slander.

To the devil with them.

To the rest, those honest writers in SWFA who remain members out of inertia or false hopes of reform, it is with sorrow and respect I say my farewell and take my leave,

John C. Wright.

POSTSCRIPT and ADDENDUM: Several people, both publicly and privately, have asked me for the details of my claims, to name the events and persons involved.

I politely but firmly decline to do so since some of the names are those I have worked with in the past and might work with in the future, men whose work I read with pleasure and admiration, and I seek no public shame to visit them.

Such is the courtesy which, at one time, one professional expected from another. I find it sad that I am required to explain it.

And it would be ironic indeed if I failed to display the professionalism whose lack forms my main complaint.

As for the public examples of similar unprofessional antics, these are clear enough to anyone paying attention; those who are not paying attention have no reason to pay attention to this letter.

 

317 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Pale Realms of Shade

Posted April 24, 2014 By John C Wright

Pale Realms of Shade

by

John C Wright

 So live, that when thy summons comes to join
The innumerable caravan that moves
To the pale realms of shade, where each shall take
His chamber in the silent halls of death,
Thou go not, like the quarry-slave at night,
Scourged to his dungeon, but sustained and soothed
By an unfaltering trust, approach thy grave
Like one that wraps the drapery of his couch
About him, and lies down to pleasant dreams.

Thanatopsis, William Cullen Bryant (1821)

 

1

It was not the being dead that I minded, it was the hours.

No one ever calls me up during the day, and most people decide to wait until after midnight, for some reason.  I am a morning person, or was, so meetings in the still, dark hours lost between midnight and the dawn make me crabby.

This time, it was not some comfortable séance room or picturesque graveyard with moss-covered stone angels. I came to the surface of mortal time on a street corner of some American city, mid-Twentieth to early Twenty-First Century. You can tell from the height of the buildings that it is American, and from the fact that the road names are written on signs rather than walls. And Twenty-Second Century streets are not lit up at night, of course.

The main road was called Saint Street. The small alley was called Peter Way. Great. I was crossed by Saint and Peter.

I smelled her perfume before I saw her. I turned. There she was, outlined against the streetlamp beyond. I could not mistake her silhouette: slender, alluring, like a she-panther as she walked.

“Matthias,” she breathed in her low whisper. Her voice was throbbing music to me, despite everything that had happened. “You look well — ah — considering.”

“Lorelei,” I grunted. She was just wearing a blouse and skirt and a knee-length gray coat, but on her the outfit could have made the cover of a fashion magazine. Or a girly magazine. Her wild mass of gold-red hair was like a waterfall of bright fire tumbling past her shoulders to the small of her back. Atop, like a cherry on strawberry ice-cream, was perched brimless cap. My arms ached with the desire to take her and hold her. But I could never touch her, or, for that matter, anyone ever again.

She sighed and rolled her enormous emerald-green eyes. “Sweetheart, this time, you have to tell me if you were murdered. You have to!”

I took a puff of an imaginary cigarette, and watched the smoke, equally imaginary, drift off in a plume more solid than I was. “I ain’t saying.”

“But you must! I cannot rest until I know!”

Now I knew when and where I was. Because I died the day the Korean War ended. July 27. Mark the day on the calendar. That was the day I gave up smoking. This was only a a few months after, judging from the dry leaves scuttling across the sidewalk, the bare branches of the one tree, surrounded by concrete, across the street. Late October or early November.

“My heart stopped,” I said. “I died of natural causes.”

She pointed a slender finger at the holes in my trench coat. “You’re dripping!”

I looked down. The rest of my body was black and white like an old talkie, a thing of sable mist and silvery moonlight. Only the blood was red, bright as Lorelei’s lipstick.

It was not something I was deliberately imagining myself to look like. I guess it was part of my self-image, subconscious or something. That seemed unfair. I had had a tricky subconscious my whole life. It was one of the things I had thought I had gotten rid of, left behind.

“That’s natural,” I said. “When bullets pass through the lung cavity, they naturally make a large holes. One of them went through my heart, and caused it to stop, like I said.”

Read the remainder of this entry »

73 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Wright’s Writing Corner: Heroines and Monsters

Posted April 23, 2014 By John C Wright

Today’s guest blog is an excerpt from an academic paper by a YA author
who, amazingly, quotes–of all people–me. ;-)

Are Kick-Ass Heroines Always Also Monsters?

by Margo Bond Collins

One of the things that I’ve always loved about the use of the term “kick-ass” is that it indicates approval of heroines’ tendency to move from more traditionally feminine roles into behaviors more usually associated with the male heroes of action movies and literature; these women carry weapons and aren’t afraid to use them.

But the shift of heroines’ roles in urban fantasy from passive recipient of romantic love to active participants in violence and killing also carries a certain amount of anxiety in our culture. L. Jagi Lamplighter (my fabulous host today!) notes that “today’s audiences have welcomed this golden age of butt-kicking heroines with great relish,” but also claims that these heroines face a “fundamental conflict between modern culture and drama”:

read more:
http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/2014/04/23/wrights-writing-corner-guest-post-author-margo-bond-collin

32 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Ma-ha-ha-ha-ha!

Posted April 23, 2014 By Mrs. Wright

I have shanghaied this blog. You will have to read this post quickly, before the Master of the Blog returns and purges my post.

I did not feel John’s comments on the Sneerers covered the matter sufficiently. In particular:

-It is a classic bit of special pleading with extra sentiment and tearjerking self pity to boot. Since I’ve read some of Wright’s other blog posts I can assure you that if someone were to frighten him out of his new found religion and back into his old supposed logical atheism he wouldn’t become a worse person. He never altered his basic attitude towards other human beings which is contempt for them–especially for women who aren’t feminine by his standards. He simply transferred his contempt from believers to atheists. He remains, as he always was, an authoritarian personality in search of a group to oppress, and a stronger group to cling to for protection. C’est tout.

The problem with this is it suggests John became Christian and then turned on atheists. But it actually happened in the opposite order. He became disgusted with the illogic of his fellow atheists and, thus, became more friendly to Christians.

At the time, I thought this was foolish. After all…we Christians know that there are many strange and outlandish folks among the Christians whose arguments make no sense. But later, I realized that one of the reasons John was an atheist is that he thought atheists were reasonable and religious folk were not.

But even now, years later, John still is troubled when he hears bad atheist arguments. He begins twitching with the desire to go set things right and mutters under his breath, “They are a disgrace to the Powers of Evil!”

He will then turn to me and say, “I could put that across so much more clearly!”

To which I say….”True…but you aren’t supposed to be helping the Powers of Evil.”

To which he says, slightly deflated, “Oh…right.”

The biggest lesson I take from all this, however, is to be careful when I judge others. I can see how a person reading John’s work could easily draw the conclusions drawn above…but they would be totally wrong about the kind of guy he is and his motivations. Makes me think I should be slower to judge others based on their public statements.

Okay…back to our regularly-scheduled blogger!

Cheers,

Mrs. John C. Wright

 

 

 

40 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

From David Bentley Hart, my hero:

Simply said, we have reached a moment in Western history when, despite all appearances, no meaningful public debate over belief and unbelief is possible. Not only do convinced secularists no longer understand what the issue is; they are incapable of even suspecting that they do not understand, or of caring whether they do. The logical and imaginative grammars of belief, which still informed the thinking of earlier generations of atheists and skeptics, are no longer there. In their place, there is now—where questions of the divine, the supernatural, or the religious are concerned—only a kind of habitual intellectual listlessness.

You may read the article in context here: http://www.firstthings.com/article/2014/05/gods-and-gopniks

And, come to think of it, if you have the free time to read my humble journal, you have the time to read FIRST THINGS, which is somewhat higher than I on the Great Scale of Eternal Being.

Read the remainder of this entry »

22 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

On the Way!

Posted April 23, 2014 By John C Wright

I wrote a short story in honor of Easter I hoped to share with my readers. But my schedule has been a little hectic, and I had to take the kids to see CAPTAIN AMERICA — well worth the ticket price, may  I add.

I hope to get the story up this week. It was based on an opening of the story I wrote for a workshop. We each had an hour to write a one hundred word opening paragraph. I wrote a thousand, and I read mine last because I was the pro in the room. I did not know what to do with the opening until now.

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Banned

Posted April 22, 2014 By John C Wright

Just a note for those of you who do not take me seriously.

Someone whose name I will not bother to repeat had the effrontery to write this question to me:

(quoting me) I am as patient as Job, and so entertain any comment that does not devolve either into swearwords or Holocaust denial.

Mr. Wright, would you have any respect at all for a Protestant blogger who refused to countenance “Spanish Inquisition denial”, let alone, say, a Buddhist blogger adopting the same stance in a show of solidarity with Protestants?

My father in law was a Jew in Germany during the war. He saw the camps. He wounded his hands tearing down the fence of one when it was liberated. He was awarded a Purple Heart.

I am not required by any possible interpretation of the rules of courtesy and goodsportsmanship in debate to listen to lying-ass would-be National Socialist vermin racist filth call my dead father-in-law a liar. Such a creature is an enemy to whom no quarter nor parley need be granted.

Let no one dare to send any message to me on this topic again.

pile-of-shoes_dachauIf the picture is too small to be clear, it is the shoes of the victims gathered at Dachau by the efficiency of the Germans. Count the number and divide by two.

 

25 Comments so far. Join the Conversation