Archive for April, 2010

A short observation on STARMAKER by Stapledon

Posted April 30, 2010 By John C Wright

Part of an ongoing conversation. A reader known only by the mysterious initials  whswhs has this remark about myths:

“I take a myth to be a story about beings who can act on a cosmic scale; who, rather than being part of nature, are the shapers of nature, with powers that transcend nature, and whose actions in the past made nature what it is and may have caused it to come into being in the first place. Tolkien’s account of the Valar is a myth; so is Blake’s story of the division of the Four Zoas and their emanations; so is the Norse account of the birth of the gods, their killing of Ymir, and their making the world from his body; so is Genesis, or a large part of it. I might call Lovecraft’s stories of the Elder Gods myths; I’m not sure I would say that about Stapledon’s Star Maker; I would not say it about Smith’s Arisians and Eddorians, who are purely natural beings.”

My comment:

Hm. I would class the Starmaker of Olaf Stapledon as a supernatural being. He is a maker of universes, a legislator of the laws of nature. On a mythopoetical level, the Starmaker is a very modern idea (Darwinian and Hegelian evolution) being presented as a person: Starmaker “is” evolution in the same way that Neptune “is” ocean.

Read the remainder of this entry »

14 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Wright’s Writing Corner — Open Active

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

Latest from an ongoing series of writing tips from L. Jagi Lamplighter:

http://arhyalon.livejournal.com/117379.html

In which is discussed the technique called in medias res of opening a story or scene in the midst of the action.

“I cut hard to the right, avoiding an oncoming truck. We had risen early this morning so we could wash the car before setting out. At the time, it had not occurred to us that they might find us during the trip, so we had not brought our weapons. If they caught us, all we had to defend ourselves with was my little brother’s soccer cleat that he left in the car by mistake and an old umbrella.”

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

An article from The American Culture website, touching a theme I have more than once addressed:

In a recent article on “The New Backlash Against Casual Sex,” Slate “Double X”  blogger Jessica Grose reacts with abject revulsion toward recent events manifesting what she sees as the “fervent conservatism” of the current decade. These atrocities include a new book called I Don’t Care About Your Band, in which feminist writer Julie Klausner documents her disappointments with casual sex.

Espying a sinister pattern behind these events, Grose bemoans what she characterizes as a horrid resurgence of puritanism that has become a common attitude among young females and is somehow perverting even once-sensible feminists such as Ms. Klausner:

Domestic bliss is now the cultural ideal for young women, which is why Lori Gottlieb haranguing women to settle for Mr. Good Enough in her new book Marry Him hit such a raw nerve. Cue the “spinster panic” articles, like this one from the New York Times in January, which talks about how successful beautiful women are “victims of a role reversal” that will leave them single because men aren’t making as much money as they are anymore.

At the start of this decade, we have thoroughly internalized these recent conservative cultural messages about the importance of marriage: “73 percent of women born between 1977 and 1989 place a high priority on marriage,” writes Hannah Seligson in theWall Street Journal. If what Gen Y wants is marriage, then it follows that feelings about sex would be more complicated—and in some cases, deeply judgmental. A Princeton freshman wrote an op-ed last week about why her friend should not be allowed to claim rape after a night of highly inebriated sex, the implicit message being that she should not have been having inebriated sex in the first place. A poll taken last month in London showed that women were less likely to forgive a rape victim than men were.

Isn’t that just awful? Women want to get married, think it’s not rape if a friend gets drunk, has sex, and then regrets it, and find they can’t attract many men who earn less money than they do. Gee, whatever happened to liberty?

[…] But the grotesque crassness of the past decade may well have brought about at least one very good consequence: the tawdry reality behind the ideals of orgasm-obsessed feminists such as Grose has been laid bare for all to see and judge …

You may read the whole thing here.

Read the remainder of this entry »

11 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A New Genre — Tales of Future Past

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

Part of an ongoing conversation:

There is a new genre different from science fiction that could not have existed except in a culture where science fiction has lingered for a century — call it retrofuture, anachronistic science fiction, steampunk, or tales of futures past. This genre includes anything that at one time in the past had been futuristic science fiction and now can no longer be, except perhaps as sideways-in-time tales. It would include both Jules Verne and deliberate later attempts to recapture the look and feel of Verne, such as (most notably) THE LAND LEVIATHAN by Michael Moorcock and works following it, usually called Steampunk, or anything with a Zeppelin on the cover.

Technically, Pournelle’s Co-Dominium series, or anything starring a futuristic result of the Cold War  would now fit into this anachronistic futures category I am proposing, but I am not aware of anyone having written a deliberately retrofuture story taking place in the timeline where the Berlin Wall never fell, nor the Iron Curtain rose.

Be the first to comment

End Scene of Ringworld

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

One of my readers admits she has never read to the end of Larry Nivens’ widely admired RINGWORLD

As a public service, I will describe the final scenes in detail of his Nebula & Hugo-Award winning classic:

Louis Wu manages to destroy the Thrint Slaver by splashing her with a bucket of liquid oxygen. As a reward, Nessus is given a courage by the Ringworld Engineer, who turns out to be a Pak Protector; Teela Brown gets a heart and marries Conan the Barbarian; and Speaker-to-Animals gets a brain; and Louis Wu is carried back home to Auntie Em, who lives in the Kansas Arcology, but she has been arrested for giving unlicensed birth. He wakes to find his friends and family gathered around him, and when he insists that the Ringworld was a truly live and real place, the ARM police zap him with a tasp over and over again, until he admits there is no place like home.

The best scene, in my opinion, is when Speaker-to-Animals bursts into song:

"I would like to stab and slaughter
Mankind and his daughter
Without scruple or reserve —

[do DOOT dolootle to-doo!]

But Kzin has lost four stellar wars
I’d claim it was a long lost cause
IF I ONLY HAD LESS NERVE"

Lou Wu Confronts Speaker-To-Animals (file photo)
Be the first to comment

Great Books of SF — Tentative defintion of SF v F

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

Part of an ongoing conversation:

Reader ShadowLC gives his picks for SF books meeting Mortimer Adler’s definition of a Great Book:
Read the remainder of this entry »

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

TRAILER: Kino International’s Restored ‘Metropolis’

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

The fine fellows over at SfSignal, by way of FirstShowing.net, reveal that the long-lost complete version of Fritz Lang’s METROPOLIS is being released. TRAILER: Kino International’s Restored ‘Metropolis’

For those of you unfamiliar with the backstory, METROPOLIS had been (in my opinion) ruthlessly and awkwardly edited for its release in England and America back in the 1920’s, and the title cards rehashed. The English-language writer (whose name I deservedly forget) was someone not very sympathetic to science fiction, and did not get the point of the sub-plot involving the robot, so he changed it. This was done with the clubfooted hamhandedness and distaste for the original that, for example, Paul Verhoeven brought to the film adaptation of Heinlein’s STARSHIP TROOPERS.

But in the early days, films, like pulp magazines, were not expected to linger. Even the idea of re-releasing them or showing them in re-run had not yet been invented. So the original prints of this, as with many films, were lost, or rotted in their cans.

But a complete version existed, forgotten, in the form of a 16mm duplicate negative at the Buenos Aires Museo del Cine. It contained around 25 minutes of lost footage, comprising a fifth of the film’s original running time.It was found when a clerk noticed a difference between the running time written on the reel can, and the actual size of the reel.

Trailer below the cut

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

I first heard of the Tea Party movement when my best friend and his wife (he is white; she is yellow) invited me and my black ex-roommate to come.

The first time I heard the allegation that the Tea Party movement was racist was the day the newspaper printed a photo of one of the tea partiers carrying a rifle over his back. The man in the picture was black, and his head was carefully cropped out of the photo, so that you could only see the scary gun he was carrying.

The second time I heard the allegation was when a man named Alfonzo Rachel (a hero of mine) was denouncing the allegations. Zo happens to be black. He was speaking at a Tea Party Rally at the time.

The third time I heard about this allegation was when I head Andrew Breitbart in unambiguous wrath offering a healthy reward of money to anyone who could produce a video from an event — there were apparently many handheld cameras there, including countless cellphones — of someone using a demeaning racial epithet against the Black Caucus, who paraded around on the day in question perhaps hoping for just such an word to be spoken. Breitbart said that when no such word was spoken, the servile main stream media merely proceeded with the “narrative” without any evidence, without feeling the need to produce any evidence.

(If his theory is true, it would be evidence of the type of integrity one can expect in a post-scientific, post-philosophical, post-rational culture. If you live in a world-view where only feelings, not facts, matter, then evidence, which conveys knowledge of facts and therefore has sovereignty over feelings, is not merely unrelated to feelings, evidence is an obstruction to The Cause and demanding evidence is a breach of good manners.)

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

Great Book of Science Fiction—Yet to be Written?

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

In our last episode, we encountered Mortimer Adler’s definition of what constituted a ‘Great Book’. There were three criteria:

* TIMELESS: Great Books should be works that are as much of concern to us today as at the time they were written, even if that was centuries ago. They are thus essentially timeless — always contemporary, and not confined to interests that change from time to time or from place to place.
* INFINITE: The second criterion was their infinite re-readability. Few books are worth reading more than once. A great book is inexhaustibly re-readable. It cannot be fully understood on one, two, or three readings. More is to be found on all subsequent readings. One re-reads a great book with greater pleasure and more insight on each rereading.
* RELEVANT: The third criterion was the relevance of the work to a very large number of great ideas and great issues that have occupied the minds of thinking individuals for the last twenty-five centuries. The authors of these books take part in the great conversation, reading the works of many of their predecessors, and answering them. In other words, the great books are the books in which the great conversation occurs about the great ideas. It is the set of great ideas that determines the choice of the great books.

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

Peter Kreeft

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

I had the great honor and privilege of being inviting to a private talk given by Peter Kreeft at the Catholic Information Center, which is a bookstore and spiritual arsenal hunched in the position of a gladiator on K street in Babylon, that Great City, about two blocks from the offices of the Washington Post. It is run by Opus Dei, but I did not see any albino assassins there, or else I would have turned in my resume.

During the reception, I engaged in conversation a man of particular wit and good sense, someone extraordinarily well read in philosophy and Thomism (better read than yours truly, which, in all immodesty, is rare enough), and he and fell to speaking about science fiction books. He declared the best SF book of all time was Canticle for Leibowitz by Walter M. Miller, Jr., but he allowed that Ray Bradbury’s Martian Chronicles were near enough in excellency to make it a photo finish. He disallowed Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy from the running on the ground that it was fantasy, not Science Fiction properly so called.

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

I had not heard this news

Posted April 29, 2010 By John C Wright

This was in 2006. I did not hear this until Andrew Klavan made a joke about the film-makers who did the recent hagiographical biopic of Red mass-murderer Che Guevara making a film about a real hero, a man who died for his faith while fighting against evil, rather than, as Che, for it.

It seems that a Roman Catholic Priest from Italy, while at prayer,  was shot in the back by a sixteen-year-old Muslim boy, who shouted ‘Allah is Great’ during the gruesome and random murder. There is some suspicion (not mentioned in the articles below) that the Russian Mafia may have been behind the crime, since the father was known for opposing the white slavery/prostitution ring operating in Trebizon.
http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Nuncio-in-Ankara:-Fr-Andrea-Santoro,-a-martyr-for-the-third-millennium-5303.html

Time Magazine uses the news as an excuse to smear boogers of blame on the Pope:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1535432,00.html

Be the first to comment

Second Update on Pluto Day

Posted April 24, 2010 By John C Wright

A reader writes in and says he would have welcomed the addition of Eris as a tenth planet.

I, too, who live in a reasonable terror of the Red Lectroids from Planet Ten, also would have welcomed them into the Solar Union, rather than dismiss them, trampling their civil rights, by exiling them to the status of merely dwellers on asteroids.

Read the remainder of this entry »

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

This Just In: Warmists with Frostbite

Posted April 23, 2010 By John C Wright

The ever-brilliant Mr. Moeller writes an adroit and trenchant message for Lenin’s Birthday Earth Day. This just amused me to no end:

Happy Earth Day, comrades! 

I myself plan to demonstrate my regard for the green lifestyle in the usual fashion: by eating a Big Mac in my car with the air conditioner on.

And now, some Earth Day reading:

An activist planned to travel unassisted to the North Pole to demonstrate the dangers of warming temperatures and vanishing Arctic ice. He promptly developed frostbite and had to be rescued. The best part? He wasn’t the first activist to have to turn back due to cold temperatures on one of these little awareness-raising trips.

The coordinator of the original Earth Day decries the "holiday’s" growing commercialism:

“This ridiculous perverted marketing has cheapened the concept of what is really green,” said Denis Hayes, who was national coordinator of the first Earth Day and is returning to organize this year’s activities in Washington. “It is tragic.”

If by "tragic" he means "bloody hilarious", then yes. Perhaps the marketers will be visited by the Ghosts of Earth Days Past, Present, and Future, who will teach the true spirit of Earth Day:

Joyless secular Puritanism? Self-righteous nagging? Meaningless feel-good bromides? Neglecting personal hygiene because it’s good for the environment? 

Now that would make for a fun Earth Day card.

Go to the Jonathan Moeller website and leave an Earth Day message if you liked this entry. Or, if you just like the threestoogesesque irony of a Warmist false-alarm-ringer getting frostbite, one after another after a fourth.

Be the first to comment

Update on Pluto Day

Posted April 22, 2010 By John C Wright

One of my thousands of loyal henchwomen who walk unnoticed among the muggles and mundanes of the ordinary world sends in this picture in honor of Pluto Day.

Read the remainder of this entry »

1 Comment. Join the Conversation

Not Earth Day: PLUTO DAY!

Posted April 22, 2010 By John C Wright

While the rest of you Earthlings are celebrating Earth Day (a holiday beloved of Enviro-Marxist Gaeanist Neo-pagan Neo-Puritan Death Cultists whose scientific literacy is somewhere south of the Flat Earth Society) we here at the headquarters of the more cosmologically minded and cosmopolitan Space Princess Movement have decided to break the bonds of geocentric parochialism (our motto is ‘Think Globally, Act Galactically’) and celebrate a day devoted to another planet, one more worthy of our attention and affection.

Yes, I hereby decree today to be PLUTO DAY!

Let us look in the Internets (Thanks, Al Gore!) otherwise known as the Web of Lies, to see what can be gleaned about this fascinating and elusive ex-planet, or, pardon me, former planet. (OO-rah!)

http://astrofacts.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/plutos-answering-machine/

Pluto was discovered in 1930 by Clyde W. Tombaugh in Arizona at the Lowell Observatory. It is composed primarily of rock and ice and is approximately a fifth the mass of the Earth’s Moon and a third its volume. It has been recently classified as a “dwarf planet“, largely due to the resent discovery of a larger dwarf planet named Eris, by Dr. Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

Pluto and its largest moon, Charon, are sometimes treated together as a binary system because the barycenter of their orbits does not lie within either body. The IAU has yet to formalize a definition for binary dwarf planets, and until it passes such a ruling, they classify Charon as a moon of Pluto.

————————————————-

Hmpf. As a staunch plutonian, I am aghast at the paradox that Charon is still officially a moon of a body that is no longer officially a planet. What does that make Charon? A dwarf moon? Someone phone Thorin Oakenshield, Albrecht, and ‘Doc’ to get their opinion.

This is what scientists know about Pluto.

But so what? What do science fiction writers know about Pluto?

Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment