The Three Laws of Robotic are among Isaac Asimov’s most famous conceits. He wrote a number of clever if vapid stories where these three laws formed the gimmick.
The Three Laws of Robotics, quoted from the Handbook of Robotics, 56th Edition, 2058 AD, read as follows:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Now, as a vehicle for writing a set of lighthearted, frivolous mystery stories where a robot seems to be malfunctioning or violating these laws, but, by some ironic cleverness, turns out not to be, the conceit of these three laws is beyond reproach.
Asimov’s robot yarns are among the most famous in the genre, are entertaining, and all are cobbled together in a workmanlike fashion, if sparse and laconic, lacking any characters, settings, or world-building worthy of mention.
So, if taken as the robot stories were meant to be taken, as deeply shallow, no criticism of their central conceit is fair. As well object to time travel or faster than light drive.
However, if looked at even for a moment by a sober, adult, morally serious viewpoint (by which is meant, a Catholic viewpoint) the shallowness of the robot stories is painfully obvious, as is the intellectual pride.
For, as it turns out, intellectual pride, specifically the pride of Faust, was the egg from which the conceit of the robot stories hatched. Let none pretend to be surprised.
Read the remainder of this entry »