John C. Wright's Journal

Here follows a reprint of a column from 2014, which I thought pertinent to the tumults preoccupying current headlines.

I here add only the comment that the remarks below pertain only to those foolishly but honestly deceived by the slogans of the masters. The elite masters of the murderous ideology regard their followers as useful idiots, much as the Morlock of A.D. 802,701 regards the hapless Eloi.

In the short time since this essay was last reprinted here, the naked wickedness of the elite of the Left, with their abundance of allies on the RINO Right, has grown more clear, and mental no-man’s-land where honest self-deception can still flourish grown narrower. 

Universal Field Theory of Leftism

Do not be deceived: Leftism is an enigma. We need a theorem that explains not one or two aspects of Leftism, but all their traits.

The theory must explain, first, the honest decency of the modern liberals combined with their astonishing indifference, nay, hostility to facts, common sense, and evidence; second, it must explain their high self-esteem (or, to be blunt, their pathological narcissism) combined not merely with an utter lack of accomplishment, but with their utter devotion to destructiveness, a yearning to ruin everything they touch; third, it must explain their sanctimoniousness combined with their applause, praise, support, and tireless efforts to spread all perversions (especially sexual), moral decay, vulgarity, and every form of desecration; fourth, their pretense of intellectual superiority combined with their notorious mental fecklessness; fifth, it must explain both their violence and their pacifism; sixth, the theory must explain why they hate the very things they should love most; seventh, the theory must explain why they are incapable of comprehending an honest disagreement or any honorable foe.

And, while we are at it, if we could also explain why the Rich, who are routinely vilified by the Left number among its most ardent supporters, or the secular Jews, our theory would be very potent in its explanatory power.

There is such an explanation. I make no claim to have discovered this theory. It was discovered by Alan Bloom, back in the 1980’s, in his book THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND, which he wrote to explain why the generation of the 1970’s was suddenly and remarkably stupider than any previous decade of his students.

The theory was popularized recently by Evan Sayet in his book KINDER GARDEN OF EDEN. Roots of this theory go back further yet: you will find an early articulation by C.S. Lewis in his seminal THE ABOLITION OF MAN, written a generation prior. And no doubt he learned his ideas from G.K. Chesterton in his ORTHODOXY, who wrote a generation prior again, and first diagnosed the error involved in Freethinkers (as they were called then) doubting one’s own ability to think.

Let us examine each one in order.

Read the remainder of this entry »

An unsightly matter must be discussed, and has before, and shall be again. My pen will not grow weary of truths told ten thousand times, and I pray the reader will not.

The Left reasons that since they promote egalitarianism, any opposition to their policies can only be prompted by racism, which they see as opposite and mutually exclusive.

Because Conservatism opposes egalitarianism, they are routinely and ubiquitously accused of racism by the Left.

It is a sad irony that real racists, overhearing this clamor, often come to the conclusion that Conservatives are natural allies.

When Conservatives reject their offers of alliance with horror and disgust, the racists, bewildered and hurt, conclude that the Conservatives act against their own best interests, either due to folly or cowardice, or other character flaw.

The reason for the rejection of the alliance is based on the strength of conservative principles, not the weakness of conservative character.
Read the remainder of this entry »

My opinion, in this case, is better expressed by another:

Read the remainder of this entry »

A mistrial occurs when 1) a jury is unable to reach a verdict and there must be a new trial with a new jury; 2) there is a serious procedural error or misconduct that would result in an unfair trial, and the judge adjourns the case without a decision on the merits and awards a new trial. See, e.g. Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594 (1994).

In this case, serious error included a failure to sequester jury, leaving the jurors open to influence and intimidation, including, apparently, mob agitation by a sitting federal Congresswoman.

Noteworthy is that jury deliberation covered three days of evidence in a day, without asking the judge for instructions. Unlikely that any adequate deliberation took place is such a hasty time frame.
Read the remainder of this entry »

I have always grown pouty and grumpy like an old man, even when I was young, hearing the idea that more information and more detailed information, about the future, or about anything, somehow detracts or diminishes from the freedom of the will.

Bosh and rubbish, say I.

Read the remainder of this entry »