Part of an ongoing conversation. A reader known only by the mysterious initials whswhs has this remark about myths:
“I take a myth to be a story about beings who can act on a cosmic scale; who, rather than being part of nature, are the shapers of nature, with powers that transcend nature, and whose actions in the past made nature what it is and may have caused it to come into being in the first place. Tolkien’s account of the Valar is a myth; so is Blake’s story of the division of the Four Zoas and their emanations; so is the Norse account of the birth of the gods, their killing of Ymir, and their making the world from his body; so is Genesis, or a large part of it. I might call Lovecraft’s stories of the Elder Gods myths; I’m not sure I would say that about Stapledon’s Star Maker; I would not say it about Smith’s Arisians and Eddorians, who are purely natural beings.”
My comment:
Hm. I would class the Starmaker of Olaf Stapledon as a supernatural being. He is a maker of universes, a legislator of the laws of nature. On a mythopoetical level, the Starmaker is a very modern idea (Darwinian and Hegelian evolution) being presented as a person: Starmaker “is” evolution in the same way that Neptune “is” ocean.
Read the remainder of this entry »