Part of an ongoing discussion with the esteemed Tom Simon.
Be forewarned that I am sure to be bested when matching wits with so well read and broad an intellect: but, if I am humble, perhaps the experience will school me.
We are discussing whether the element called “worldbuilding” is unique to science fiction and fantasy, and, if so, how.
Me: “My contention is that there is a element of storytelling present in otherworldly and extraterrestrial stories — whose laws of nature include technologies and magic powers and strange beasts invented by the author that must be introduced to the reader — which is an element not present in stories taking place on Earth, even if taking place in foreign setting.”
Mr. Simon: “My contention is that the difference is one of degree and not of kind.”
Me: “I call that element worldbuilding. What do you call it?”
Mr. Simon: “You may recall that I call it ‘legosity’. It is a part of worldbuilding, but not the whole of it; and no writer, even of SF, excels at all facets of worldbuilding. Tolkien himself has been lambasted by critics for his ‘paucity of imaginative invention’ – meaning that the critics in question wanted one kind of invention and he supplied another.
“At bottom, this is the same disagreement we had over the classification of the Gormenghast books as fantasy. They are, in fact, Ruritanian fantasy, which is a legitimate subcategory. I would argue that if you leave out the dragons, the ‘Game of Thrones’ monstrosity is Ruritanian pornography in which the principal ‘kinks’ are torture and betrayal. We are stuck with these things; we cannot wish them out of our country, any more than the hobbits could wish Mordor out of Middle-earth.”
*** *** ***
My comment: I confess I do not understand the distinction you are making. As best I can tell, you are using the word “worldbuilding” to refer to the whole craft of writing.
I am discussing a specific element that enters a story when it leaves the fields we know for future times, alien planets, elfin realms, myth, and wonder.
Let us explore whether this is a difference of kind or of degree.
Read the remainder of this entry »