Archive for June, 2006

Athens and Jerusalem (Continued)

Posted June 30, 2006 By John C Wright

Xander25 comments on ancient roots of equality, of justice being ‘no respecter of persons’:

It seems to me there is a similar line of thought in Epictetus: “XLIV. These reasons do not cohere: I am richer than you, therefore I am better than you; I am more eloquent than you, therefore I am better than you. On the contrary these rather cohere, I am richer than you, therefore my possessions are greater than yours: I am more eloquent than you, therefore my speech is superior to yours. But you are neither possession nor speech.”

My comment:

That passage in Epictetus (my favorite philosopher, by the bye) nicely shows what I meant in the original posting: the West is a combination of threads of thought issuing from Athens and Jerusalem.
more here

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Gudgeons and ginger-cakes, pull!

Posted June 27, 2006 By John C Wright

Just in case you wished you were, right now, right this minute, instead of staring at a computer screen, in a whaleboat in the far seas, amid the salt and spray and dazzling sun, pulling an oar for a school of whales, as an able seaman under the command of Captain Ahab (who perhaps you do not yet realize is mad, though he did make you swear that odd oath in Chapter 36, not twelve chapters past) in the boat of Stubbs, the mate:

“Pull, pull, my fine hearts-alive; pull, my children; pull, my little ones,” drawlingly and soothingly sighed Stubb to his crew, some of whom still showed signs of uneasiness. “Why don’t you break your backbones, my boys? […]Pull, then, do pull; never mind the brimstone devils are good fellows enough. So, so; there you are now; that’s the stroke for a thousand pounds; that’s the stroke to sweep the stakes! Hurrah for the gold cup of sperm oil, my heroes! Three cheers, men- all hearts alive! Easy, easy; don’t be in a hurry- don’t be in a hurry. Why don’t you snap your oars, you rascals? Bite something, you dogs! So, so, so, then:- softly, softly! That’s it- that’s it! long and strong. Give way there, give way! The devil fetch ye, ye ragamuffin rapscallions; ye are all asleep. Stop snoring, ye sleepers, and pull. Pull, will ye? pull, can’t ye? pull, won’t ye? Why in the name of gudgeons and ginger-cakes don’t ye pull?- pull and break something! pull, and start your eyes out! Here,” whipping out the sharp knife from his girdle; “every mother’s son of ye draw his knife, and pull with the blade between his teeth. That’s it- that’s it. Now ye do something; that looks like it, my steel-bits. Start her- start her, my silverspoons! Start her, marling-spikes!”

On the other hand, in case you wished you were Herman Melville right now, keep in mind that this huge whale of the book, Moby Dick, ruined his career as a novelist, and sent him back to his day job, to die in drunken obscurity and misery many years later. Moby Dick never sold through its advance. How like a loyal crewman on a doomed ship, seeking to capture something greater than words can capture, only to have it turn on you and sink you!

Still, immortality is something, is it not? How often have writers started awake on moonless midnights, sobbing, their floating hair in disarray, wishing they had written a line like: “Why in the name of gudgeons and ginger-cakes don’t ye pull?” or even “Call me Ishmael.” ?

Is it the better part of wisdom to pray the Muse to smite you with her white-hot harpoon, that you might be drawn, O poet, up out of the ocean of banality, and render up some ambrosial words mere mortals cannot digest? Or the better part to pray she passes you by, the glancing-eyed goddess, so that you might cobble up some workmanlike product that will make your next sale? There is a certain romance to paying your bills, after all.

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

They’re taking the hobbits to Isengard!

Posted June 22, 2006 By John C Wright

Everything you needed to know about prosedy in parody
http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/the_prosody_of_itaking_the_hobbits_i/

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Respect of persons is a sin

Posted June 22, 2006 By John C Wright

Lubu asks: Could you elaborate on “first, the insistence that all men are equal springs from the Jewish tradition that God is no respecter of persons, and that salvation is individual”
It was my understanding that this sentiment was atributed John Locke who conceptualized rights as natural and inalienable. Locke is considered to be a empiricist who developed his ideas based on experience. On the surface, I do not see the connection between the Jewish tradition and John Locke.

My answer: First, the concept that all men are created equal is not an empirical idea because it cannot be. The legal and moral status of a person is not something that can be seen with your eye, measured with a yardstick or stopwatch. Second, re-read Locke. He will tell you exactly where he got his ideas from.

If you want to investigate the matter, look at the laws in the Old Testament, and compare them to other primitive law codes, such as the Code of Hammurabi, or the early Saxon law. There is one point which will immediately strike a lawyer as significant: other primitive codes require that the law first establish the status of the person before determining which law applies, or how severe the penalty was.

For example, the Saxon weregild code reads like a butcher’s menu: this much money is what it costs if you have damaged the leg of a freedman, that much if it is the leg of a slave, so much other if it is a noble; and the different body parts had different costs, as well as a blood-price for murder, and so on. (This code was an attempt to ameliorate the bloodthirstiness of the endless Germanic blood-feuds, by having the parties settle for a cash payment instead). The rank of the parties involved was the prime consideration.

There is nothing like that in the Jewish code. The suspicion of Jewish tradition toward authority has deep roots. Read the book of Samuel, where the prophet warns the peoples what their desire for a King will do to them. For that matter, notice how Jewish history dwells on the faults of their leaders and kings. The Egyptians and the Chinese were more self-congatulatory.

But the main carrier of the idea of egalitarianism in the West is Christian theology. Here is Thomas Aquinas on the issue:

http://www.newadvent.org/summa/306301.htm

“any circumstance that does not amount to a reason why this man be worthy of this gift, is to be referred to his person: for instance if a man promote someone to a prelacy or a professorship, because he is rich or because he is a relative of his, it is respect of persons. It may happen, however, that a circumstance of person makes a man worthy as regards one thing, but not as regards another: thus consanguinity makes a man worthy to be appointed heir to an estate, but not to be chosen for a position of ecclesiastical authority: wherefore consideration of the same circumstance of person will amount to respect of persons in one matter and not in another. It follows, accordingly, that respect of persons is opposed to distributive justice in that it fails to observe due proportion. Now nothing but sin is opposed to virtue: and therefore respect of persons is a sin.”

From this idea, that all men are equal in the eyes of the law, to the idea that all men are equal in suffrage, is a very small step.

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Never

Posted June 22, 2006 By John C Wright

Someone asked me to estimate how long it would be until we developed a hyperdrive.

I am bold enough to say: Never. We will never break the speed of light. Never.

Why so confident? Because when Einstein proposed his theory, he did not abolish Newton. Apples did not start falling up. more here

Be the first to comment

What is Western Civilization

Posted June 20, 2006 By John C Wright

Over at the Belmont Club, http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2006/06/liberal-internationalism.html
they were discussing Liberal Internationalism.
One poster there linked to an article on the psychopathology of liberalism, describing it as a suicidal envy-avoidence behavior.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/1/20/231252.shtml

(Myself I am chary of attributing a psychopathology to a behavior that can more charitably be ascribed to charity. Liberals have Christian faith without Christianity: they think the last should be first, and so they root for the underdog; they think Divine Providence will protect them, and so they turn the other cheek and do not hate their enemies.)

One question in the resulting comments was, “What is Western Civilization?”

Specifically, “What specifically about the West is so disdained and what is it about the left that produces this apparent self-loathing? “Western Civilization” is a really big idea, one which includes Marxism and multi-culturalism itself.”

My answer: Western civilization is Christendom.


It is the civilization that grew out of the fall of the Roman Empire, and inherited its verities. The two major threads that run threw the various European nations include the heritage of Athens and the heritage of Jerusalem. The Athenian heritage includes the rational, the scientific, the enlightened, but also the skeptical, questioning, unsettling intellect which is the source both of Western strength and Western shame. The Jerusalem heritage includes an unique respect for human life, individualism, an insistence on monogamy, but also includes a dark passion for religious conformity that overleaps tribal and national boundaries. Both threads contain a love of liberty and a belief that history unfolds towards an end goal.

The contrast with the great ancient civilizations of the East, with India and China, or with the terrifying civilizations of South America, Aztec and Toltec, could not be more pronounced. The world-view of the Hindu, the Buddhist, and the Taoist are profoundly passive, seeking salvation neither through works nor faith, but through detachment and mysticism; and the Western mind grows faint contemplating the endless cycles of Buddhist eternities, where eon follows eon, changelessly. There is no native word for liberty in these parts of the globe; polygamy is the norm; infanticide is as common as among the ancient Romans.

The God of Christendom is the subject of speculation and deduction in an Athenian fashion: theology is a science in the West, and from this grows our political traditions, the belief that men, through the use of his god-given reason, can produce a government rationally based to protect our god-given rights. It is commonplace today to depict religion as the enemy of science and freedom, but this is not historically sound. The contrast between the Empire before and after the rise of Christianity makes plain that the status of women and underlings was markedly improved by the canon law, and this consistently across the centuries. Christianity, and nothing else, abolished the slave trade, first in Europe in the fifth and sixth centuries, and then across the globe. In places where Western Civilization, i.e. Christendom, is weak, the vile trade is making a reappearance.

The civilizations of the Near East are our dark reflection. The Muslims share with us the Jerusalem thread, but not the Athenian. They have a Christian belief in a universal and egalitarian religion, to be spread to all peoples, but they have rejected skeptical inquiry into the truths of the universe as impious. There is no Muslim St. Thomas Aquinas which ties ancient pagan culture into modern faith. They have no universal Church, and hence no intellectual superstructure.

Marxism and multiculturalism spring from the skeptical tradition of Athens. The first is merely Plato’s REPUBLIC updated with various fallacies of economics. The very terms used to criticize capitalism are all taken from the Enlightenment tradition: charity for the poor, and insistence that the law be no respecter of persons, fraternity, equality, and so on. Marxism is Western skepticism without the ballast of Western theology, and, like Islam, becomes a destructive, bloody force in history.

Multiculturalism is promoted by people who have no interest or love of foreign cultures: it is Western skepticism pointed against Western exceptionalism, an insistence that history be no respecter of persons, and that all men are created equal. Naturally, no sultan in whose veins the blood of the Prophet runs, no Son of Heaven, no Brahmin born into his high caste, has this generous Western respect for the barbarians and infidels beyond the boundaries of his civilization.

Like all modern Western intellectual innovations, multiculturalism is merely an inferior and disproportionate copy of an idea first promoted, and placed in proper proportion, by Christian theology: first, the insistence that all men are equal springs from the Jewish tradition that God is no respecter of persons, and that salvation is individual; second, the insistence on universality springs from the Roman tradition that truth is catholic and ecumenical, that is, world-wide and universal, not the special possession of one race or nation.

Naturally, it is heresy in their eyes to remind Western intellectuals where they get their ideas.

That is what the Leftist intellectual is in rebellion against, and that is what he hates: reason and faith, hope for the future and respect for the past.

8 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

THE BEER CANNON !

Posted June 16, 2006 By John C Wright

It’s a guy thing:
http://www.devilducky.com/media/46502/

Some irate blogger once described me a guy who posts notices in comments-boxes and trolls the internet telling people boasting of his own smarts. My simple-minded amusement at the BEER CANNON, or the fact that I would admit same in public, should scotch that rumor.

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Rightwing Darth Vader

Posted June 16, 2006 By John C Wright

I should keep my opinions to myself on the touchy subject of Darth Vader’s political leanings, but nontheless I will drop the hint that I think he is more Ghibelline than Guelph.

However, at the NRO Corner, J Goldberg argues that Vader is not Rightwing:

“Darth Vader grew up poor and oppressed — a slave even! He was saved by a progressive organization which took him in out of a mixture of pity and affirmative action. He was admitted thanks to a sort of one-drop-rule quota (his only qualification is that he had the right midichlorian mix in his blood). The organization was comprised of nature-worshipping technocrats who believed that there their Gnostic insight into the nature of the universe gave them the unique privilege to fix everything they laid their eyes on. Their new age faith involved a lot of talk about getting in touch with your feelings and distrusting technology (but Darth never appreciated the hypocrisy of his own limousine liberal bionics). Corrupted by power, John Kerryesque arrogance, and other selfish motives, young Darth — then going by his slave name Anakin — embraced the Empire which sought to overturn the planet’s-rights system of the republic in favor of centralized planning. He then dedicated most of his career to enforcing a classically progressive, top-down socialism of the “one-best way,” breaking contracts with mining companies when it suited him. Late in life, when he realized the unintended consequences of central planning, he recanted. So maybe at the very end he was a neocon of sorts. But by then he changed his name back to Anakin. Regardless, I don’t think we should be claiming Darth Vader as a rightwinger.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjQ3ODQyOGY3ZjdkZWE5OGU3MmM1YzUzOGIyOWQ0ODk=

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Star Colonization

Posted June 16, 2006 By John C Wright

Mark Shea at CATHOLIC AND ENJOYING IT has a thread related to space colonization, where your humble author has made a comment or two, which tickled Mr. Shea enough to draw attention to them:

http://markshea.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_markshea_archive.html#115022542586682376

http://markshea.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_markshea_archive.html#115040013769919445

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

The good and bad of web logs

Posted June 14, 2006 By John C Wright

Interesting discussion here. The writer’s conclusion is that the Net is good for information, bad for cogitation.

http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2006/003/17.36.html

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Back to School

Posted June 6, 2006 By John C Wright

That’s odd. University of Washington-English Department might be using my books in a classroom on a course on cybernetic democracy. If I am being studied in school alongside Swamp Thing, now I know I’m famous. But …. shouldn’t these kids be reading Aristotle?

http://depts.washington.edu/engl/grad/course.php?qtr=4&year=2006

556B Cyborg Democracy (w/Hum 596A) Foster MW 1:30-3:30

“Popular texts might include fiction by Bruce Sterling, Samuel R. Delany, Greg Egan, John Wright, Charles Stross, Octavia Butler, and Nalo Hopkinson; films like Strange Days, The Matrix, Robot Stories, or Final Cut; and graphic novels like Transmetropolitan or Swamp Thing.”

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Lincoln Quote of the Day

Posted June 6, 2006 By John C Wright

“Common looking people are the best in the world: that is the reason the Lord makes so many of them.” Lincoln and the Civil War In the Diaries and Letters of John Hay selected by Tyler Dennett (Da Capo Press, New York, 1988), p. 143.

Be the first to comment

Whitsunday

Posted June 6, 2006 By John C Wright

Well, one interesting thing about converting to Christianity is that there is so much rich and varied background to Christianity. There is always something new to learn.
We have another holiday, equal in dignity to Easter and Christmas, of which the heathens do not hear. Fifty days after Easter is the Pentecost, celebrated since ancient times. Whitsunday (White Sunday) is so called for the white robes of the petitioners baptised during the vigil. It is the celebration of the birth of the Church, the arrival of the Holy Spirit on Earth.

Now if only there was a famous cartoon character, like Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny, to market this holiday, or if Charles Dickens had written a book about it, then it would be well known. My suggestion is SPACE GHOST. He could be seen descending in his Phantom Cruiser to give gifts to good little boys and girls, defeating Brak and Zorak the space-criminals, and using his Power Rays to energize the Seven Gifts of the Spirit: Fear of the Lord, Knowledge, Understanding, Piety, Fortitude, Counsel, and Wisdom. Blip the space monkey could appear in the form of a dove, with a double-forked flame glowing on his head. After the solemn festivities, and granting the gift of tongues to the Galactic Patrol, the Space Ghost returns to his Ghost Planet in the Omicron Sector. Jan and Jace go to Rome and get crucified and beheaded.

Well, maybe not. But then again, it is not any more or less true to the original than Santy or the Easter Bunny, is it? And since the Armies of Darkness are bent on removing Easter Eggs and Santa Clause as well as other signs of Easter and Christmas from every public celebration, court house, and town hall, may it is time for Christian to take the initiative, and start adding MORE symbols and festive color to the world.

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Null-A Continuum

Posted June 2, 2006 By John C Wright

I have been very fortunate with book covers. Now, if only fortune can strike nine times in a row, then I can get the cover I daydream about for NULL-A CONTINUUM, should the book ever be published. Right now, the estate and the publishers are still in negotiation, so keep your fingers crossed:

Read the remainder of this entry »

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Hurrah!

Posted June 2, 2006 By John C Wright

Here is an even larger close-up of the cover art for Fugitives of Chaos. The artist, Scott Fischer, has captured the look and mood of Amelia and Colin perfectly.

Read the remainder of this entry »

1 Comment. Join the Conversation