Archive for November, 2008

The Power of Prediction

Posted November 20, 2008 By John C Wright

Quotes from DARKNESS AND LIGHT by Olaf Stapledon. 

This science fiction book was written in 1942. In his prologue, Stapledon is careful to announce that he is not writing prophecy, merely a fable of one possible future or, in this case, two. That was a wise caveat to add.

Read the remainder of this entry »

9 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Fungus Fuel

Posted November 19, 2008 By John C Wright

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1082899/Tree-living-fungus-manufactures-diesel-new-source-green-energy.html

A tree-living fungus that manufactures diesel fuel has been discovered in South America.

Experts believe the organism, Gliocladium roseum, could potentially be a completely new source of green energy.

The fungus, which lives inside the Ulmo tree in the Patagonian rainforest, naturally produces hydrocarbon fuel similar to the diesel usedin cars and trucks.

Myself, I like the fact that is was discovered in Patagonia, which is not only the land of the giants where Setebos is worshiped, but also the home of the weary second civilization of First Men once the Sino-American World-State returns to the stone ages due to aeroplane-induced racial degradation.

17 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

How Can You Keep Calling it Science?

Posted November 18, 2008 By John C Wright

isaac_wilcott made a comment in my comments box I think bears repeating:

When Michael Crichton’s death was announced, I was shocked and disgusted at how many of the articles, and those commenting on the articles, went out of their way to condemn his "questioning" of man-made global warming. If you had replaced the phrase "global warming" with "the virgin birth of Christ," the tone of these people sounds exactly the same. It was as if they were condemning a heretic for daring to blaspheme against Holy Writ. I thought science was all about doubt and questioning, not faith? And if something posing as science can’t hold up to inquiry and re-examining the data, how can you keep calling it science?
99 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Guys and Dolls – Only doing it for some doll

Posted November 17, 2008 By John C Wright

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqkOGt0-Ouk
Love this song. As part of the joys of parenting, when I was playing this for my ten, eight and five year olds, I had to explain what was a flat, a mug, platinum fol-de-rol, a jug, not to mention Vitalis and Barbasol. I also had to explain gambling to them. Showtunes are quite an education.

My question is, the dame who sashays across the screen at around 2.17 in this clip, glittering and glamorous — am I the only guy who envies that Joe carrying her packages and lighting her smokes? I think she is drop-dead gorgeous, and well worth walking behind. Which sort of cuts against the whole point of the song, if you see my point. Especially if you get to tickle her pink on Saturday night.

Is glamor still in fashion? I see any number of actresses or models who are attractive, or sensual, but almost none who have that air of glamor that was once the sine qua non of the stage and screen.

This song delights my old-fashioned curmudgeonly heart, of course, since it is on the same theme as Dante and Beatrice: an ode to the redemptive power of feminine love to get a jerk to get a job.

Do women still provoke their menfolk to make something of themselves out there in the great unwashed postmodern wilderness of America? Or is that notion been dismissed as non-progressive?

14 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Convenient Untruth

Posted November 17, 2008 By John C Wright

Here I reprint without comment the whole text of an article by Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker

A surreal scientific blunder last week raised a huge question mark about the temperature records that underpin the worldwide alarm over global warming. On Monday, Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), which is run by Al Gore’s chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, and is one of four bodies responsible for monitoring global temperatures, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

This was startling. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China‘s official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its "worst snowstorm ever". In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.

So what explained the anomaly? GISS’s computerised temperature maps seemed to show readings across a large part of Russia had been up to 10 degrees higher than normal. But when expert readers of the two leading warming-sceptic blogs, Watts Up With That and Climate Audit, began detailed analysis of the GISS data they made an astonishing discovery. The reason for the freak figures was that scores of temperature records from Russia and elsewhere were not based on October readings at all. Figures from the previous month had simply been carried over and repeated two months running.

The error was so glaring that when it was reported on the two blogs – run by the US meteorologist Anthony Watts and Steve McIntyre, the Canadian computer analyst who won fame for his expert debunking of the notorious "hockey stick" graph – GISS began hastily revising its figures. This only made the confusion worse because, to compensate for the lowered temperatures in Russia, GISS claimed to have discovered a new "hotspot" in the Arctic – in a month when satellite images were showing Arctic sea-ice recovering so fast from its summer melt that three weeks ago it was 30 per cent more extensive than at the same time last year.

A GISS spokesman lamely explained that the reason for the error in the Russian figures was that they were obtained from another body, and that GISS did not have resources to exercise proper quality control over the data it was supplied with.

This is an astonishing admission: the figures published by Dr Hansen’s institute are not only one of the four data sets that the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) relies on to promote its case for global warming, but they are the most widely quoted, since they consistently show higher temperatures than the others.

Read the remainder of this entry »

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Personal Appearance

Posted November 15, 2008 By John C Wright

To any of my readers in New York, I will be giving a short lecture on Null-A and Science Fiction, and speaking about my new book NULL-A CONTINUUM at the Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture and Creating the Future Symposium to be held this weekend. 

It is free and open to the public, with the exception of the dinner preceding the AKML, which is $90. The information is available on the
Institute of General Semantics website at

http://www.generalsemantics.org/index.php/discov/alfred/memoir.html

Sunday, Nov. 16

All Sessions in McMahon Hall Lounge

8:30 AM Breakfast and Registration

9-10:15 Program: Media Futures
Moderator: Brian Cogan, Molloy College

Thom Gencarelli, Manhattan College, "The End of Intellectual Property"

Robert Blechman, St. George’s University, "Things Come in Fours"

Jessica K. Crowell, Fordham University, "The Umbilical Cord: Corrections,
Connections and the Role of Media in America’s Prisons"

10:30-12 Program: Science Fiction: Sequels and Adaptations
Moderator, Meir Ribalow, Fordham University

John C. Wright, Tor Books, "Null-A Continuum "

Marleen Barr, Fordham University, "Science Fiction Tells Us Why the Obama
Family is a Sequel to The Cosby Show"

Paul Levinson, Fordham University, "From the Page to the Screen"

9 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Ad astra

Posted November 14, 2008 By John C Wright

First photographs of exosolar planets.

The firs three are in the system is HR 8799.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/081113-hubble-exoplanet.html

Astronomers have taken what they say are the first-ever direct images of planets outside of our solar system, including a visible-light snapshot of a single-planet system and an infrared picture of a multiple-planet system.

Earth-like worlds might also exist in the three-planet system, but if so they are too dim to photograph. The other newfound planet orbits a star called Fomalhaut, which is visible without the aid of a telescope. It is the 18th brightest star in the sky.

The massive worlds, each much heftier than Jupiter (at least for the three-planet system), could change how astronomers define the term "planet," one planet-hunter said.

Change how astronomers define the term planet, eh? Well, I for one have had enough of that! Now, before the scientific community gets a chance to pull a Pluto and say that they are not planets, because they don’t sweep out an atmospheric orbit or somesuch, I feel that we, the leaders of the New Space Princess speculative fiction movement, should intrude ourselves into the spotlight of world scientific affairs. Planets should be defined by science fiction writers, not by scientists!

Read the remainder of this entry »

13 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Boo-hoo, and let me get out my crying bag, Mr. Edword.

Posted November 14, 2008 By John C Wright

see http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html

"There are an awful lot of agnostics, atheists and other types of non-theists who feel a little alone during the holidays because of its association with traditional religion."
 

I feel a rant a-coming on.

Read the remainder of this entry »

30 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Objective concepts in an atheist universe

Posted November 14, 2008 By John C Wright

ibookworm wonders

"For those who profess to be atheists but who claim not to be metaphysical naturalists, who claim to believe in objective concepts, I suspect that they simply haven’t thought their atheism through all the way. But I admit I do have trouble looking at the issue from their perspective. When you were an atheist did you believe it rationally possible to both disbelieve in God and believe in the objective, the abstract, the universal? If so, how?

All I can report is that when I was an atheist, I believed in concepts, objective, abstract, universal, and so on. I called a concept objective if it did not depend on the observer for its properties. I called it abstract if it was an abstraction from particulars, and universal if it was independent rather than dependent on particulars.

As to where concepts come from, or why twice two is equal to four, was indeed a question I could not answer in my atheist days, since, being concepts, I did not think they "came from" anywhere.

To say "God made it so" is the same as saying "the unknown and unknowable made it so" is the same as saying "I don’t know what makes it so."

But I did not then contemplate how a concept can be ‘made so.’ I thought concepts were eternal, not part of the world of being and becoming. I did not think the legislature in Kansas could make pi equal to three, nor did I think Jove by his Olympian decree could make or change the value of pi. And the Christian God was just an inflated version of Jove.

As far as I know, relatively few people of any camp are true "metaphysical naturalists." (Or what Ayn Rand would call "Mystics of the Muscle") .

Read the remainder of this entry »

19 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article5141745.ece

Read the remainder of this entry »

6 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Why Believe in God?

Posted November 12, 2008 By John C Wright

Ads on buses have a girl dressed like Santa Claus asking riders the Question of Lucretius.

see http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html

Ads proclaiming, "Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness’ sake," will appear on Washington, D.C., buses starting next week and running through December. The American Humanist Association unveiled the provocative $40,000 holiday ad campaign Tuesday.

In lifting lyrics from "Santa Claus is Coming to Town," the Washington-based group is wading into what has become a perennial debate over commercialism, religion in the public square and the meaning of Christmas.

"We are trying to reach our audience, and sometimes in order to reach an audience, everybody has to hear you," said Fred Edwords, spokesman for the humanist group. "Our reason for doing it during the holidays is there are an awful lot of agnostics, atheists and other types of non-theists who feel a little alone during the holidays because of its association with traditional religion."

To that end, the ads and posters will include a link to a Web site that will seek to connect and organize like-minded thinkers in the D.C. area, Edwords said.

Edwords said the purpose isn’t to argue that God doesn’t exist or change minds about a deity, although "we are trying to plant a seed of rational thought and critical thinking and questioning in people’s minds."

Because, of course, rational and critical thinking is an exclusive province of the atheist camp.

Read the remainder of this entry »

123 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

A Tribute the John Williams

Posted November 11, 2008 By John C Wright

hat tip to gillen 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk5_OSsawz4
Done entirely with voice and lines of STAR WARS. These guys would make a great barbershop quartet. Unless it is all the same guy.

3 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

FRIENDS!

Posted November 11, 2008 By John C Wright

Someone just wrote as asked if I had de-friended him because I were mad at him.

In case someone out there is thinking the same thing, and did not write, let me explain.

I was doing routine maintenance on my friends page, trying to update my friends list (which I had not done in two or three years). I added some people from my friends list, but the livejournal application would not let me save my changes. So I went back in and de-friended some people at random, so see if I could get the list small enough to work. I was thinking I would add friends in segments. So far, the livejournal application has outsmarted me, and any corrections will be made slowly.

So, if I friended then de-friended or re-friended or un-re-de-friended you, nothing personal. Just a computer glitch: what we in the business call ‘Operator Error.’

14 Comments so far. Join the Conversation

Happy Veteran’s Day

Posted November 11, 2008 By John C Wright

An article worth reading on Veteran’s Day by the illustrious Andrew Klavan: My visit to Afghanistan, and the War on Terror movie that Hollywood would never make. http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_4_afghanistan.html

Remember on this day to thank those who serve. A visit to a VA hospital might be a kind gesture. Read the remainder of this entry »

Be the first to comment

Mark Shea asks that eternal question

Posted November 11, 2008 By John C Wright
Hat tip to Mark Shea at CAEI
 
Is it even possible for Pixar to make a bad film?

            Behold the trailer for "Up"!

and a shorter spot

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zCRytxL1Wlg&feature=related

12 Comments so far. Join the Conversation